<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ESurf</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Earth Surface Dynamics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ESurf</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Earth Surf. Dynam.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2196-632X</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/esurf-8-221-2020</article-id><title-group><article-title>Hillslope denudation and morphologic response<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> to a rock uplift gradient</article-title><alt-title>Hillslopes across a rock uplift gradient</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Hillslopes across a~rock uplift gradient}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{V.~Godard~et~al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Godard</surname><given-names>Vincent</given-names></name>
          <email>godard@cerege.fr</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0143-5893</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Hippolyte</surname><given-names>Jean-Claude</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0812-8992</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Cushing</surname><given-names>Edward</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1601-8323</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Espurt</surname><given-names>Nicolas</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Fleury</surname><given-names>Jules</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Bellier</surname><given-names>Olivier</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Ollivier</surname><given-names>Vincent</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4326-6891</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>the ASTER Team</surname><given-names/></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Aix-Marseille Univ., CNRS, IRD, INRAE, Coll France, CEREGE, Aix-en-Provence, France</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Institut Universitaire de France (IUF), Paris, France</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>PSE-ENV/SCAN, Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Aix-Marseille Univ., CNRS, Ministry of Culture, LAMPEA, Aix-en-Provence, France</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>➕</label><institution>A full list of authors appears at the end of the paper.</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Vincent Godard (godard@cerege.fr)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>7</day><month>April</month><year>2020</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>8</volume>
      <issue>2</issue>
      <fpage>221</fpage><lpage>243</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>17</day><month>September</month><year>2019</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>3</day><month>March</month><year>2020</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>16</day><month>February</month><year>2020</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>25</day><month>October</month><year>2019</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2020 Vincent Godard et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2020</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://esurf.copernicus.org/articles/8/221/2020/esurf-8-221-2020.html">This article is available from https://esurf.copernicus.org/articles/8/221/2020/esurf-8-221-2020.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://esurf.copernicus.org/articles/8/221/2020/esurf-8-221-2020.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://esurf.copernicus.org/articles/8/221/2020/esurf-8-221-2020.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>
    <p id="d1e172">Documenting the spatial variability of tectonic processes from topography is routinely undertaken through the analysis of river profiles, since
a direct relationship between fluvial gradient and rock uplift has been identified by incision models. Similarly, theoretical formulations of
hillslope profiles predict a strong dependence on their base-level lowering rate, which in most situations is set by channel incision. However, the
reduced sensitivity of near-threshold hillslopes and the limited availability of high-resolution topographic data has often been a major limitation
for their use to investigate tectonic gradients. Here we combined high-resolution analysis of hillslope morphology and cosmogenic-nuclide-derived
denudation rates to unravel the distribution of rock uplift across a blind thrust system at the southwestern Alpine front in France. Our study is
located in the Mio-Pliocene Valensole molassic basin, where a series of folds and thrusts has deformed a plateau surface. We focused on a series of
catchments aligned perpendicular to the main structures. Using a 1 m lidar digital terrain model, we extracted hillslope topographic properties
such as hilltop curvature <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mtext>HT</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and nondimensional erosion rates <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
We observed systematic variation of these metrics coincident with
the location of a major underlying thrust system identified by seismic surveys. Using a simple deformation model, the inversion of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pattern
allows us to propose a location and dip for a blind thrust, which are consistent with available geological and geophysical data. We also sampled
clasts from eroding conglomerates at several hilltop locations for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Be</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">26</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration measurements. Calculated hilltop
denudation rates range from 40 to 120 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kyr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. These denudation rates appear to be correlated with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mtext>HT</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> that were extracted
from the morphological analysis, and these rates are used to derive absolute estimates for the fault slip rate. This high-resolution hillslope analysis allows
us to resolve short-wavelength variations in rock uplift that would not be possible to unravel using commonly used channel-profile-based
methods. Our joint analysis of topography and geochronological data supports the interpretation of active thrusting at the southwestern Alpine
front, and such approaches may bring crucial complementary constraints to morphotectonic analysis for the study of slowly slipping faults.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<?pagebreak page222?><sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e281">The topography of the Earth evolves in response to surface processes driven by external forcing of tectonic and climatic origins
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13 bib1.bibx116" id="paren.1"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. Information about tectonic uplift is sequentially transmitted through landscapes, firstly by
the adjustment of river gradients, which then set the local base level of hillslopes. The water supply and temperature set by climatic conditions
control the efficiency of weathering, erosion and transport processes across the Earth's surface. The present-day land surface morphology results from
this accumulated actions of tectonic and climatic forcing through time, and a major endeavor of geomorphological research is to interpret measurable
topographic properties in terms of space and time variations of either of these tectonic uplift or climatic conditions
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx97 bib1.bibx28 bib1.bibx40" id="paren.2"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. In particular, documenting the spatial variability of tectonic
processes from topographic analysis has been a key research focus <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx118" id="paren.3"/>, as changes in topographic gradients could record
variations in rock uplift rates at various scales, from regional patterns associated with crustal or lithospheric deformation
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42" id="paren.4"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref> down to differential motion across individual faults <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="paren.5"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>.  Such investigations
have often been motivated by the practical concern of identifying high strain zones in tectonically active regions in order to contribute to seismic
hazard assessment <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx77" id="paren.6"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>.</p>
      <p id="d1e313">These studies have been, by a large margin, dominated by approaches relying on the analysis of river long-profile properties, as a direct relationship
between fluvial gradient and rock uplift has been identified in many incision models <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx111" id="paren.7"/>. Notably, the computation of
morphometric parameters such as steepness indexes, a measure of channel gradient normalized for drainage area <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63" id="paren.8"/>, is now
a standard approach when investigating river networks, as this parameter is theoretically dependent on rock uplift and has been shown to be positively
correlated with field measurements <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39 bib1.bibx118 bib1.bibx26" id="paren.9"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. The great development of these methods has
been made possible by the increasing availability of medium-resolution digital elevation models (DEMs: 10 to 100 m pixel size), which allow for the
reliable extraction of river profiles and accurate computation of along-stream gradients. While robust, efficient and widely used in a variety of
settings, these fluvial-based approaches can encounter important limitations when dealing with complexities of river systems such as lithological
variations, transient evolution or along-stream changes in fluvial dynamics, but they are also inherently constrained by the planform distribution of
river networks, which might not always be optimal to sample the rock uplift patterns.</p>
      <p id="d1e327">Similarly to river profiles, theoretical formulations of hillslope denudation predict a strong dependence of morphological parameters, such as slope
or relief, on the rate of base level fall set by channel incision. However, key elements of hillslope behavior, such as the threshold stability angle
for hillslope material and the nonlinear relationship between sediment fluxes and topographic gradient
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx98 bib1.bibx99 bib1.bibx100" id="paren.10"/>, imply that, for fixed valley spacing, hillslope morphology can be insensitive
to changes in erosion or rock uplift rates over a large range of values <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10 bib1.bibx86" id="paren.11"/>. This behavior is a major
limitation for the use of hillslope morphology to retrieve information about tectonic gradients. Furthermore, from a methodological point of view, the
widely available intermediate-resolution DEMs, which are appropriate to describe river profiles developing over 1–100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> length scales, will
only provide a very coarse description of hillslopes with typical lengths of the order of 100 m <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48" id="paren.12"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e347">Nevertheless, this methodological limitation is currently being overcome by the growing use of lidar or photogrammetric techniques delivering digital
terrain models (DTMs) with resolutions less than 1 m <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx61 bib1.bibx45 bib1.bibx87" id="paren.13"/>. The widespread
distribution of such data has spurred a great interest in new approaches to extract relevant information at the hillslope scale
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30 bib1.bibx56 bib1.bibx49 bib1.bibx50 bib1.bibx75 bib1.bibx23" id="paren.14"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. It is
noteworthy that the high resolution of these DTMs allows users to compute accurate derivatives of the topographic surface. According to linear diffusion
theory, the second derivative, or curvature, covaries with erosion rate. This relationship remains valid for near-threshold hillslopes in the vicinity
of the hilltop where topographic gradients are usually small <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx56" id="paren.15"/>. This possibility to access reliable proxies for erosion rate from
hillslope scale metrics has led researchers to reconsider the potential of hillslope analysis for the assessment of denudation gradients, which can be used to
infer patterns of uplift. Notably, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx100" id="text.16"/> have proposed a conceptual framework, based on a formulation for nonlinear hillslope
sediment flux, which highlights the links between steady-state hillslope morphology and the dynamics of erosion processes as well as the underlying
tectonic or climatic forcings. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx56" id="text.17"/> have built upon this formulation to construct a joint analysis of high-resolution topographic
hillslope metrics and cosmogenic radionuclide (CRN) data in the Sierra Nevada (California). In particular, they used CRN-derived denudation rates to
calibrate the efficiency parameter for hillslope transport processes, and they constrain the distribution of absolute erosion rates from hilltop curvature
measurements. Similarly, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57" id="text.18"/> were able to finely track transient landscape adjustment along the San Andreas Fault where
long-term motion is progressively moving hillslopes in and out of a high-uplift-rate pressure ridge. This localized change in the tectonic boundary
condition is closely recorded by hillslope relief or slope angle and hilltop curvature extracted from lidar data, with the growth and decay phases of
landscape evolution leaving a distinctive signature.</p>
      <?pagebreak page223?><p id="d1e372">These promising results have offered hillslope-based critical insights into the dynamics of transient landscapes, with a spatial density of
information several orders of magnitude higher than what could be resolved with approaches based on the fluvial network. Important methodological
developments were necessary to extract the relevant information from high-resolution DTMs <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="paren.19"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. However, while
theoretically warranted, the applicability of these approaches to explore tectonic gradients has only been tested on a limited number of cases
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57 bib1.bibx59 bib1.bibx23" id="paren.20"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. There is, therefore, an urgent need to further investigate hillslope
morphological response in various types of tectonic settings to unravel the potential of such methods as an alternative or complement to the routinely
applied investigation of river profiles. Additionally, even at high resolution, the analysis of hillslope or river morphological properties can only
deliver estimates of the relative intensity of surface processes, the actual rates and efficiency of which can only be obtained through
geochronological techniques such as cosmogenic nuclides. When facing the growing availability of such data, there is a critical need to assess whether,
and under which circumstances, the high-resolution topographic properties of landscapes and their rates of evolution can both be framed into a coherent
picture on the basis of available theoretical formulations for landscape evolution <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="paren.21"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e388">The objective of our study is to investigate the changes in hillslope morphology, as observed with a lidar DTM, across a rock uplift gradient at the
front of the southwestern Alps, France, and to assess what kind of information can be retrieved concerning the underlying tectonic processes. We also
combine this spatial structure of the landscape with denudation rates derived from cosmogenic nuclides in order to compare the relative spatial
distribution of surface processes and uplift rate inferred from the DTM analysis with absolute values. In the following, we first present the main
features of our working area, the Puimichel Plateau in the Mio-Pliocene Digne-Valensole basin, with a focus on key aspects of its main structures and
history that make it an interesting place to investigate the interactions between tectonic forcings and surface processes response. Then, we introduce
the morphological analysis and cosmogenic nuclide methods we used, and we describe the corresponding datasets produced during this study. Finally, we
discuss the implications of these results in terms of the imprint of tectonic gradients into hillslope morphology, the constraints that can be put on
tectonic structures at depth from high-resolution topographic data and their relationship with denudation rates calculated from cosmogenic nuclide
concentrations.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Setting</title>
      <p id="d1e399">The studied area is located in the southern part of the European Western Alps, where mountain ranges result from a combination of Pyrenean (Late
Cretaceous to Eocene) and Alpine (Neogene) tectonic phases (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>). However, the present-day tectonic activity in the area is
considered to be low, and there is no significant horizontal strain rate resolved from geodetic data, despite the occurrence of earthquakes along
identified tectonic structures <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx62 bib1.bibx113 bib1.bibx84" id="paren.22"/>. Paradoxically, leveling measurements indicate uplift
rates up to 2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the northwestern Alps <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx84" id="paren.23"/>. Focal plane mechanisms show that the inner Alps are
characterized by extensional stresses, whereas the external Alps, including the studied area, are still under compression
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx107 bib1.bibx27" id="paren.24"/>. Within these compressional areas, plateau surfaces at 150–400 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> above the present rivers suggest
active uplift of the Western Alps due in part to flexural isostatic response to Quaternary erosion
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11 bib1.bibx12" id="paren.25"/> and in part to tectonic processes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24 bib1.bibx104" id="paren.26"/>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e447"><bold>(a)</bold> Geological setting of the studied region in SE France (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> BRGM geological map). Black square indicates the position of inset <bold>(b)</bold>. <bold>(b)</bold> Focus on the Mio-Pliocene Valensole Plateau and the main regional tectonic structures. Focal mechanisms from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx82" id="text.27"/>.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://esurf.copernicus.org/articles/8/221/2020/esurf-8-221-2020-f01.jpg"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e482">The flexural history of the Alps is particularly recorded in the Neogene basins at the front of the Western Alps <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="paren.28"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>,
such as the Digne-Valensole basin in the southern Alps <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx73" id="paren.29"/>. The Digne-Valensole basin collected material eroded from the Alps
and transported by the Durance, Bléone, Asse and Verdon rivers (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>). The basin is filled by marine deposits overlain by
conglomerates of the continental Valensole Formation, interpreted as an alluvial fan system prograding southward
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18" id="paren.30"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. Deposition starts with Aquitanian marine sandstone, followed by the continental conglomerate of the
Valensole Formation, which is Serravallian to Tortonian in age at its base and up to the early Pleistocene at its top
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx73 bib1.bibx18 bib1.bibx32 bib1.bibx37" id="paren.31"/>. The eastern edge of the basin is overthrusted by the
Middle Miocene to late Quaternary Digne Nappe <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx69 bib1.bibx101 bib1.bibx44 bib1.bibx53" id="paren.32"/>, and it is
bordered to the west by the NNE-trending Durance seismically active fault, a dextral fault with a reverse west-side-up component
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx101 bib1.bibx25" id="paren.33"/>. The Digne-Valensole basin is of particular interest for the study of the interaction between
tectonics and surface processes because of its structural location and its late Pliocene to Quaternary infill that allows us to demonstrate the
Quaternary activity of several faults within the basin, and along its borders
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16 bib1.bibx96 bib1.bibx25 bib1.bibx52 bib1.bibx53" id="paren.34"/>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e516"><bold>(a)</bold> Location of the studied basins and sampling sites at the western edge of the Puimichel Plateau (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>). White line is the location of the profile used in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>. The numbers denote distance along the profile in kilometers and match the horizontal distance coordinate of Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/>. <bold>(b)</bold> Projection of the summit surface along the profile. Horizontal coordinates are consistent with labels of the cross section in panel <bold>(a)</bold>. <bold>(c)</bold> Red contour lines of the two-way travel times (ms) to the top of Oxfordian black marls from a seismic survey synthesis included in the scientific report of drilling BSS002DWDJ available in the subsurface BSS (Banque du Sous-Sol) database of BRGM. Brown circle indicates the location of the drill site. Dark red dashed lines delineate possible geological structures. Dashed white line is parallel to the main cross section and used as an additional section line in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/>. <bold>(d)</bold> Simplified geological section across the Puimichel Plateau adapted from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38" id="text.35"/>. Note that the orientation of this cross section is slightly different from the geomorphological transect studied here.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://esurf.copernicus.org/articles/8/221/2020/esurf-8-221-2020-f02.jpg"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e555"><bold>(a)</bold> Panorama of the western edge of Puimichel Plateau and the studied basins, viewed from Ganagobie Abbey (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>b for location). <bold>(b)</bold> Hillslope flank covered with regolith clasts. <bold>(c)</bold> Hilltop sampling site K (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>a for location). <bold>(d)</bold> Hilltop sampling site M.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://esurf.copernicus.org/articles/8/221/2020/esurf-8-221-2020-f03.jpg"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e579">The Digne-Valensole basin is dissected by the Bléone and the Asse rivers, which divide the area into three parts: the Valensole Plateau to the south;
the Puimichel Plateau in the middle, which is partly eroded and incised by the Rancure river; and the mountains of the Duye valley to the north. These
rivers also dissected the Valensole basin during the Messinian crisis, when the Mediterranean sea level dropped by about 1500 m
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx102 bib1.bibx55 bib1.bibx16 bib1.bibx19" id="paren.36"/>. In the Valensole<?pagebreak page224?> basin, the Messinian paleocanyons are mostly
buried under Pliocene and early Quaternary sediments. A few sections of these paleocanyons could be mapped near Oraison <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37" id="paren.37"/>
and near Digne <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53" id="paren.38"/>, where the Messinian erosional surface separates the Valensole I and II formations
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32 bib1.bibx17" id="paren.39"/>. The Valensole II formation filled the Messinian canyons and covered the central and southern part of
the Valensole basin <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="paren.40"/>, with its top surface presently forming the Valensole and Puimichel plateaus (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>). The
age of the top surface of these plateaus ranges between 0.7 Ma in the east, near the Digne Thrust <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37" id="paren.41"/>, and 1.7 Ma in the
west, along the Durance river <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32 bib1.bibx34 bib1.bibx35" id="paren.42"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e606">This surface was used by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12" id="text.43"/> as a passively deformed marker to identify long-wavelength tilting of the
Alpine foreland, in part as a response to erosional unloading. At shorter wavelengths, the exceptional preservation of this surface allowed <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52" id="text.44"/> to
demonstrate the Quaternary activity of the Lambruissier anticline (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>a) within the Digne-Valensole basin. This SW-verging fold generated an 80 m high and 5 km long morphological ridge above the Puimichel Plateau
surface. Younger terraces have been mapped in the area <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33" id="paren.45"/>, but due to active erosion and poor preservation of their surfaces
it is not possible to use them as reliable benchmarks to measure finite deformation. To the northeast of the Lambruissier anticline, an older, late
Neogene fold is stratigraphically overlain by horizontal late Pliocene deposits of the Bléone river Messinian canyon
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53" id="paren.46"/>. These ages demonstrate the southward propagation of deformation within the Digne-Valensole basin, which would be
further confirmed if the Mées ramp anticline <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="paren.47"/>, located south of the Lambruissier anticline, was active. This activity is
suggested by (1) elevation anomalies in the Mindel terrace of the Durance river <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41 bib1.bibx33" id="paren.48"/>, (2) the dip of the
Puimichel Plateau surface which is more than 3 times higher (25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) than the dip of the Valensole Plateau (8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52" id="paren.49"/> and (3) the striking asymmetric pattern of the drainage network that may have recorded a progressive tilt of the
Puimichel Plateau <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24 bib1.bibx52" id="paren.50"/>. Recent tectonic deformation of this area is also in agreement with
modeling of the thermal history of the northern tip of the Digne-Valensole basin <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx104" id="paren.51"/>.</p>
      <?pagebreak page226?><p id="d1e674">Our study is specifically focused on the western edge of the Puimichel Plateau, which is dissected by a series of small basins
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>) draining directly into the Durance river. The eastern limit of these basins corresponds to the post-Pliocene abandonment
surface of the summit of the plateau. Seismic surveys and drilling have identified an important uplifted basement structure below this plateau (Mées
Structure, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>d) of Upper Cretaceous to Eocene age, with possible Alpine Miocene reactivation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38" id="paren.52"/>. The
region is characterized by a Mediterranean climate with mean annual temperature (MAT) of 13 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and mean annual precipitation of
700 mm (data at Saint-Auban Météo-France weather station over the 1981–2010 period). The dominant lithology is the Mio-Pliocene Valensole
conglomerate, with an age either pre- or post-Messinian depending on the geometry of erosional surface, which has not been continuously mapped in this
area. However, bedrock geology is uniform, with mostly clast-supported conglomerates, which weather primarily by destruction of the sandy matrix over
a few tens of centimeters below the surface. The clasts (5 to 10 cm in size) are set loose but remain interlocked with little vertical movement and
mixing inside the regolith profile. Once the clasts reach the surface, they are free to move downslope.</p>
      <p id="d1e697">For the hillslope domain, the existence of this extensive mobile regolith cover implies that hillslopes are mostly under transport-limited regime,
which is an important requirement of the topographic analysis described below (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>). Concerning the fluvial network, we did not
observe any large-scale alluviation but only a thin cover of sediment with many occurrences of outcropping unweathered conglomerate bedrock, which
leads us to consider that these streams are mostly under detachment-limited dynamics.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Topographic analysis</title>
      <p id="d1e717">The topographic analysis carried out in this study relies on a 1 m resolution airborne lidar digital terrain model (DTM) acquired in 2014 as part of
the RGE ALTI<sup>®</sup> database from IGN (Institut National de l'information Géographique et Forestière) and covering our study
area, as well as most of the Valensole and Puimichel plateaus. The core of our analysis consists of the extraction of high-resolution hillslope and
channels topographic metrics along a transect located at the northwestern edge of the plateau in order to identify short-wavelength variations in the
distribution of surface processes (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>), as opposed to the long-wavelength deformation investigated by previous studies
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12" id="paren.53"/>.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS1">
  <label>3.1.1</label><title>Hillslope morphology</title>
      <?pagebreak page227?><p id="d1e735">We present here the theoretical background supporting the interpretation of hillslope-scale morphological parameters. Mass conservation across
a steady-state 1-D hillslope profile can be expressed as
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M16" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the horizontal coordinate ([L]), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the sediment flux ([L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>T<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>]), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the rock-to-regolith density ratio
(dimensionless), and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the erosion rate ([LT<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>]) which is equal to the rock uplift rate under steady-state
conditions. Equation (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1"/>) can be combined with a geomorphic transport law <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="paren.54"><named-content content-type="pre">GTL;</named-content></xref>, describing sediment flux
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over a hillslope as a nonlinear function of local hillslope gradient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx98 bib1.bibx100" id="paren.55"/>,
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M26" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is a diffusion coefficient ([L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>T<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>]) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is a critical hillslope gradient <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx98" id="paren.56"/>. For gentle slope
areas, such as in the vicinity of hilltops, Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E2"/>) can be linearly approximated as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Combining this expression of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1"/>) yields a linear relationship between the erosion rate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and the second spatial derivative of topography or
hilltop curvature <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mtext>HT</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><label>3</label><mml:math id="M35" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mtext>HT</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            Equation (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E3"/>) will be central in the interpretation of our results, as it allows us to combine the two types of data acquired at hilltop
sites during this study: high-resolution morphometric measurements (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mtext>HT</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and denudation rates (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) derived from cosmogenic nuclide
concentrations.</p>
      <p id="d1e1054">Combining Eqs. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1"/>) and (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E2"/>) and integrating yields the steady-state elevation profile <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> associated with a spatially
uniform erosion rate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx99" id="paren.57"/>,

                  <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M40" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mfenced close="" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E4"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>4</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mfenced open="" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

              With <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as the hillslope length (horizontal distance from hilltop to channel), a reference erosion rate <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx100" id="paren.58"/>
can be defined as
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E5" content-type="numbered"><label>5</label><mml:math id="M42" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            and similarly a reference relief  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> which represents the maximum hillslope relief can also be defined.</p>
      <p id="d1e1290">These two reference values allow us to normalize hillslope relief <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and erosion rate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> into their nondimensional equivalents as
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E6" content-type="numbered"><label>6</label><mml:math id="M46" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            and, dividing Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E3"/>) by Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E5"/>),
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E7" content-type="numbered"><label>7</label><mml:math id="M47" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mtext>HT</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            Finally, Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E4"/>) can be expressed in nondimensional form:
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E8" content-type="numbered"><label>8</label><mml:math id="M48" display="block"><mml:mtable rowspacing="0.2ex" class="split" columnspacing="1em" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo mathsize="2.5em">(</mml:mo><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo mathsize="2.5em">)</mml:mo><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>
            The purpose of our analysis of the DTM is to extract these various metrics characterizing the relief structure and erosion of hillslopes, and in
particular the hilltop curvature <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mtext>HT</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, as well as hillslope relief <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and length <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. These measurements will then allow us to
compute a nondimensional erosion rate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> according to Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E7"/>). We use the approach presented by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx56" id="text.59"/> and
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="text.60"/>, which we implemented into the GRASS GIS environment <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx81" id="paren.61"/> and R scripting language
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx94" id="paren.62"/>, as described in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47" id="text.63"/> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e1540"><bold>(a)</bold> Hillshade image from a 1 m IGN RGE ALTI<sup>®</sup> lidar digital terrain model (DTM). Thick brown lines indicate the hilltops extracted from the DTM. Light blue polygons are the floodplains extracted using the approach by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22" id="text.64"/>. Thin purple lines are flow lines routed from the hilltop toward the floodplain. <bold>(b)</bold> Corresponding orthophotography (IGN BD ORTHO<sup>®</sup>).</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=384.112205pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://esurf.copernicus.org/articles/8/221/2020/esurf-8-221-2020-f04.jpg"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e1563">First, the DTM was filtered to remove short-wavelength noise using the despeckling algorithm of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx108" id="text.65"/> and its application to DTM
filtering as described in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx106" id="text.66"/>. The river network was extracted using a geometric approach by defining
a 0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> contour curvature threshold for the definition of channel heads <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx88 bib1.bibx20" id="paren.67"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. The
narrow floodplains that are present in our working area were delineated following the approach proposed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22" id="text.68"/>. Hilltops were then
identified as the intersecting margins of basins over all ranges of stream orders, and curvature was computed at every hilltop pixel by fitting
a quadratic surface over a 30 m wide window, which is large enough to filter out short-wavelength surface roughness and small enough to avoid
perturbation from the ridge-and-valley topographic signal <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx56 bib1.bibx46 bib1.bibx50 bib1.bibx67" id="paren.69"/>. Flow was
routed downslope from hilltop pixels to the edge of floodplains using the algorithm of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx76" id="text.70"/>, and the resulting flow lines were
used to compute hillslope relief and length <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx56 bib1.bibx48 bib1.bibx49" id="paren.71"/>. Flow lines and associated data were grouped
into patches of a least 50 contiguous hilltop pixels <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="paren.72"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS2">
  <label>3.1.2</label><title>Channel morphology</title>
      <p id="d1e1615">We also extracted standard metrics from the river profiles of the studied catchments (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>). River incision <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mi>I</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> ([LT<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>])
can be parameterized as a function of along-channel topographic gradient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and drainage area <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> ([L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>]) as
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E9" content-type="numbered"><label>9</label><mml:math id="M59" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is an erodibility coefficient ([L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>T<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>]), and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are empirical exponents
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx54 bib1.bibx115" id="paren.73"/>. Under steady-state conditions, river incision <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mi>I</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> equals rock uplift <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mi>U</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E9"/>)
can be reorganized as
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E10" content-type="numbered"><label>10</label><mml:math id="M67" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close="|" open="|"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mstyle scriptlevel="+1"><mml:mfrac><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle scriptlevel="+1"><mml:mfrac><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            Parameters <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mfrac><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are referred to as the steepness index and channel concavity
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx118 bib1.bibx63" id="paren.74"/>, and they are often determined by regression in a slope–area diagram. Steepness indexes are of particular
interest in tectonic studies, due to their direct dependence upon the rock uplift <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mi>U</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, and, under the assumption of constant erodibility <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, they can
be used to decipher relative spatial variation in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mi>U</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx64" id="paren.75"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. In order to<?pagebreak page228?> allow for a meaningful comparison between channels
of different concavities, a reference <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value is chosen and used in the regression in order to obtain a normalized steepness index <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sn</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e1907"><bold>(a)</bold> River profile for the main trunk and tributaries of the Moureisse catchment (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/> for location). <bold>(b)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> transform of the longitudinal profile <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx90" id="paren.76"/>, using <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.23</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Inset shows the evolution of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the linear regression of elevation against <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for a range of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://esurf.copernicus.org/articles/8/221/2020/esurf-8-221-2020-f05.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e1980">Calculating <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> by differentiating the river long-profile often yields noisy data. Following <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx90" id="text.77"/>, Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E10"/>) can be
integrated from base level, at position <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> as
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E11" content-type="numbered"><label>11</label><mml:math id="M83" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∫</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mstyle scriptlevel="+1"><mml:mfrac><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            Under the assumption that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mi>U</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are spatially constant, Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E11"/>) becomes
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E12" content-type="numbered"><label>12</label><mml:math id="M86" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mstyle scriptlevel="+1"><mml:mfrac><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is a reference drainage area, with
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E13" content-type="numbered"><label>13</label><mml:math id="M88" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∫</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mstyle scriptlevel="+1"><mml:mfrac><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            Equation (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E12"/>) implies that in a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> vs. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> diagram a steady-state channel profile should plot a straight line, with a slope
proportional to steepness index.</p>
      <p id="d1e2227">For every investigated basin, we searched the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value (concavity) leading to the best linearization of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-transformed river profile
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx90" id="paren.78"/>. We fixed the reference value according to the mean of observed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value across all basins. We then again
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-transformed the river profiles using this reference <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to compute normalized steepness indexes.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Cosmogenic nuclides</title>
      <p id="d1e2294">The topographic analysis methods described in the previous section allow us to identify relative spatial patterns for the intensity of surface
processes such as surface denudation, which can be used to infer rock uplift distribution. We used in situ-produced cosmogenic nuclide concentration
measurements to constrain the absolute denudation rate values. Active fluvial sediments are present along the stream network of the studied catchments
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>a), and they could be sampled to derive basin averaged denudation rates <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx112" id="paren.79"/>. However, most of the
surveyed channels displayed complex dynamics with localized occurrences of aggradation, splitting of the main channel and local colluvial inputs, such
that the required hypothesis of a homogeneous contribution of the whole upstream area was most likely invalid. For that reason, we rather sampled
material directly at the hilltops, which allows for a clear identification of the origin of the sampled material and a straightforward comparison with the
topographic metrics extracted from the high-resolution DTM. As noted earlier, weathering principally affects the sandy matrix of the conglomerate,
liberating the clasts which remain interlocked until they reach the surface, such that vertical mixing within the regolith is minimal at the hilltop.</p>
      <p id="d1e2302">Samples for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Be</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">26</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration measurements were collected at 10 hilltop sites, by amalgamating 30 to 40 individual
sandstone clasts derived from the bedrock conglomerate (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>a). Samples were crushed and sieved to extract the
250–1000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m fraction, which was submitted to sequential magnetic separation. The remaining fraction was leached with 37 % HCl to remove
carbonate fragments. The samples were then repetitively leached with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SiF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and submitted to vigorous mechanical shaking until pure quartz
was obtained. Decontamination from atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Be</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was<?pagebreak page229?> achieved by a series of three successive leaching processes in concentrated HF, each removing
10 % of the remaining sample mass <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="paren.80"/>. After addition of an in-house <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Be</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> carrier, the samples were digested in
concentrated HF. Be and Al were isolated for measurements using ion-exchange chromatography. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Be</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Be</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">26</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">27</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements were performed at the French AMS National Facility, located at CEREGE in Aix-en-Provence. All results and
technical characteristics of the measurements and calculations are provided in Tables <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e2435">Cosmogenic nuclide <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Be</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> results.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="9">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sample</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Latitude</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Longitude</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Altitude</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Mass<inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Be carrier<inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Be</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Be</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mtext>c,d,e</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">[<inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Be</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>d,f</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Be</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> denudation rate<inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>d,g</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(m)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(g)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(g)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atoms</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kyr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">TV-F</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">43.9675</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5.9476</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">482</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">18.88</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.1556</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">4.43 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">71.36 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.67</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">61.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6.6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">TV-G</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">44.006</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5.991</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">728</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">14.74</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.1518</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">3.83 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">76.58 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">69 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 9.25</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">TV-H</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">44.0032</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5.977</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">644</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">19.87</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.1523</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">3.29 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">48.65 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.39</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">102 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12.91</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">TV-I</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">44.0014</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5.9707</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">614</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">18.24</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.1555</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">4.67 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.17</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">77.99 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.95</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">62 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6.73</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">TV-K</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">43.9964</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5.9859</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">720</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">19.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.1522</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">3.74 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.18</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">57.52 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.88</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">91.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 11.68</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">TV-M</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">43.9953</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5.9705</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">616</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">16.38</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.1529</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">3.15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">57.68 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.05</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">84.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 11.18</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">TV-N</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">43.9805</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5.9626</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">559</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">19.49</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.1455</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">5.81 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.21</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">86.23 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.22</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">53.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5.8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">TV-O</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">43.9779</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5.9684</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">644</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">18.58</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.1547</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">3.57 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">58.48 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.82</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">84.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10.61</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">TV-P</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">43.9748</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5.971</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">644</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">19.65</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.1539</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2.83 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.11</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">43.28 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.82</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">115 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 13.21</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">TV-R</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">43.9687</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5.9664</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">647</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">19.34</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.1408</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">8.07 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.29</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">117.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.36</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">42.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.54</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e2450">
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Dissolved pure quartz mass.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> In-house carrier mass, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 150 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 3.025 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx72" id="paren.81"/>.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Be</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Be</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios were calibrated against the National Institute of Standards and Technology standard reference material 4325 by using an assigned value of 2.79 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03<inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx83" id="paren.82"/>.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Uncertainties are reported at the 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> level.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Uncertainties on isotopic ratios are calculated according to the standard error propagation method using the quadratic sum of the relative errors and include a conservative 0.5 % external machine uncertainty <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="paren.83"/>, the uncertainty on the certified standard ratio, a 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> uncertainty associated with the mean of the standard ratio measurements during the measurement cycles, a 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> statistical error on counted events and the uncertainty associated with the chemical and analytical blank corrections.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Two process blanks were treated and measured  with our samples, yielding  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Be</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Be</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios of 1.47 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.27 and 0.90 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.29 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.
It corresponds to an upper 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> bound of 55 and 38 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Be</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> atoms for the background level in these two blanks, which is at least 20 times lower than the number of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Be</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> atoms in the dissolved sample masses (30 times lower on average over our dataset).
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Denudation rates were then calculated with the online calculator described in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="text.84"/> and the nuclide-specific LSD (Lifton–Sato–Dunai) scaling scheme <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx70" id="paren.85"/>, using the CRONUS-Earth calibration dataset <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="paren.86"/> for the calculation of spallation production rates and muon production rates according to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2" id="text.87"/>.
We use 160 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the effective attenuation length for spallation in rock and a density of 2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
No shielding correction was considered for the hilltop sites we sampled, which were selected on nearly horizontal ridgelines.
</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d1e3564">Cosmogenic nuclide <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">26</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> results and comparison with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Be</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> results from Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="8">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sample</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">[Al]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">26</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">27</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mtext>b,c</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">[<inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">26</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>c,d</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">26</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> denudation rate<inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>c,e</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">26</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Be</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">26</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(ppm)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atoms</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kyr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(kyr)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">TV-F</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">173.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.33 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">489.13 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 41.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">58.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12.23</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">10.5–10.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">6.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">TV-G</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">118.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.02 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.29</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">517.65 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 77.39</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">68.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 22.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">9.3–9.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">6.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">TV-H</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">136.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.29 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.12</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">371.72 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 39.07</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">87.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 21.28</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">6.3–7.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">7.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">TV-I</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">131.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.21 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.26</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">628.49 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 76.26</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">51.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 14.04</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">10.3–12.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">8.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">TV-K</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">151</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.47 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.19</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">471.82 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 64.22</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">73.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 22</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">7–8.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">8.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">TV-M</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">144.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.38 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.13</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">421.92 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 41.63</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">75.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 17.53</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">7.6–8.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">7.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">TV-N</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">139.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.16 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">651.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 49.63</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">47.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 9.18</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">11.9–13.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">7.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">TV-O</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">154.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.21 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.14</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">391.25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50.46</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">82.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 23.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">7.5–7.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">6.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">TV-P</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">149.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.91 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.08</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">280.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 28.33</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">114 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 26.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">5.6–5.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">6.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">TV-R</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">186.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.16 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.13</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">866.88 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 57.51</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">37.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">15.2–17</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">7.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e3593">
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Naturally occurring Al measured by ICP-OES (inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry). No Al carrier solution was added to the samples.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> The measured <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">26</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">27</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios were normalized to the in-house standard SM-Al-11 whose ratio of 7.401 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.064 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="paren.88"/> has been cross-calibrated against primary standards from a round-robin exercise <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx71" id="paren.89"/>.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Uncertainties are reported at the 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> level.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> An analytical blank yielded a ratio of 7.27 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.17 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Procedures for that calculation of denudation rates are identical to the ones described in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Integration timescales for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Be</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">26</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> denudation rates <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx112" id="paren.90"/>.
</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Surface deformation modeling</title>
      <p id="d1e4671">Under the assumption that the spatial distribution in erosion rates results from tectonic forcing, observations of absolute or relative variations in
the intensity of surface processes are commonly used to derive information on rock uplift patterns and the geometry of associated structures
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx118 bib1.bibx103 bib1.bibx68" id="paren.91"/>. While the key hypothesis of a tectonic origin for the variability in erosion
proxies will need to be discussed in detail, we present here a modeling approach which can be used to interpret surface erosion patterns, which are considered proxies for rock uplift, in terms of the associated structures at depth.</p>
      <p id="d1e4677">We use a simple elastic dislocation model <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx85" id="paren.92"/> to predict surface deformation distributions and compare them with our observed
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> evolution along the investigated profile (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>). This type of modeling approach is usually associated with the study of
upper crustal deformation during the seismic cycle, but it has also been successfully applied to interpret surface deformation patterns
associated with blind thrusts over longer timescales <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx114 bib1.bibx6 bib1.bibx79" id="paren.93"/>. As noted by
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx79" id="text.94"/>, who used elastic dislocation modeling to study folding in the Los Angeles Basin, it allows us to keep track, at first order,
of the displacement of material associated with the activation of the fault, independently of the mechanical parameters. We consider a single planar
dislocation embedded in an elastic medium. We define its geometry with four parameters: the horizontal position and depth of its upper limit (varying
from 0 to 20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> along the profile and from 0 to 10 below the surface, respectively), dip angle (varying from 0 to 90<inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and length
(varying from 0 to 4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). This set of four parameters allows us to predict a surface deformation profile which is compared to the observed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
pattern. We do not fit the absolute value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which has no significance with respect to the elastic dislocation model, but rather we fit the wavelength
of the predicted deformation and simply scale its amplitude to that of the observed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> profile.</p>
      <p id="d1e4761">We use a standard Monte Carlo Markov Chain (MCMC) approach to move through this parameter space and estimate the posterior distributions
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx74" id="paren.95"/>. The consecutive displacements during the sampling procedure were driven by the Metropolis–Hastings algorithm, with an
acceptance rate of 20 %. We ran 16 independent chains, each <inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in length with a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> length burn-in phase. The multivariate potential scale
reduction factor is 1.004, suggesting that convergence was achieved <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43" id="paren.96"/>.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Data</title>
      <p id="d1e4801">In this section we present the primary data acquired during this study and the associated direct observations. The interpretations built on these
datasets are developed and discussed in the next section.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <label>4.1</label><title>Topographic analysis</title>
      <p id="d1e4811">Most hillslope profiles display a clear convexity and progressive downward increase in slope, with almost linear portions at the bottom of the
hillslope and gradients close to 0.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>a). Calculation of average hillslope gradient shows that most
hillslopes have average gradients below 0.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>b). Following <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx59" id="text.97"/>, we determined the value of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for which 99 % of hillslopes have a relief inferior to the maximum value (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and obtained
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.52</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In the following we use <inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the critical gradient value
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>c). This <inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value is lower than what was found in other settings <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="paren.98"/>, but it is
close to the natural angle of repose in many granular materials (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30<inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). We note that two particularities of our study area are the
nature of the regolith, which is mostly constituted of highly mobile conglomerate-derived clasts moving downslope by both creep and dry ravel, and the
isolated vegetation providing little cohesion (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>b), as opposed to the finer-grained soils supporting denser root networks observed
in many other similar studies. Most topographic metrics extracted at the hillslope scale display important variations along the studied profile, both
in terms of basin averaged or binned values. Nondimensional erosion rate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increases 2-fold from south to north (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>a). This
variation is not evenly distributed along the profile but occurs over less than 4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of horizontal distance. The hilltop curvature
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mtext>HT</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pattern closely mimics that of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, increasing from 0.01 to 0.02 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>b). For both metrics,
basin averaged<?pagebreak page231?> values are highly consistent from one catchment to the other and delineate a clear trend along the section, with the exception of one
outlying small catchment at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> distance. The evolution of hillslope relief is less pronounced but also shows an increase from
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 40 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 60 m (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>c). On the contrary, no clear systematic changes in hillslope length can be observed along the
profile, with values ranging from 140 to 160 m (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>c).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e5079"><bold>(a)</bold> Selected hillslope profiles from the studied basins (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>). Grey lines indicate topographic gradient values. <bold>(b)</bold> Distributions of hillslope average topographic gradient for all the studied basins (solid line) and five northernmost basins (dashed line) where relief <inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, hilltop curvature <inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mtext>HT</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and nondimensional erosion rate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the highest (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>). <bold>(c)</bold> Joint distribution of hillslope relief and length for the flow lines extracted from the studied basins (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>). Grey lines indicate topographic gradient values.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://esurf.copernicus.org/articles/8/221/2020/esurf-8-221-2020-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F7"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e5134">Projection of hillslope and fluvial parameters along the profile of Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>. The horizontal distance values used here match the distance measured along the profile in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>. For all panels, open symbols refer to basin averaged values (location of basins in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>) and closed symbols to 1 km length bin averages along the profile (error bars are <inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>). <bold>(a)</bold> Evolution of nondimensional erosion rate calculated as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mtext>HT</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx100" id="paren.99"/>. <bold>(b)</bold> Hilltop curvature computed over 15 m radius window. <bold>(c)</bold> Hillslope length and relief from the flow-line patches (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>). <bold>(d)</bold> Normalized steepness index and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio (concavity, reference value of 0.25) extracted from channel profiles of the studied basins.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=216.240945pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://esurf.copernicus.org/articles/8/221/2020/esurf-8-221-2020-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e5227">For all studied basins, the river profiles display a regular concave-up shape, and in most situations <inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-transformed main trunk profiles, as well as
the main tributaries, collapse along a linear trend, suggesting the absence of a major transient perturbation propagating through the river network
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>). Small tributaries usually show higher dispersion due to changes in processes in small colluvial valleys. Usual
topographic indexes, such as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio and normalized steepness index (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sn</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), were extracted from the fluvial network. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio ranges
from 0.2 to 0.4, with an average of 0.24 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.06, and a reference value of 0.25 was used in the following analysis. While this <inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value is
lower than the often reported 0.4 to 0.5 ratio, it is within the range of observations from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51" id="text.100"/> for high erodibility lithologies,
such as the setting we consider here. These fluvial metrics display a larger amount of scatter from one basin to another when compared with the
patterns extracted from the hillslope morphology analysis (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>d). However, it can be noted that the four northernmost basins display
higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sn</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values than the rest of the section, and that basin averaged <inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sn</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are significantly positively correlated
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8"><?xmltex \currentcnt{8}?><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d1e5337">Evolution of basin averaged <inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as a function of normalized steepness index (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sn</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Circles are colored according to the position of the corresponding basins along the transect (Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>). Circle radius is a function of catchment size (ranging from 0.5 to 4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). Solid and dashed lines correspond to a linear fit and its 95 % confidence interval (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.62</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=227.622047pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://esurf.copernicus.org/articles/8/221/2020/esurf-8-221-2020-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <label>4.2</label><title>Cosmogenic nuclide data</title>
      <p id="d1e5430">Measured concentrations in our hilltop samples range from 43 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">117</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atoms</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 281 to 867<inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atoms</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Be</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">26</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively (Tables <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>). The corresponding <inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">26</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Be</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios
vary from 6.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.8 to 8.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.2. While some of these ratios are slightly higher than the theoretical value, confidence ellipses are
always overlapping the steady-state denudation curve (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>). These concentrations correspond to denudation rates ranging from 42 to
115 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kyr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and from 38 to 114 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kyr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Be</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">26</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively (Tables <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>
and <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>). The denudation rates calculated from both nuclide concentrations are consistent but display a small deviation from the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
line, with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">26</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> denudation rates slightly lower than their <inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Be</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> equivalents. The observed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">26</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Be</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values
argue against a significant contribution of an inherited CRN inventory from the history of the clasts prior to their deposition inside the Valensole
conglomerate, in particular if they derived from the Valensole II formation. In the following we only consider <inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Be</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> data for our analysis of
the relationship between high-resolution topography and denudation rates, due to their lower uncertainty.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{9}?><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d1e5698"><bold>(a)</bold> Two nuclides plot for the sampled sites, with 68 % confidence ellipses (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/> for location and Tables <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/> for data). Solid and dashed brown lines indicate the predicted <inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">26</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Be</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio for steady-state denudation and constant exposure histories, respectively. <bold>(b)</bold> Comparison of denudation rates calculated from measured <inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Be</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">26</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations using the LSD scaling scheme <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx70" id="paren.101"/> and calculation procedure from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="text.102"/>. Blue line and envelope are linear fit and its 95 % confidence interval, respectively.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=355.659449pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://esurf.copernicus.org/articles/8/221/2020/esurf-8-221-2020-f09.png"/>

        </fig>

<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5">
  <label>5</label><title>Discussion</title>
      <p id="d1e5783">We now discuss the morphological and geochronological data presented in the previous section in terms of the main controls on hillslope morphology,
the relationship between hillslope and channel properties, the geometry of the underlying tectonic structures, and the comparison between
morphological observations and denudation rates at the same sites.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS1">
  <label>5.1</label><title>Interpretation of the spatial variability in hillslope morphology</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS1.SSS1">
  <label>5.1.1</label><title>Possible controls on hillslope morphology</title>
      <p id="d1e5800">We observe a pronounced and systematic variation of hillslope morphology along the studied transect, with hillslope curvature <inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mtext>HT</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
undergoing a 2-fold increase from S to N (between 7 and 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>b). We evaluate below the possible controls on this
evolution. We first note that our study area extends over <inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in length, with catchment average elevation and relief ranging from
460 to 620 m and from 100 to 300 m, respectively. These limited changes in elevation imply that climatic conditions can be considered constant in
terms of mean annual precipitation and temperature (MAP and MAT), and they cannot account for the observed variations in hillslope morphology. Vegetation
cover is also homogeneous over the western flank of the Puimichel Plateau, with a forest dominated by <italic>Quercus pubescens</italic> and occurrences of
<italic>Quercus ilex</italic> and <italic>Pinus sylvestris</italic>. Similarly, the investigated basins are eroding into Mio-Pliocene conglomerates with no major
changes in the nature and properties of the bedrock or regolith material. We note that this homogeneity of geological, climatic and biological
properties over the transect is a specificity of our studied area, and this might not be warranted in other settings, where eventual disparities in these
properties might complicate the interpretation of fluvial and hillslopes morphologies.</p>
      <p id="d1e5849">Hillslopes have been shown to record transient waves of erosion propagating through landscapes
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx56 bib1.bibx57 bib1.bibx78" id="paren.103"/>. The series of studied basins are directly connected to the Durance river base level, and
the eventual propagation of incision pulses and along-stream knickpoints might impact the network of tributaries and adjacent hillslopes, inducing
a differential hillslope response <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx56" id="paren.104"/>. However, several lines of evidence argue against such control on the observed distribution
of hillslope properties. First, no major knickpoints have been identified along the Durance river in the vicinity of our working area. Second, we note
that the pattern of evolution for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mtext>HT</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> along the transect is characterized by almost constant values for 6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
followed by a rapid increase over less than 4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, rather than the progressive variations that would be expected to result from the propagation
of a knickpoint in front of the western edge of the plateau. At last, we note that the<?pagebreak page232?> propagation of an incision wave would result in a pattern with
higher erosion areas in the southern part connected to the adjusted or adjusting landscape downstream of the propagating incision pulse, and slower
erosion in the northern yet unaffected areas, which is exactly contrary to what we observe here. Therefore, we propose that the observed pattern is
unlikely to result from the transient adjustment of the landscape to the propagation of a wave of incision along the Durance river.</p>
      <p id="d1e5904">Another possibility to generate the observed distribution of hillslope parameters would be a sustained differential rock-uplift pattern associated
with recent or ongoing<?pagebreak page233?> deformation. Several studies have already pointed at geomorphic evidence for recent tectonic activity in the northern part of
the Puimichel Plateau <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24 bib1.bibx52" id="paren.105"/>, which is confirmed by recent seismic activity
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx82" id="paren.106"/>, with several magnitude-4 thrust-slip events with E–W strike directions (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>b). Notably, a major
inflection of the abandonment surface occurs at 7–8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of horizontal distance along the transect (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>b), suggesting
post-Pliocene uplift of the northern part. The location of this surface inflection coincides with the transition area for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mtext>HT</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>). Such spatial coherence between a long-term finite deformation pattern passively recorded at 1 Myr timescale by the summit
surface, and the shorter-term active erosional response of the landscape observed through hillslope morphometric indices, argue for a control by
differential uplift rates across the transect.</p>
      <p id="d1e5957">Additionally, we note that this transition zone is also coincident with the southern flank of a major basement uplift, identified by seismic surveys,
located below the northern part of the Puimichel Plateau (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>c and d). This uplifted basement is a long-lasting structure formed during the Pyrenean orogeny and is associated with basement thrusts on its southern edge, at the location of the observed
geomorphic transition <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38" id="paren.107"/>. Quaternary reactivation of such faults has been invoked to explain the surface deformation pattern
of the plateau farther to the north <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52" id="paren.108"/>, and we propose a dominant tectonic control for the distribution of proxies
for surface denudation along our transect (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>).</p>
      <p id="d1e5971">The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vs. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> relationship (with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) shows that the studied catchments plot slightly below the line denoting steady state
predicted by Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E8"/>) (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/>), indicating possible decaying dynamics of the landscape toward lower relief, likely due
to a change in the climatic or tectonic boundary condition <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx78" id="paren.109"/>. All catchments appear to be similarly affected, with no obvious
gradient between the northern and southern ones. For that reason, this decay is not likely to result from a decrease in the amount of differential
rock uplift across the transect, but it could be associated with a regional change in the intensity of the top-down forcing of climatic origin, which
would modify the value of the diffusion coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. However, we note that using <inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which appears to be reasonable for the
vast majority of the studied hillslopes (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>), reduces considerably the deviation from the line denoting steady state.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F10"><?xmltex \currentcnt{10}?><label>Figure 10</label><caption><p id="d1e6079">Basin averaged <inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vs. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> plot <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx100 bib1.bibx49" id="paren.110"/>. Two values for the critical hillslope gradient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are tested. Open circles correspond to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, colored according to the position of the basins along the transect (Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>). Small dark filled circles correspond to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Pale yellow symbols are averages over hilltop patches, for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (see text for details). Thick grey line corresponds to the steady-state relationship between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> predicted by Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E8"/>).</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://esurf.copernicus.org/articles/8/221/2020/esurf-8-221-2020-f10.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS1.SSS2">
  <label>5.1.2</label><title>Constraints on tectonic structures from hillslope morphology</title>
      <p id="d1e6258">As discussed in the previous section, the hypothesis that the evolution of hillslope morphology along the studied transect (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>)
results from a spatial variation of rock uplift is supported by several lines of evidence and notably the presence of a coincident major warping of
the Pliocene abandonment surface of the plateau. Here we develop further the interpretation of this surface deformation pattern in order to put
constraints on the geometry of the associated structures. We use the dislocation modeling approach presented above to constrain the geometry of
a fault whose displacement could explain the observed change in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> along the transect (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>) through an inversion procedure. The
parameters characterizing this fault geometry are the horizontal position and depth of the upper tip of the fault, its dip angle, and its length
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/>).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F11" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{11}?><label>Figure 11</label><caption><p id="d1e6280"><bold>(a)</bold> Nondimensional erosion rate evolution from hilltop patches (mean and standard deviation binned every 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Red curve is the result of the optimization of a simple dislocation model <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx85" id="paren.111"/>, with amplitude adjusted to the range of E<inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> values. See text for details. <bold>(b)</bold> Projection of the deformed summit surface of the Puimichel Plateau (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>b). <bold>(c)</bold> Two-way travel times to the top of Oxfordian black marls, interpolated from seismic surveys across the studied area, as indicated in the report of drilling BSS002DWDJ available in the subsurface BSS database of BRGM. Data are projected onto the section indicated as a dashed white line in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>c. <bold>(d)</bold> Geometry of the dislocation (black line) used to compute the surface deflection on panel <bold>(a)</bold> (red curve). Dashed lines (position and depth of the fault upper end) and light red surface (fault dip angle) correspond to 68 % density intervals from the marginal distributions of panel <bold>(e)</bold>. Thin dark lines indicate the limits of the geological units from the cross section presented in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>d <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38" id="paren.112"/>. <bold>(e)</bold> Marginal distributions from a MCMC exploration for the parameters of the elastic dislocation model.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=327.206693pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://esurf.copernicus.org/articles/8/221/2020/esurf-8-221-2020-f11.png"/>

          </fig>

      <?pagebreak page234?><p id="d1e6340">We observe that the horizontal position of the top of the fault is the best constrained parameter with a most likely value around 8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (same
horizontal reference frame as the profile in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>). The most likely depth for the upper limit of the dislocation is around
2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the suggested dip of the structure is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50<inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The length of the dislocation is not well constrained by our inversion.</p>
      <p id="d1e6378">Interestingly, the suggested horizontal position for the upper tip of the dislocation is close to the major deflection of the Pliocene abandonment
surface, imaged by the lidar data (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/>b). The high-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> northern part of the studied transect roughly corresponds to the Mées
Structure identified from seismic surveys and drilling <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38" id="paren.113"/>, which is a large anticline inherited from the
Late Cretaceous–Eocene compression of the Pyrenean phase (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>b). We note that the suggested horizontal position of the
dislocation is also coincident with the southern flank of the structure and the complex of thrusts responsible for the folding. Some of these thrusts
correspond to reactivated high-angle basement structures, which is in agreement with the inferred dip angle of the dislocation. The depth of at least
2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the top of the dislocation is also consistent with the observation that the Mio-Pliocene reflectors do not display major offsets in
the available seismic data <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38" id="paren.114"/>, and that the Cenozoic formations underwent long-wavelength folding rather than localized
faulting. Overall, the geometry of the structure constrained by our simple model is compatible with the activity of steep south-verging inherited
structures, affecting the basement and Mesozoic series, and the Quaternary reactivation which induced a long-wavelength warping of the Mio-Pliocene
cover and differential uplift along our transect. We note that several other recently active structures have been documented farther to the north,
corresponding to similarly oriented south-verging thrust-and-fold systems, such as the Lambrussier anticline which affects the northern edge of the
Puimichel Plateau <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52" id="paren.115"/>. The amount of finite deformation accommodated by these folds progressively decreases southward,
such that the structure we identified could correspond to the most recently activated as an in-sequence system. Finally, while high-resolution
hillslope morphology analysis has already been used to constrain rock uplift patterns in a limited number of studies
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57 bib1.bibx59 bib1.bibx23" id="paren.116"/>, our results are the first to illustrate the use of such data to infer the
geometry of tectonic structures at depth.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS2">
  <label>5.2</label><title>Hillslopes and channel dynamics</title>
      <p id="d1e6426">Interestingly, parameters extracted from the analysis of river long-profiles such as steepness indexes, which are commonly used to decipher tectonic
patterns in erosional landscapes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63" id="paren.117"/>, do not display as clear a pattern as hillslope metrics
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>d). Normalized steepness index values (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sn</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) are on average higher in the northern part of the transect with respect
to the southern part and positively correlated with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>), but the data are scattered and we do not observe a clear progressive
increase comparable to what is displayed by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mtext>HT</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In each of the studied basins, the main trunk and its tributaries display
regular concave-up profiles, which collapse along a single trend in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> plots (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>). This observation suggests that, at
the scale of each catchment, the river network is globally equilibrated with respect to a common rock uplift rate <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx90" id="paren.118"/>, and
argues against the impact of local perturbation along the river profile as an origin for the observed scatter. An underlying assumption of our river
profile analysis is that the streams behave as purely detachment-limited systems. While our field survey did not allow us to identify thick alluvial
cover along the stream network, local and intermittent shifts toward transport-limited behavior could explain the apparent subdued response of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sn</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> across the inferred rock uplift gradient. We note, however, that in such a situation, stream concavity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) should display some
sensitivity to changes in rock uplift <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx117" id="paren.119"/>, which is not observed here (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>d).</p>
      <p id="d1e6522">A key difference between the two approaches is the very high spatial density of the metrics extracted for the hillslope dataset, which is several
orders of magnitude denser than the evaluation of steepness index and concavity at 18 basins. This comparison illustrates the resolving power of
high-resolution hillslope morphology analysis, which allows us to document short-wavelength patterns of erosion and uplift that are undersampled by
scarcely distributed fluvial metrics. We note that <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx59" id="text.120"/> observed a clear<?pagebreak page235?> response of both hillslope and channel metrics across
the tectonic gradient they studied in the vicinity of the San Andreas Fault. Two important differences compared to our study are the existence of transient
channel adjustment along the Bolinas Ridge and the dimension of the section, which is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> long in their case compared to the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of our profile. Combined with a longer wavelength of the underlying tectonic signal, this latter difference might be a reason
for the better sampling through fluvial metrics by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx59" id="text.121"/>, and the clearer relationship they observe with hillslope properties.</p>
      <p id="d1e6562">One prominent feature of the hillslope evolution across the rock-uplift gradient is the lack of significant changes in hillslope length, contrasting
with the other extracted metrics (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>). Hillslope length, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, remains nearly constant across the transect between 140 and
160 m, whereas hilltop curvature, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mtext>HT</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which can be considered a proxy for erosion and rock uplift under a steady-state assumption,
undergoes a nearly 2-fold increase. There is no significant inverse correlation between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mtext>HT</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as observed by
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx58" id="text.122"/>. The characteristic horizontal length scale of landscapes, which can be evaluated through different types of measurements
such as drainage density, spacing of first-order valleys or hillslope length, has been shown to be highly sensitive to external tectonic and climatic
forcings, as well as internal parameters controlling erosion processes
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx91 bib1.bibx89 bib1.bibx21 bib1.bibx59" id="paren.123"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. For example, <?pagebreak page236?><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="text.124"/> studied
in detail the relationship between denudation rate and drainage density with analytical and numerical models as well as high-resolution topographic
and cosmogenic nuclide data. They show a sensitivity of drainage density to erosion rates, which is very pronounced in the 50–100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kyr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
range corresponding to our CRN data (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>) and conflicts with the observation of a nearly constant <inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> along our
transect. However, this relationship is highly dependent on the parameters used for the fluvial and hillslope erosion laws, as shown by the
formulation of the landscape Péclet number proposed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx92 bib1.bibx93" id="text.125"/> as the ratio between characteristic fluvial
and hillslope timescales:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E14" content-type="numbered"><label>14</label><mml:math id="M389" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ζ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M390" display="inline"><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the erodibility parameter for fluvial incision; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M391" display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> the hillslope diffusion coefficient; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M393" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are the area and slope exponents of the
fluvial incision law, respectively; and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M394" display="inline"><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M395" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ζ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are horizontal and vertical length scales for the landscape. In the special case where the slope
exponent <inline-formula><mml:math id="M396" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of the stream power formulation for river incision is equal to 1, this Péclet number becomes independent from relief <inline-formula><mml:math id="M397" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ζ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, and hence
uplift rate. Considering <inline-formula><mml:math id="M398" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> allows us to retrieve <inline-formula><mml:math id="M399" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as a characteristic length scale for hillslope or channel transition, which again, in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M400" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
case, does not depend on erosion or uplift rates. Therefore, the stability of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M401" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> across a two-fold erosion rate gradient, observed in
our dataset, would hint toward a value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M402" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> close to unity. While the ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M403" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can usually be constrained from the measured concavity of river
profiles, the absolute values of the slope and area exponents of the stream power description for fluvial incision are debated, with many pieces of evidence
pointing to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M404" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29 bib1.bibx65 bib1.bibx51" id="paren.126"/>. However, it is noteworthy that values closer to unity have often been
reported for high-erodibility sediments <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51" id="paren.127"/> or small catchments affected by colluvial processes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx66" id="paren.128"/>,
which are both notable characteristics of the area we investigate. In any case, our study clearly illustrates the potential of high-resolution
hillslope morphological properties to resolve short-wavelength variations in rock uplift that are difficult to capture from the conventional methods
based on fluvial profile analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS3">
  <label>5.3</label><title>Comparison of cosmogenic nuclide data with high-resolution topography metrics</title>
      <p id="d1e6866">Our understanding of landscape dynamics relies on the formulation of geomorphic transport laws (GTLs), such as Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E2"/>), as the
foundation of landscape evolution models <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="paren.129"/>. In most situations such models can be expressed as a differential equation
involving spatial and temporal derivatives of the topographic surface elevation. More precisely, these equations will often relate the spatial
structure of the landscape involving topographic slope or curvature with its rate of evolution as, for example, hillslope denudation rate or fluvial
incision. Evaluating the relevance of such models requires obtaining actual measurements for these spatial and temporal descriptions of the
landscape. Spatial properties of landscapes are usually derived from the analysis of DEMs at various resolutions, from which topographic gradient and
curvature can be computed.  On the other hand, geochronology techniques, such as cosmogenic nuclide concentration measurements in bedrock or sediment
samples, allow for constraining the rate of lowering of the topographic surface though time and provide the framework to evaluate the temporal component
of the landscape evolution problem.</p>
      <p id="d1e6874">For example, the comparison of catchment-wide denudation rates (CWDRs) calculated from measured <inline-formula><mml:math id="M405" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Be</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations in river sediments with
topographic gradient extracted from digital elevation models has provided critical tests of GTLs for hillslope sediment flux
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx86" id="paren.130"/>. While not often explicitly formulated in terms of the evaluation of a GTL, this kind of connection between some spatial
property of landscapes (slope, relief, steepness index, etc.) and their rates of evolution is now standard in CWDR studies. However, it is to be
noted that the interpretation of CRN concentrations in river sediments in terms of spatially averaged denudation rates suffers from important
limitations resulting from the heterogeneity and stochasticity of erosion processes in space and time
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx119" id="paren.131"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. Furthermore, the overwhelming majority of these studies rely on the evaluation of topographic metrics derived
from medium-resolution DEMs (pixel size <inline-formula><mml:math id="M406" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 m) for which the computation of the spatial derivatives controlling erosion rates and sediment fluxes
is inaccurate at the scale of hillslopes.  Only a handful of studies have actually attempted to reconcile CRN-based denudation data with topographic
metrics extracted from high-resolution DTMs into a GTL-based physical framework
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30 bib1.bibx56 bib1.bibx58 bib1.bibx46 bib1.bibx47 bib1.bibx80" id="paren.132"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F12" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{12}?><label>Figure 12</label><caption><p id="d1e6911"><bold>(a)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M407" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Be</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> denudation rate against hilltop curvature. Dashed lines correspond to Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E3"/>) for different values of the diffusion coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M408" display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. <bold>(b)</bold> Computed diffusion coefficient according to Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E3"/>) at the various sites and corresponding probability density function. <bold>(c)</bold> Orange bars indicate the evolution of denudation rates along the profile from Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>, calculated by sampling the distribution from the previous inset and applying Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E3"/>) to individual hillslope patches. White squares are median values and orange bars indicate the interquartile range. Dashed horizontal lines delineate the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M409" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M410" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kyr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> differential denudation rate across the transect. For comparison, light blue circles indicate the denudation rates actually measured at hilltop sites (excluding site P). These rates are systematically higher than those computed from Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E3"/>) and the evolution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M411" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mtext>HT</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>b, because sampling sites where selected on relatively high-curvature ridges, higher than 0.02 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M412" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in most cases, whereas spatially averaged values along the transect are on average lower than 0.02 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M413" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>b).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://esurf.copernicus.org/articles/8/221/2020/esurf-8-221-2020-f12.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?pagebreak page237?><p id="d1e7027">Our dataset allows for carrying out such a comparison of CRN denudation rates determined at hillslope sites with high-resolution hillslope topographic
properties. In particular, we test the consistency of our dataset with prediction of simple hillslope diffusion formulations such as
Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E3"/>) relating hilltop curvature <inline-formula><mml:math id="M414" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mtext>HT</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with denudation rate. We observe that no single diffusion coefficient can explain
the distribution of our data, but that, at most sites, the values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M415" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mtext>HT</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and erosion rates are compatible with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M416" display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in the 0.003 to
0.006 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M417" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> range (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F12"/>). The very high denudation rate observed for sample P, and resultant high diffusion coefficient, can
be a consequence of a recent anthropogenic disturbance, with the presence of small walls made from collected cobbles and possible shallow excavation
in the vicinity of the sampling site. This data point is not further considered in the following analysis. The range of observed diffusion
coefficients is consistent with values reported by available compilations for similar lithologies and climate (mean annual precipitation of
700 mm) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx58 bib1.bibx95" id="paren.133"/>. There is no climatic gradient over the limited extent of our study area, so this cannot
be invoked as a possible control for the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M418" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2-fold variations for the estimates of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M419" display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in our dataset, which in any case do not present a clear
spatial pattern or clustering. Similarly, bedrock geology is homogeneous between the different sites, with conglomerates of Miocene and Pliocene ages
releasing clasts of an homogeneous 5–10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M420" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> size group. We amalgamated up to 40 clasts at each sampling site and carefully selected
well-defined near-horizontal ridges with negligible topographic shielding, such that we do not consider that this spread in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M421" display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> can arise from
a systematic sampling bias.  We note that the amplitude of variability for our estimates of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M422" display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> at individual hilltops is similar to the uncertainty
range for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M423" display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> from studies based on CWDRs <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx58" id="paren.134"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. We consider the distribution of the observed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M424" display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values to be mostly
controlled by the natural variability of the hillslope processes and persistent internal transience at the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M425" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 100 m wavelength.  Such
variability, observed here at individual hilltop locations, is usually averaged out in studies relying on CWDR rather than local estimations based on
bedrock CRN inventories.</p>
      <p id="d1e7150">We use the estimated distribution for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M426" display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> to convert the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M427" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mtext>HT</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pattern along the transect into denudation rates using
Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E3"/>). We repeatedly sample the cumulative distribution for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M428" display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and use <inline-formula><mml:math id="M429" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mtext>HT</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> aggregated for hillslope patches. The
resulting values for denudation rates are binned at 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M430" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> intervals along the transect (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F12"/>). The interquartile ranges of
the bins are largely overlapping, but a systematic increase can still be observed, consistent with the underlying variation in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M431" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mtext>HT</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The
estimated median denudation values are <inline-formula><mml:math id="M432" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M433" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M434" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kyr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the southern and northern parts, respectively, which is
comparable to denudation rates reported in surrounding landscapes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx105 bib1.bibx109 bib1.bibx110" id="paren.135"/>. We note that the
denudation rate values measured at the various sites (blue circles in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F12"/>c) display an overall similar increasing trend but
with systematically higher values. This deviation results from a sampling bias toward high-curvature ridges due to better field conditions at such
sites. Indeed, measured <inline-formula><mml:math id="M435" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mtext>HT</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at these sites are <inline-formula><mml:math id="M436" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.02</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M437" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F12"/>a), whereas continuously averaged
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M438" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mtext>HT</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> along the transect are on average below <inline-formula><mml:math id="M439" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.02</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M440" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>b). Transport-limited conditions were prevailing at
all surveyed sites such that we have no reason to question the validity of Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E3"/>).  For that reason the predominance of
high-curvature/high-denudation sites in the dataset should not introduce a systematic deviation in the calibration of the diffusion coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M441" display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <?pagebreak page238?><p id="d1e7331">Under an assumption of steady-state conditions, we can propose that the observed 21 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M442" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 17 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M443" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kyr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> differential denudation rate between the southern
(distance <inline-formula><mml:math id="M444" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 km in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F12"/>c) and northern (distance <inline-formula><mml:math id="M445" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km) parts of the transect reflects a similar differential rock
uplift rate across the transect. Considering a dip angle of 64 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M446" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 11<inline-formula><mml:math id="M447" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/>e) for the hypothetical fault responsible for
the uplift pattern, it converts into a slip rate of 23 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M448" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M449" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kyr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which implies that slip rate is most
likely <inline-formula><mml:math id="M450" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M451" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kyr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on this blind thrust. This slow slip rate estimation is consistent with observations on slowly slipping faults of
western Provence, where deformation usually cannot be resolved from geodetic data, and proposed long-term slip rates
are <inline-formula><mml:math id="M452" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M453" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kyr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. For example, on the Trévaresse ridge fault, which produced the last major earthquake in metropolitan France (1909)
with an estimated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M454" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4" id="paren.136"/>, trenches have yielded a late Quaternary slip rate in the 50 to 300 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M455" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kyr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
range <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15" id="paren.137"/>, whereas accumulated deformation since the late Miocene indicates a slip rate of 30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M456" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M457" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kyr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="paren.138"/>. For the Middle Durance Fault, which is located directly west of our study area, across the Durance river, a slip rate
ranging from 10 to 70 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M458" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kyr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> has been proposed over the last Ma <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx105" id="paren.139"/>. At last, the uplift rate we calculated is of the
same order of magnitude as the one reported for the Lambrussier anticline by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52" id="text.140"/>, directly north of our study area. In
these slow-tectonics landscapes, erosion processes often outpace uplift rates, eroding passive deformation markers. While some aspects of the
investigated area, such as the lithology, size and orientation of our basins, present favorable characteristics, our study illustrates the potential
of tracking active erosion processes through hillslope morphology analysis to retrieve tectonic information in this type of environment.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>6</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e7568">Our analysis of hillslope properties along a transect into the Digne-Valensole basin, at the southern Alpine front, allows us to identify an important
systematic variation across a short horizontal distance (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M459" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M460" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). In the absence of any climatic, lithologic or vegetation gradient, the
observed increase in hilltop curvature, hillslope relief and normalized erosion rate points to a coincident increase in rock uplift. Hillslope lengths
appear to be constant along the studied transect and thus unaffected by this major change in the tectonic boundary condition. Usual metrics associated
with channel profile geometry, such as normalized steepness index, only capture the first-order change along the profile. Our results illustrate the
utility of high-resolution analysis of hillslope morphology in low-uplift areas.  Such techniques have the advantage to provide a dense spatial
coverage, whereas approaches based on the fluvial metrics are inherently limited by the geometry and distribution of the river network.</p>
      <p id="d1e7586">We also demonstrate that, using simple deformation models, the relative uplift pattern resolved from high-resolution hillslope morphology analysis can
be used to constrain the geometry and activity of underlying tectonic structures. We merged the morphological information obtained for hillslope
morphology with an estimation of denudation rates from cosmogenic nuclide concentration measurements to evaluate the diffusion coefficient for
hillslope sediment transport. In addition to the investigation of relative rock uplift patterns that are allowed by the approaches described above, the
combined use of cosmogenic-nuclide-derived denudation rates at selected hilltop sites can be used to evaluate the amount of differential rock uplift
across the transect. Such direct comparison of the spatial (high-resolution morphological analysis) and temporal (cosmogenic nuclides) aspects of
landscape evolution has only been explicitly addressed by a limited number of studies and holds tremendous potential to decipher the response of various
landscape elements to tectonic and climatic forcings.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e7593">The DEM used in this study is part of the RGE ALTI<sup>®</sup> database from
IGN (Institut National de l’information Géographique et Forestière; <uri>http://www.ign.fr/institut/activites/referentiel-a-grande-echelle</uri>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx60" id="altparen.141"/>).
This dataset is available under license from IGN.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="teamlist"><title>Team list</title>

      <p id="d1e7608">Georges Aumaître (Aix-Marseille Univ., CNRS, IRD, INRAE, Coll France, CEREGE, Aix-en-Provence, France), Didier L. Bourlès (Aix-Marseille Univ., CNRS, IRD, INRAE, Coll France, CEREGE, Aix-en-Provence, France), and Karim Keddadouche (Aix-Marseille Univ., CNRS, IRD, INRAE, Coll France, CEREGE, Aix-en-Provence, France).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e7614">VG carried out the topographic analysis, processed the CRN samples and developed codes used in the interpretation. VG and JCH
conducted field work. ASTER Team performed the AMS measurements. JCH, EC, NE, JF, OB and VO contributed to the understanding of the tectonics and
geomorphology of the study area. VG prepared the article with contributions from all
co-authors.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e7620">The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e7626">The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M461" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Be</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M462" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">26</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements were performed at the ASTER AMS national facility (CEREGE, Aix en
Provence), which is supported by the INSU/CNRS, the ANR through the “Projets thématiques d'excellence” program for the “Equipements d'excellence”
ASTER-CEREGE action and IRD. We thank Franck Thomas for assistance in the field. Some of the computing for this project was performed on the OSU Pythéas HPC cluster. Insightful reviews by
Martin D. Hurst, Marta Della Seta, Peter van der Beek and associate editor Veerle Vanacker allowed us to greatly improve our article.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e7655">This research has been supported by the ECCOREV Federation (Transval). This work is also a contribution to the Labex OT-Med (ANR-11-LABX-0061) funded by the
French Government “Investissements d'Avenir” program of the French National Research Agency (ANR) through the A<inline-formula><mml:math id="M463" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>MIDEX project
(ANR-11-IDEX-0001-02).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e7670">This paper was edited by Veerle Vanacker and reviewed by Martin D. Hurst, Peter van der Beek, and Marta Della Seta.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Arnold et~al.(2010)Arnold, Merchel, Bourl{\`{e}}s, Braucher, Benedetti, Finkel, Auma{\^{i}}tre, Gottdang, and Klein}}?><label>Arnold et al.(2010)Arnold, Merchel, Bourlès, Braucher, Benedetti, Finkel, Aumaître, Gottdang, and Klein</label><?label arnold2010french?><mixed-citation>Arnold, M., Merchel, S., Bourlès, D. L., Braucher, R., Benedetti, L., Finkel, R. C., Aumaître, G., Gottdang, A., and Klein, M.:
The French accelerator mass spectrometry facility ASTER: Improved performance and developments,
Nucl. Instrum. Meth. B,
268, 1954–1959, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2010.02.107" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.nimb.2010.02.107</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><label>Balco(2017)</label><?label balco2017production?><mixed-citation>Balco, G.:
Production rate calculations for cosmic-ray-muon-produced <inline-formula><mml:math id="M464" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Be</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M465" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">26</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> benchmarked against geological calibration data,
Quat. Geochronol.,
39, 150–173, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quageo.2017.02.001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.quageo.2017.02.001</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><label>Balco et al.(2008)Balco, Stone, Lifton, and Dunai</label><?label balco2008complete?><mixed-citation>Balco, G., Stone, J. O., Lifton, N. A., and Dunai, T. J.:
A complete and easily accessible means of calculating surface exposure ages or erosion rates from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M466" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Be</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M467" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">26</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements,
Quat. Geochronol.,
3, 174–195, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quageo.2007.12.001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.quageo.2007.12.001</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><label>Baroux et al.(2003)Baroux, Pino, Valensise, Scotti, and Cushing</label><?label baroux2003source?><mixed-citation>Baroux, E., Pino, N. A., Valensise, G., Scotti, O., and Cushing, M. E.:
Source parameters of the 11 June 1909, Lambesc (Provence, southeastern France) earthquake: A reappraisal based on macroseismic, seismological, and geodetic observations,
J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea.,
108, 2454, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JB002348" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002JB002348</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><label>Beck et al.(1998)Beck, Deville, Blanc, Philippe, and Tardy</label><?label beck1998horizontal?><mixed-citation>Beck, C., Deville, E., Blanc, E., Philippe, Y., and Tardy, M.:
Horizontal shortening control of Middle Miocene marine siliciclastic accumulation (Upper Marine Molasse) in the southern termination of the Savoy Molasse Basin (northwestern Alps/southern Jura),
Geol. Soc. Spec. Publ.,
134, 263–278, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.1998.134.01.12" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1144/GSL.SP.1998.134.01.12</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><label>Benedetti et al.(2000)Benedetti, Tapponnier, King, Meyer, and Manighetti</label><?label benedetti2000growth?><mixed-citation>Benedetti, L., Tapponnier, P., King, G. C. P., Meyer, B., and Manighetti, I.:
Growth folding and active thrusting in the Montello region, Veneto, northern Italy,
J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea.,
105, 739–766, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JB900222" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/1999JB900222</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><label>Borchers et al.(2016)Borchers, Marrero, Balco, Caffee, Goehring, Lifton, Nishiizumi, Phillips, Schaefer, and Stone</label><?label borchers2016geological?><mixed-citation>Borchers, B., Marrero, S., Balco, G., Caffee, M., Goehring, B., Lifton, N., Nishiizumi, K., Phillips, F., Schaefer, J., and Stone, J.:
Geological calibration of spallation production rates in the CRONUS-Earth project,
Quat. Geochronol.,
31, 188–198, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quageo.2015.01.009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.quageo.2015.01.009</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><label>Boulton et al.(2014)Boulton, Stokes, and Mather</label><?label boulton2014transient?><mixed-citation>Boulton, S., Stokes, M., and Mather, A.:
Transient fluvial incision as an indicator of active faulting and Plio-Quaternary uplift of the Moroccan High Atlas,
Tectonophysics,
633, 16–33, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2014.06.032" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.tecto.2014.06.032</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><label>Brown et al.(1991)Brown, Edmond, Raisbeck, Yiou, Kurz, and Brook</label><?label brown1991examination?><mixed-citation>Brown, E. T., Edmond, J. M., Raisbeck, G. M., Yiou, F., Kurz, M. D., and Brook, E. J.:
Examination of surface exposure ages of Antarctic moraines using in situ produced <inline-formula><mml:math id="M468" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Be</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M469" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">26</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac.,
55, 2269–2283, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(91)90103-C" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0016-7037(91)90103-C</ext-link>, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><label>Burbank et al.(1996)Burbank, Leland, Fielding, Anderson, Brozovic, Reid, and Duncan</label><?label burbank1996bedrock?><mixed-citation>Burbank, D. W., Leland, J., Fielding, E., Anderson, R. S., Brozovic, N., Reid, M. R., and Duncan, C.:
Bedrock incision, rock uplift and threshold hillslopes in the northwestern Himalayas,
Nature,
379, 505–510, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/379505a0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/379505a0</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><label>Champagnac et al.(2007)Champagnac, Molnar, Anderson, Sue, and Delacou</label><?label champagnac2007quaternary?><mixed-citation>Champagnac, J., Molnar, P., Anderson, R., Sue, C., and Delacou, B.:
Quaternary erosion-induced isostatic rebound in the western Alps,
Geology,
35, 195, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1130/G23053A.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1130/G23053A.1</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><label>Champagnac et al.(2008)Champagnac, van der Beek, Diraison, and Dauphin</label><?label champagnac2008flexural?><mixed-citation>Champagnac, J.-D., van der Beek, P., Diraison, G., and Dauphin, S.:
Flexural isostatic response of the Alps to increased Quaternary erosion recorded by foreland basin remnants, SE France,
Terra Nova,
20, 213–220, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3121.2008.00809.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-3121.2008.00809.x</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><label>Champagnac et al.(2012)Champagnac, Molnar, Sue, and Herman</label><?label champagnac2012tectonics?><mixed-citation>Champagnac, J.-D., Molnar, P., Sue, C., and Herman, F.:
Tectonics, climate, and mountain topography,
J. Geophys. Res.,
117, B02403, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JB008348" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011JB008348</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><label>Chardon and Bellier(2003)</label><?label chardon2003geological?><mixed-citation>Chardon, D. and Bellier, O.:
Geological boundary conditions of the 1909 Lambesc (Provence, France) earthquake: structure and evolution of the Trévaresse ridge anticline,
B. Soc. Geol. Fr.,
174, 497–510, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2113/174.5.497" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2113/174.5.497</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><label>Chardon et al.(2005)Chardon, Hermitte, Nguyen, and Bellier</label><?label chardon2005first?><mixed-citation>Chardon, D., Hermitte, D., Nguyen, F., and Bellier, O.:
First <?xmltex \hack{\mbox\bgroup}?>paleoseismological<?xmltex \hack{\egroup}?> constraints on the strongest earthquake in France (Provence) in the twentieth century,
Geology,
33, 901–904, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1130/G21713.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1130/G21713.1</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><label>Clauzon(1982)</label><?label clauzon1982messinian?><mixed-citation>Clauzon, G.:
The Messinian Rhone canyon as a definite proof of the “desiccated deep-basin model”,
B. Soc. Geol. Fr.,
S7-XXIV, 597–610, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2113/gssgfbull.S7-XXIV.3.597" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2113/gssgfbull.S7-XXIV.3.597</ext-link>, 1982.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><label>Clauzon(1996)</label><?label clauzon1996limites?><mixed-citation>
Clauzon, G.:
Sequence boundaries and geodynamic evolution,
Geomorphologie,
2, 3–21, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><label>Clauzon et al.(1989)Clauzon, Aguilar, and Michaux</label><?label clauzon1989investigation?><mixed-citation>Clauzon, G., Aguilar, J. P., and Michaux, J.:
Investigation of the time-sedimentation relation thanks to examples taken from the French Mediterranean Neogene,
B. Soc. Geol. Fr.,
V, 361–372, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2113/gssgfbull.v.2.361" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2113/gssgfbull.v.2.361</ext-link>, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><label>Clauzon et al.(2011)Clauzon, Fleury, Bellier, Molliex, Mocochain, and Aguilar</label><?label clauzon2011morphostructural?><mixed-citation>Clauzon, G., Fleury, T. J., Bellier, O., Molliex, S., Mocochain, L., and Aguilar, J. P.:
Morphostructural evolution of the Luberon since the Miocene (SE France),
B. Soc. Geol. Fr.,
182, 95–110, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2113/gssgfbull.182.2.95" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2113/gssgfbull.182.2.95</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><label>Clubb et al.(2014)Clubb, Mudd, Milodowski, Hurst, and Slater</label><?label clubb2014objective?><mixed-citation>Clubb, F. J., Mudd, S. M., Milodowski, D. T., Hurst, M. D., and Slater, L. J.:
Objective extraction of channel heads from high-resolution topographic data,
Water Resour. Res.,
50, 4283–4304, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013WR015167" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2013WR015167</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><label>Clubb et al.(2016)Clubb, Mudd, Attal, Milodowski, and Grieve</label><?label clubb2016relationship?><mixed-citation>Clubb, F. J., Mudd, S. M., Attal, M., Milodowski, D. T., and Grieve, S. W.:
The relationship between drainage density, erosion rate, and hilltop curvature: Implications for sediment transport processes,
J. Geophys. Res.-Earth,
121, 1724–1745, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JF003747" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015JF003747</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><label>Clubb et al.(2017)Clubb, Mudd, Milodowski, Valters, Slater, Hurst, and Limaye</label><?label clubb2017geomorphometric?><mixed-citation>Clubb, F. J., Mudd, S. M., Milodowski, D. T., Valters, D. A., Slater, L. J., Hurst, M. D., and Limaye, A. B.: Geomorphometric delineation of floodplains and terraces from objectively defined topographic thresholds, Earth Surf. Dynam., 5, 369–385, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-5-369-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/esurf-5-369-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><label>Clubb et al.(2020)Clubb, Mudd, Hurst, and Grieve</label><?label clubb2020differences?><mixed-citation>Clubb, F. J., Mudd, S. M., Hurst, M. D., and Grieve, S. W.:
Differences in channel and hillslope geometry record a migrating uplift wave at the Mendocino triple junction, California, USA,
Geology,
48, 184–188, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1130/G46939.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1130/G46939.1</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><label>Collina-Girard and Griboulard(1990)</label><?label collina1990structuration?><mixed-citation>Collina-Girard, J. and Griboulard, R.:
The deep-structure of the Valensole Plateau (French Alps). Contribution of network valley and topographic analysis,
Géologie méditerranéenne,
17, 153–171, <uri>https://www.persee.fr/doc/geolm_0397-2844_1990_num_17_2_1439</uri> (last access: 4 January 2017), 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Cushing et~al.(2008)Cushing, Bellier, Nechtschein, S{\'{e}}brier, Lomax, Volant, Dervin, Guignard, and Bove}}?><label>Cushing et al.(2008)Cushing, Bellier, Nechtschein, Sébrier, Lomax, Volant, Dervin, Guignard, and Bove</label><?label cushing2008multidisciplinary?><mixed-citation>Cushing, E. M., Bellier, O., Nechtschein, S., Sébrier, M., Lomax, A., Volant, P., Dervin, P., Guignard, P., and Bove, L.:
A multidisciplinary study of a slow-slipping fault for seismic hazard assessment: the example of the Middle Durance Fault (SE France),
Geophys. J. Int.,
172, 1163–1178, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2007.03683.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-246X.2007.03683.x</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><label>Cyr et al.(2010)Cyr, Granger, Olivetti, and Molin</label><?label cyr2010quantifying?><mixed-citation>Cyr, A. J., Granger, D. E., Olivetti, V., and Molin, P.:
Quantifying rock uplift rates using channel steepness and cosmogenic nuclide-determined erosion rates: Examples from northern and southern Italy,
Lithosphere,
2, 188–198, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1130/L96.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1130/L96.1</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page240?><ref id="bib1.bibx27"><label>Delacou et al.(2005)Delacou, Sue, Champagnac, and Burkhard</label><?label delacou2005origin?><mixed-citation>Delacou, B., Sue, C., Champagnac, J.-D., and Burkhard, M.:
Origin of the current stress field in the western/central Alps: role of gravitational re-equilibration constrained by numerical modelling,
Geol. Soc. Spec. Publ.,
243, 295–310, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.2005.243.01.19" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1144/GSL.SP.2005.243.01.19</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><label>Demoulin(2012)</label><?label demoulin2012morphometric?><mixed-citation>Demoulin, A.:
Morphometric dating of the fluvial landscape response to a tectonic perturbation,
Geophys. Res. Lett.,
39, 1–5, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL052201" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012GL052201</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><label>DiBiase and Whipple(2011)</label><?label dibiase2011influence?><mixed-citation>DiBiase, R. A. and Whipple, K. X.:
The influence of erosion thresholds and runoff variability on the relationships among topography, climate, and erosion rate,
J. Geophys. Res.,
116, F04036, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JF002095" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011JF002095</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx30"><label>DiBiase et al.(2012)DiBiase, Heimsath, and Whipple</label><?label dibiase2012hillslope?><mixed-citation>DiBiase, R. A., Heimsath, A. M., and Whipple, K. X.:
Hillslope response to tectonic forcing in threshold landscapes,
Earth Surf. Proc. Land.,
37, 855–865, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3205" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/esp.3205</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx31"><label>Dietrich et al.(2003)Dietrich, Bellugi, Sklar, Stock, Heimsath, and Roering</label><?label dietrich2003geomorphic?><mixed-citation>Dietrich, W. E., Bellugi, D. G., Sklar, L. S., Stock, J. D., Heimsath, A. M., and Roering, J. J.:
Geomorphic transport laws for predicting landscape form and dynamics,
in: Prediction in Geomorphology,
edited by:
Wilcock, P. R. and Iverson, R. M.,
vol. 135 of Geophysical Monograph Series, pp. 103–132,
American Geophysical Union, Washington, D.C., USA, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/GM135" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/GM135</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx32"><label>Dubar(1984a)</label><?label dubar1984chronology?><mixed-citation>Dubar, M.:
Chronology and significance of the late Neogene deposits of Riez-Valensole basin (Alpes-de-Haute-Provence, France),
B. Soc. Geol. Fr.,
S7-XXVI, 971–978, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2113/gssgfbull.S7-XXVI.5.971" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2113/gssgfbull.S7-XXVI.5.971</ext-link>, 1984a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx33"><label>Dubar(1984b)</label><?label dubar1984terrasses?><mixed-citation>Dubar, M.:
Fluviatile terraces in South of the Alps,
Bulletin de l'Association française pour l'étude du quaternaire,
21, 134–138, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3406/quate.1984.1501" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3406/quate.1984.1501</ext-link>, 1984b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx34"><label>Dubar(2014)</label><?label dubar2014correlation?><mixed-citation>
Dubar, M.:
Correlation of the villafranchian mammalian sites of Puimoisson (valensole basin, Alpes de Haute-Provence, France) and others dated sites (palaeomagnetism, radionuclides) of Southern Europe (France, Italy and Spain),
Quaternaire,
25, 85–90, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx35"><label>Dubar and Semah(1986)</label><?label dubar1986paleomagnetic?><mixed-citation>Dubar, M. and Semah, F.:
Paleomagnetic Data Bearing on the Age of High Terrace Deposits (Durance Sequence) in Alpine Valleys of Southeastern France,
Quaternary Res.,
25, 387–391, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0033-5894(86)90009-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0033-5894(86)90009-8</ext-link>, 1986.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx36"><label>Dubar et al.(1978)Dubar, Guerin, and Heintz</label><?label dubar1978nouveaux?><mixed-citation>Dubar, M., Guerin, C., and Heintz, E.:
Les nouveaux gisements villafranchiens du ravin de Cornillet (Moustiers Sainte-Marie, Alpes de Haute Provence, France) et leur contexte géologique,
Geobios,
11, 367–381, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-6995(78)80036-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0016-6995(78)80036-9</ext-link>, 1978.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx37"><label>Dubar et al.(1998)Dubar, Aguilar, Chaline, Michaux, and Semah</label><?label dubar1998chronological?><mixed-citation>
Dubar, M., Aguilar, J. P., Chaline, J., Michaux, J., and Semah, F.:
Chronological data (mammalian faunas, paleomagnetism) on the Plio-Pleistocene deposits from the top of the Valensole Basin: morphodynamic implications,
Géologie de la France,
1, 57–68, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx38"><label>Dubois and Curnelle(1978)</label><?label dubois1978resultas?><mixed-citation>
Dubois, P. and Curnelle, R.:
Résultats apportés par le forage les Mées no. 1 sur le plateau de Valensole (Alpes de Haute-Provence),
Comptes-Rendus Sommaires des séance de la Société Géologique de France,
4, 181–184, 1978.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx39"><label>Duvall et al.(2004)Duvall, Kirby, and Burbank</label><?label duvall2004tectonic?><mixed-citation>Duvall, A., Kirby, E., and Burbank, D. W.:
Tectonic and lithologic controls on bedrock channel profiles and processes in coastal California,
J. Geophys. Res.,
109, F03002, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JF000086" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003JF000086</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx40"><label>Fox et al.(2014)Fox, Goren, May, and Willett</label><?label fox2014inversion?><mixed-citation>Fox, M., Goren, L., May, D. A., and Willett, S. D.:
Inversion of fluvial channels for paleorock uplift rates in Taiwan,
J. Geophys. Res.-Earth,
119, 1853–1875, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JF003196" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014JF003196</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx41"><label>Gabert(1979)</label><?label gabert1979terrasses?><mixed-citation>Gabert, J.:
Les terrasses de la Moyenne Durance,
Bulletin de l'Association française pour l'étude du quaternaire,
16, 101–108, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3406/quate.1979.1352" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3406/quate.1979.1352</ext-link>, 1979.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx42"><label>Gallen et al.(2013)Gallen, Wegmann, and Bohnenstiehl</label><?label gallen2013miocene?><mixed-citation>Gallen, S. F., Wegmann, K. W., and Bohnenstiehl, D. W. R.:
Miocene rejuvenation of topographic relief in the southern Appalachians,
GSA Today,
23, 4–10, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1130/GSATG163A.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1130/GSATG163A.1</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx43"><label>Gelman and Rubin(1992)</label><?label gelman1992inference?><mixed-citation>Gelman, A. and Rubin, D. B.:
Inference from Iterative Simulation Using Multiple Sequences,
Stat. Sci.,
7, 457–472, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1214/ss/1177011136" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1214/ss/1177011136</ext-link>, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx44"><label>Gidon and Pairis(1988)</label><?label gidon1988example?><mixed-citation>
Gidon, M. and Pairis, J.-L.:
An example of the influence of coevel sedimentation on structures developed at the front of a thrust sheet moving in free-air: the structure of the region around Digne (SE France),
Comptes rendus de l'Académie des Sciences,
307, 1283–1288, 1988.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx45"><label>Glennie et al.(2013)Glennie, Carter, Shrestha, and Dietrich</label><?label glennie2013geodetic?><mixed-citation>Glennie, C. L., Carter, W. E., Shrestha, R. L., and Dietrich, W. E.:
Geodetic imaging with airborne LiDAR: the Earth's surface revealed,
Rep. Prog. Phys.,
76, 086801, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/76/8/086801" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/0034-4885/76/8/086801</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx46"><label>Godard et al.(2016)Godard, Ollivier, Bellier, Miramont, Shabanian, Fleury, Benedetti, and Guillou</label><?label godard2016weathering?><mixed-citation>Godard, V., Ollivier, V., Bellier, O., Miramont, C., Shabanian, E., Fleury, J., Benedetti, L., and Guillou, V.:
Weathering-limited hillslope evolution in carbonate landscapes,
Earth Planet. Sc. Lett.,
446, 10–20, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2016.04.017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.epsl.2016.04.017</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx47"><label>Godard et al.(2019)Godard, Dosseto, Fleury, Bellier, Siame, and ASTER</label><?label godard2019transient?><mixed-citation>Godard, V., Dosseto, A., Fleury, J., Bellier, O., Siame, L., and ASTER Team:
Transient landscape dynamics across the Southeastern Australian Escarpment,
Earth Planet. Sc. Lett.,
506, 397–406, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2018.11.017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.epsl.2018.11.017</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx48"><label>Grieve et al.(2016a)Grieve, Mudd, and Hurst</label><?label grieve2014how?><mixed-citation>Grieve, S. W., Mudd, S. M., and Hurst, M. D.:
How long is a hillslope?,
Earth Surf. Proc. Land.,
41, 1039–1054, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3884" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/esp.3884</ext-link>, 2016a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx49"><label>Grieve et al.(2016b)Grieve, Mudd, Hurst, and Milodowski</label><?label grieve2016nondimensional?><mixed-citation>Grieve, S. W. D., Mudd, S. M., Hurst, M. D., and Milodowski, D. T.: A nondimensional framework for exploring the relief structure of landscapes, Earth Surf. Dynam., 4, 309–325, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-4-309-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/esurf-4-309-2016</ext-link>, 2016b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx50"><label>Grieve et al.(2016c)Grieve, Mudd, Milodowski, Clubb, and Furbish</label><?label grieve2016how?><mixed-citation>Grieve, S. W. D., Mudd, S. M., Milodowski, D. T., Clubb, F. J., and Furbish, D. J.: How does grid-resolution modulate the topographic expression of geomorphic processes?, Earth Surf. Dynam., 4, 627–653, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-4-627-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/esurf-4-627-2016</ext-link>, 2016c.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx51"><label>Harel et al.(2016)Harel, Mudd, and Attal</label><?label harel2016global?><mixed-citation>Harel, M.-a., Mudd, S., and Attal, M.:
Global analysis of the stream power law parameters based on worldwide 10Be denudation rates,
Geomorphology,
268, 184–196, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2016.05.035" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.geomorph.2016.05.035</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx52"><label>Hippolyte and Dumont(2000)</label><?label hippolyte2000identification?><mixed-citation>
Hippolyte, J.-C. and Dumont, T.:
Identification of Quaternary thrusts, folds and faults in a low seismicity area: examples in the Southern Alps (France),
Terra Nova,
12, 156–162, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx53"><label>Hippolyte et al.(2011)Hippolyte, Clauzon, and Suc</label><?label hippolyte2011messinian?><mixed-citation>Hippolyte, J.-C., Clauzon, G., and Suc, J.-P.:
Messinian-Zanclean canyons in the Digne nappe (southwestern Alps): tectonic implications,
B. Soc. Geol. Fr.,
182, 111–132, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2113/gssgfbull.182.2.111" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2113/gssgfbull.182.2.111</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx54"><label>Howard(1994)</label><?label howard1994detachment?><mixed-citation>Howard, A. D.:
A detachment-limited model of drainage basin evolution,
Water Resour. Res.,
30, 2261–2285, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/94WR00757" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/94WR00757</ext-link>, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx55"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Hs{\"{u}} et~al.(1977)Hs{\"{u}}, Montadert, Bernoulli, Cita, Erickson, Garrison, Kidd, M{\`{e}}lier{\'{e}}s, M{\"{u}}ller, and Wright}}?><label>Hsü et al.(1977)Hsü, Montadert, Bernoulli, Cita, Erickson, Garrison, Kidd, Mèlierés, Müller, and Wright</label><?label hsu1977history?><mixed-citation>Hsü, K. J., Montadert, L., Bernoulli, D., Cita, M. B., Erickson, A., Garrison, R. E., Kidd, R. B., Mèlierés, F., Müller, C., and Wright, R.:
History of the Mediterranean salinity crisis,
Nature,
267, 399–403, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/267399a0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/267399a0</ext-link>, 1977.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page241?><ref id="bib1.bibx56"><label>Hurst et al.(2012)Hurst, Mudd, Walcott, Attal, and Yoo</label><?label hurst2012using?><mixed-citation>Hurst, M. D., Mudd, S. M., Walcott, R., Attal, M., and Yoo, K.:
Using hilltop curvature to derive the spatial distribution of erosion rates,
J. Geophys. Res.,
117, F02017, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JF002057" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011JF002057</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx57"><label>Hurst et al.(2013a)Hurst, Mudd, Attal, and Hilley</label><?label hurst2013hillslopes?><mixed-citation>Hurst, M. D., Mudd, S. M., Attal, M., and Hilley, G.:
Hillslopes record the growth and decay of landscapes,
Science,
341, 868–871, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1241791" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1241791</ext-link>, 2013a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx58"><label>Hurst et al.(2013b)Hurst, Mudd, Yoo, Attal, and Walcott</label><?label hurst2013influence?><mixed-citation>Hurst, M. D., Mudd, S. M., Yoo, K., Attal, M., and Walcott, R.:
Influence of lithology on hillslope morphology and response to tectonic forcing in the northern Sierra Nevada of California,
J. Geophys. Res.-Earth,
118, 832–851, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrf.20049" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/jgrf.20049</ext-link>, 2013b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx59"><label>Hurst et al.(2019)Hurst, Grieve, Clubb, and Mudd</label><?label hurst2019detection?><mixed-citation>Hurst, M. D., Grieve, S. W., Clubb, F. J., and Mudd, S. M.:
Detection of channel-hillslope coupling along a tectonic gradient,
Earth Planet. Sc. Lett.,
522, 30–39, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2019.06.018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.epsl.2019.06.018</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx60"><label>IGN(2017)</label><?label IGN2017?><mixed-citation>IGN: Composante altimetrique du RGE<sup>®</sup>, available at: <uri>http://www.ign.fr/institut/activites/referentiel-a-grande-echelle</uri>, last access: 1 September 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx61"><label>James and Robson(2012)</label><?label james2012straightforward?><mixed-citation>James, M. R. and Robson, S.:
Straightforward reconstruction of 3D surfaces and topography with a camera: Accuracy and geoscience application,
J. Geophys. Res.,
117, F03017, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JF002289" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011JF002289</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx62"><label>Jouanne et al.(2001)Jouanne, Hippolyte, Gamond, and Martinod</label><?label jouanne2001current?><mixed-citation>Jouanne, F., Hippolyte, J. C., Gamond, J. F., and Martinod, J.:
Current deformation of the Digne Nappe (southwestern Alps) from a comparison between triangulation and GPS data,
Geophys. J. Int.,
144, 432–440, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-246x.2001.00338.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1046/j.1365-246x.2001.00338.x</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx63"><label>Kirby and Whipple(2012)</label><?label kirby2012expression?><mixed-citation>Kirby, E. and Whipple, K. X.:
Expression of active tectonics in erosional landscapes,
J. Struct. Geol.,
44, 54–75, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2012.07.009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jsg.2012.07.009</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx64"><label>Kirby et al.(2003)Kirby, Whipple, Tang, and Chen</label><?label kirby2003distribution?><mixed-citation>Kirby, E., Whipple, K. X., Tang, W., and Chen, Z.:
Distribution of active rock uplift along the eastern margin of the Tibetan Plateau: Inferences from bedrock channel longitudinal profiles,
J. Geophys. Res.,
108, 2217, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JB000861" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001JB000861</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx65"><label>Lague(2014)</label><?label lague2014stream?><mixed-citation>Lague, D.:
The stream power river incision model: Evidence, theory and beyond,
Earth Surf. Proc. Land.,
39, 38–61, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3462" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/esp.3462</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx66"><label>Lague and Davy(2003)</label><?label lague2003constraints?><mixed-citation>Lague, D. and Davy, P.:
Constraints on the long-term colluvial erosion law by analyzing slope-area relationships at various tectonic uplift rates in the Siwaliks Hills (Nepal),
J. Geophys. Res.,
108, 2129, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JB001893" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002JB001893</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx67"><label>Lashermes et al.(2007)Lashermes, Foufoula-Georgiou, and Dietrich</label><?label lashermes2007channel?><mixed-citation>Lashermes, B., Foufoula-Georgiou, E., and Dietrich, W. E.:
Channel network extraction from high resolution topography using wavelets,
Geophys. Res. Lett.,
34, L23S04, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL031140" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007GL031140</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx68"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{{Le Roux-Mallouf} et~al.(2015){Le Roux-Mallouf}, Godard, Cattin, Ferry, Gyeltshen, Ritz, Drupka, Guillou, Arnold, Auma{\^{i}}tre, Bourl{\`{e}}s, and Keddadouche}}?><label>Le Roux-Mallouf et al.(2015)Le Roux-Mallouf, Godard, Cattin, Ferry, Gyeltshen, Ritz, Drupka, Guillou, Arnold, Aumaître, Bourlès, and Keddadouche</label><?label lerouxmallouf2015evidence?><mixed-citation>Le Roux-Mallouf, R., Godard, V., Cattin, R., Ferry, M., Gyeltshen, J., Ritz, J.-F., Drupka, D., Guillou, V., Arnold, M., Aumaître, G., Bourlès, D. L., and Keddadouche, K.:
Evidence for a wide and gently dipping Main Himalayan Thrust in western Bhutan,
Geophys. Res. Lett.,
42, 3257–3265, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL063767" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015GL063767</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx69"><label>Lickorish and Ford(1998)</label><?label lickorish1998sequential?><mixed-citation>Lickorish, W. H. and Ford, M.:
Sequential restoration of the external Alpine Digne thrust system, SE France, constrained by kinematic data and synorogenic sediments,
Geol. Soc. Spec. Publ.,
134, 189–211, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.1998.134.01.09" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1144/GSL.SP.1998.134.01.09</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx70"><label>Lifton et al.(2014)Lifton, Sato, and Dunai</label><?label lifton2014scaling?><mixed-citation>Lifton, N., Sato, T., and Dunai, T. J.:
Scaling in situ cosmogenic nuclide production rates using analytical approximations to atmospheric cosmic-ray fluxes,
Earth Planet. Sc. Lett.,
386, 149–160, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2013.10.052" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.epsl.2013.10.052</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx71"><label>Merchel and Bremser(2004)</label><?label merchel2004first?><mixed-citation>Merchel, S. and Bremser, W.:
First international 26Al interlaboratory comparison – Part I,
Nucl. Instrum. Meth. B,
223-224, 393–400, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2004.04.076" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.nimb.2004.04.076</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx72"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Merchel et~al.(2008)Merchel, Arnold, Auma{\^{i}}tre, Benedetti, Bourl{\`{e}}s, Braucher, Alfimov, Freeman, Steier, and Wallner}}?><label>Merchel et al.(2008)Merchel, Arnold, Aumaître, Benedetti, Bourlès, Braucher, Alfimov, Freeman, Steier, and Wallner</label><?label merchel2008towards?><mixed-citation>Merchel, S., Arnold, M., Aumaître, G., Benedetti, L., Bourlès, D., Braucher, R., Alfimov, V., Freeman, S., Steier, P., and Wallner, A.:
Towards more precise <inline-formula><mml:math id="M470" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Be</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M471" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">36</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> data from measurements at the 10–14 level: Influence of sample preparation,
Nucl. Instrum. Meth. B,
266, 4921–4926, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2008.07.031" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.nimb.2008.07.031</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx73"><label>Mercier(1979)</label><?label mercier1979neogene?><mixed-citation>
Mercier, H.:
Le Néogène et le Pléistocène inférieur duranciens,
Géologie Alpine,
55, 111–132, 1979.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx74"><label>Metropolis et al.(1953)Metropolis, Rosenbluth, Rosenbluth, Teller, and Teller</label><?label metropolis1953equation?><mixed-citation>Metropolis, N., Rosenbluth, A. W., Rosenbluth, M. N., Teller, A. H., and Teller, E.:
Equation of State Calculations by Fast Computing Machines,
J. Chem. Phys.,
21, 1087–1092, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1699114" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1063/1.1699114</ext-link>, 1953.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx75"><label>Milodowski et al.(2015)Milodowski, Mudd, and Mitchard</label><?label milodowski2015topographic?><mixed-citation>Milodowski, D. T., Mudd, S. M., and Mitchard, E. T. A.: Topographic roughness as a signature of the emergence of bedrock in eroding landscapes, Earth Surf. Dynam., 3, 483–499, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-3-483-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/esurf-3-483-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx76"><label>Mitasova et al.(1996)Mitasova, Hofierka, Zlocha, and Iverson</label><?label mitasova1996modelling?><mixed-citation>Mitasova, H., Hofierka, J., Zlocha, M., and Iverson, L. R.:
Modelling topographic potential for erosion and deposition using GIS,
Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Syst.,
10, 629–641, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02693799608902101" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02693799608902101</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx77"><label>Morell et al.(2015)Morell, Sandiford, Rajendran, Rajendran, and Sanwal</label><?label morell2015geomorphology?><mixed-citation>Morell, K. D., Sandiford, M., Rajendran, C. P., Rajendran, K., and Sanwal, J.:
Geomorphology reveals seismogenic structures in the central Himalayan seismic gap,
Lithosphere,
7, 247–256, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1130/L407.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1130/L407.1</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx78"><label>Mudd(2017)</label><?label mudd2016detection?><mixed-citation>Mudd, S. M.:
Detection of transience in eroding landscapes,
Earth Surf. Proc. Land.,
42, 24–41, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3923" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/esp.3923</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx79"><label>Myers et al.(2003)Myers, Nabelek, and Yeats</label><?label myers2003dislocation?><mixed-citation>Myers, D. J., Nabelek, J. L., and Yeats, R. S.:
Dislocation modeling of blind thrusts in the eastern Los Angeles basin, California,
J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea.,
108, 2443, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002jb002150" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002jb002150</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx80"><label>Neely et al.(2019)Neely, DiBiase, Corbett, Bierman, and Caffee</label><?label neely2019bedrock?><mixed-citation>Neely, A. B., DiBiase, R. A., Corbett, L. B., Bierman, P. R., and Caffee, M. W.:
Bedrock fracture density controls on hillslope erodibility in steep, rocky landscapes with patchy soil cover, southern California, USA,
Earth Planet. Sc. Lett.,
522, 186–197, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2019.06.011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.epsl.2019.06.011</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx81"><label>Neteler et al.(2012)Neteler, Bowman, Landa, and Metz</label><?label neteler2012grass?><mixed-citation>Neteler, M., Bowman, M. H., Landa, M., and Metz, M.:
GRASS GIS: A multi-purpose open source GIS,
Environ. Modell. Softw.,
31, 124–130, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.11.014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.11.014</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx82"><label>Nicolas et al.(1990)Nicolas, Santoire, and Delpech</label><?label nicolas1990intraplate?><mixed-citation>Nicolas, M., Santoire, J., and Delpech, P.:
Intraplate seismicity: new seismotectonic data in Western Europe,
Tectonophysics,
179, 27–53, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(90)90354-B" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0040-1951(90)90354-B</ext-link>, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx83"><label>Nishiizumi et al.(2007)Nishiizumi, Imamura, Caffee, Southon, Finkel, and McAninch</label><?label nishiizumi2007absolute?><mixed-citation>Nishiizumi, K., Imamura, M., Caffee, M. W., Southon, J. R., Finkel, R. C., and McAninch, J.:
Absolute calibration of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M472" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Be</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> AMS standards,
Nucl. Instrum. Meth. B,
258, 403–413, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2007.01.297" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.nimb.2007.01.297</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx84"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Nocquet et~al.(2016)Nocquet, Sue, Walpersdorf, Tran, Len{\^{o}}tre, Vernant, Cushing, Jouanne, Masson, Baize, Ch{\'{e}}ry, and van~der Beek}}?><label>Nocquet et al.(2016)Nocquet, Sue, Walpersdorf, Tran, Lenôtre, Vernant, Cushing, Jouanne, Masson, Baize, Chéry, and van der Beek</label><?label nocquet2016present?><mixed-citation>Nocquet, J.-M., Sue, C., Walpersdorf, A., Tran, T., Lenôtre, N., Vernant, P., Cushing, M., Jouanne, F., Masson, F., Baize, S., Chéry, J., and van der Beek, P. A.:
Present-day uplift of the western Alps,
Sci. Rep.-UK,
6, 28 404, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep28404" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/srep28404</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx85"><label>Okada(1985)</label><?label okada1985surface?><mixed-citation>
Okada, Y.:
Surface deformation due to shear and tensile faults in a half-space,
B. Seismol. Soc. Am.,
75, 1135–1154, 1985.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page242?><ref id="bib1.bibx86"><label>Ouimet et al.(2009)Ouimet, Whipple, and Granger</label><?label ouimet2009beyond?><mixed-citation>Ouimet, W. B., Whipple, K. X., and Granger, D. E.:
Beyond threshold hillslopes: Channel adjustment to base-level fall in tectonically active mountain ranges,
Geology,
37, 579–582, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1130/G30013A.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1130/G30013A.1</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx87"><label>Passalacqua et al.(2015)Passalacqua, Belmont, Staley, Simley, Arrowsmith, Bode, Crosby, DeLong, Glenn, Kelly, Lague, Sangireddy, Schaffrath, Tarboton, Wasklewicz, and Wheaton</label><?label passalacqua2015analyzing?><mixed-citation>Passalacqua, P., Belmont, P., Staley, D. M., Simley, J. D., Arrowsmith, J. R., Bode, C. a., Crosby, C., DeLong, S. B., Glenn, N. F., Kelly, S. a., Lague, D., Sangireddy, H., Schaffrath, K., Tarboton, D. G., Wasklewicz, T., and Wheaton, J. M.:
Analyzing high resolution topography for advancing the understanding of mass and energy transfer through landscapes: A review,
Earth-Sci. Rev.,
148, 174–193, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2015.05.012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.earscirev.2015.05.012</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx88"><label>Pelletier(2013)</label><?label pelletier2013robust?><mixed-citation>Pelletier, J. D.:
A robust, two-parameter method for the extraction of drainage networks from high-resolution digital elevation models (DEMs): Evaluation using synthetic and real-world DEMs,
Water Resour. Res.,
49, 75–89, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012WR012452" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012WR012452</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx89"><label>Pelletier et al.(2016)Pelletier, Nichols, and Nearing</label><?label pelletier2016influence?><mixed-citation>Pelletier, J. D., Nichols, M. H., and Nearing, M. A.: The influence of Holocene vegetation changes on topography and erosion rates: a case study at Walnut Gulch Experimental Watershed, Arizona, Earth Surf. Dynam., 4, 471–488, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-4-471-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/esurf-4-471-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx90"><label>Perron and Royden(2012)</label><?label perron2013integral?><mixed-citation>Perron, J. T. and Royden, L.:
An integral approach to bedrock river profile analysis,
Earth Surf. Proc. Land.,
38, 570–576, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3302" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/esp.3302</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx91"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Perron et~al.(2008{\natexlab{a}})Perron, Dietrich, and Kirchner}}?><label>Perron et al.(2008a)Perron, Dietrich, and Kirchner</label><?label perron2008controls?><mixed-citation>Perron, J. T., Dietrich, W. E., and Kirchner, J. W.:
Controls on the spacing of first-order valleys,
J. Geophys. Res.,
113, F04016, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JF000977" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007JF000977</ext-link>, 2008a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx92"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Perron et~al.(2008{\natexlab{b}})Perron, Kirchner, and Dietrich}}?><label>Perron et al.(2008b)Perron, Kirchner, and Dietrich</label><?label perron2008spectral?><mixed-citation>Perron, J. T., Kirchner, J. W., and Dietrich, W. E.:
Spectral signatures of characteristic spatial scales and nonfractal structure in landscapes,
J. Geophys. Res.,
113, F04003, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JF000866" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007JF000866</ext-link>, 2008b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx93"><label>Perron et al.(2009)Perron, Kirchner, and Dietrich</label><?label perron2009formation?><mixed-citation>Perron, J. T., Kirchner, J. W., and Dietrich, W. E.:
Formation of evenly spaced ridges and valleys,
Nature,
460, 502–505, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08174" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature08174</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx94"><label>R Core Team(2018)</label><?label rcoreteam2018r?><mixed-citation>R Core Team:
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing,
R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, <uri>https://www.r-project.org</uri>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx95"><label>Richardson et al.(2019)Richardson, Perron, and Schurr</label><?label richardson2019influences?><mixed-citation>Richardson, P. W., Perron, J. T., and Schurr, N. D.:
Influences of climate and life on hillslope sediment transport,
Geology,
47, 1–4, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1130/G45305.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1130/G45305.1</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx96"><label>Ritz(1992)</label><?label ritz1992recent?><mixed-citation>Ritz, J. F.:
Recent tectonics and seismotectonics in the southern Alps: stress analysis,
Quaternaire,
3, 111–124, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3406/quate.1992.1980" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3406/quate.1992.1980</ext-link>, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx97"><label>Roberts et al.(2012)Roberts, Paul, White, and Winterbourne</label><?label roberts2012temporal?><mixed-citation>Roberts, G. G., Paul, J. D., White, N., and Winterbourne, J.:
Temporal and spatial evolution of dynamic support from river profiles: A framework for Madagascar,
Geochem. Geophy. Geosy.,
13, 1–23, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GC004040" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012GC004040</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx98"><label>Roering et al.(1999)Roering, Kirchner, and Dietrich</label><?label roering1999evidence?><mixed-citation>Roering, J. J., Kirchner, J. W., and Dietrich, W. E.:
Evidence for nonlinear, diffusive sediment transport on hillslopes and implications for landscape morphology,
Water Resour. Res.,
35, 853–870, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1998WR900090" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/1998WR900090</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx99"><label>Roering et al.(2001)Roering, Kirchner, and Dietrich</label><?label roering2001hillslope?><mixed-citation>Roering, J. J., Kirchner, J. W., and Dietrich, W. E.:
Hillslope evolution by nonlinear, slope-dependent transport: Steady state morphology and equilibrium adjustment timescales,
J. Geophys. Res.,
106, 16499–16513, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JB000323" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001JB000323</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx100"><label>Roering et al.(2007)Roering, Perron, and Kirchner</label><?label roering2007functional?><mixed-citation>Roering, J. J., Perron, J. T., and Kirchner, J. W.:
Functional relationships between denudation and hillslope form and relief,
Earth Planet. Sc. Lett.,
264, 245–258, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2007.09.035" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.epsl.2007.09.035</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx101"><label>Roure et al.(1992)Roure, Brun, Colletta, and Van Den Driessche</label><?label roure1992geometry?><mixed-citation>Roure, F., Brun, J.-P., Colletta, B., and Van Den Driessche, J.:
Geometry and kinematics of extensional structures in the alpine foreland basin of southeastern France,
J. Struct. Geol.,
14, 503–519, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8141(92)90153-N" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0191-8141(92)90153-N</ext-link>, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx102"><label>Ryan and Cita(1978)</label><?label ryan1978nature?><mixed-citation>Ryan, W. B. and Cita, M. B.:
The nature and distribution of Messinian erosional surfaces – Indicators of a several-kilometer-deep Mediterranean in the Miocene,
Mar. Geol.,
27, 193–230, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0025-3227(78)90032-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0025-3227(78)90032-4</ext-link>, 1978.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx103"><label>Scherler et al.(2014)Scherler, Bookhagen, and Strecker</label><?label scherler2014tectonic?><mixed-citation>Scherler, D., Bookhagen, B., and Strecker, M. R.:
Tectonic control on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M473" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Be</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> derived erosion rates in the Garhwal Himalaya, India,
J. Geophys. Res.-Earth,
119, 1–23, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JF002955" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2013JF002955</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx104"><label>Schwartz et al.(2017)Schwartz, Gautheron, Audin, Dumont, Nomade, Barbarand, Pinna-Jamme, and van der Beek</label><?label schwartz2017foreland?><mixed-citation>Schwartz, S., Gautheron, C., Audin, L., Dumont, T., Nomade, J., Barbarand, J., Pinna-Jamme, R., and van der Beek, P.:
Foreland exhumation controlled by crustal thickening in the Western Alps,
Geology,
45, 139–142, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1130/G38561.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1130/G38561.1</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx105"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Siame et~al.(2004)Siame, Bellier, Braucher, S{\'{e}}brier, Cushing, Bourl{\`{e}}s, Hamelin, Baroux, de~Voogd, Raisbeck, and Yiou}}?><label>Siame et al.(2004)Siame, Bellier, Braucher, Sébrier, Cushing, Bourlès, Hamelin, Baroux, de Voogd, Raisbeck, and Yiou</label><?label siame2004local?><mixed-citation>Siame, L., Bellier, O., Braucher, R., Sébrier, M., Cushing, M., Bourlès, D., Hamelin, B., Baroux, E., de Voogd, B., Raisbeck, G., and Yiou, F.:
Local erosion rates versus active tectonics: cosmic ray exposure modelling in Provence (south-east France),
Earth Planet. Sc. Lett.,
220, 345–364, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0012-821X(04)00061-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0012-821X(04)00061-5</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx106"><label>Stevenson et al.(2010)Stevenson, Sun, and Mitchell</label><?label stevenson2010despeckling?><mixed-citation>Stevenson, J. A., Sun, X., and Mitchell, N. C.:
Despeckling SRTM and other topographic data with a denoising algorithm,
Geomorphology,
114, 238–252, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2009.07.006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.geomorph.2009.07.006</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx107"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Sue et~al.(1999)Sue, Thouvenot, Fr{\'{e}}chet, and Tricart}}?><label>Sue et al.(1999)Sue, Thouvenot, Fréchet, and Tricart</label><?label sue1999widespread?><mixed-citation>Sue, C., Thouvenot, F., Fréchet, J., and Tricart, P.:
Widespread extension in the core of the western Alps revealed by earthquake analysis,
J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea.,
104, 25611–25622, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JB900249" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/1999JB900249</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx108"><label>Sun et al.(2007)Sun, Rosin, Martin, and Langbein</label><?label sun2007fast?><mixed-citation>Sun, X., Rosin, P., Martin, R., and Langbein, F.:
Fast and Effective Feature-Preserving Mesh Denoising,
IEEE T. Vis. Comput. Gr.,
13, 925–938, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2007.1065" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1109/TVCG.2007.1065</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx109"><label>Thomas et al.(2017)Thomas, Godard, Bellier, Shabanian, Ollivier, Benedetti, Rizza, Espurt, Guillou, Hollender, and Molliex</label><?label thomas2017morphological?><mixed-citation>Thomas, F., Godard, V., Bellier, O., Shabanian, E., Ollivier, V., Benedetti, L., Rizza, M., Espurt, N., Guillou, V., Hollender, F., and Molliex, S.:
Morphological controls on the dynamics of carbonate landscapes under a mediterranean climate,
Terra Nova,
29, 173–182, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/ter.12260" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/ter.12260</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx110"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Thomas et~al.(2018)Thomas, Godard, Bellier, Benedetti, Ollivier, Rizza, Guillou, Hollender, Auma{\^{i}}tre, Bourl{\`{e}}s, and Keddadouche}}?><label>Thomas et al.(2018)Thomas, Godard, Bellier, Benedetti, Ollivier, Rizza, Guillou, Hollender, Aumaître, Bourlès, and Keddadouche</label><?label thomas2018limited?><mixed-citation>Thomas, F., Godard, V., Bellier, O., Benedetti, L., Ollivier, V., Rizza, M., Guillou, V., Hollender, F., Aumaître, G., Bourlès, D. L., and Keddadouche, K.:
Limited influence of climatic gradients on the denudation of a Mediterranean carbonate landscape,
Geomorphology,
316, 44–58, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2018.04.014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.geomorph.2018.04.014</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx111"><label>Tucker and Whipple(2002)</label><?label tucker2002topographic?><mixed-citation>Tucker, G. E. and Whipple, K. X.:
Topographic outcomes predicted by stream erosion models: Sensitivity analysis and intermodel comparison,
J. Geophys. Res.,
107, 2179, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JB000162" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001JB000162</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx112"><label>von Blanckenburg(2005)</label><?label vonblanckenburg2005control?><mixed-citation>von Blanckenburg, F.:
The control mechanisms of erosion and weathering at basin scale from cosmogenic nuclides in river sediment,
Earth Planet. Sc. Lett.,
237, 462–479, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2005.06.030" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.epsl.2005.06.030</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx113"><label>Walpersdorf et al.(2018)Walpersdorf, Pinget, Vernant, Sue, and Deprez</label><?label walpersdorf2018does?><mixed-citation>Walpersdorf, A., Pinget, L., Vernant, P., Sue, C., and Deprez, A.:
Does Long-Term GPS in the Western Alps Finally Confirm Earthquake Mechanisms?,
Tectonics,
37, 3721–3737, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018TC005054" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2018TC005054</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page243?><ref id="bib1.bibx114"><label>Ward and Valensise(1994)</label><?label ward1994palos?><mixed-citation>Ward, S. N. and Valensise, G.:
The Palos Verdes terraces, California: Bathtub rings from a buried reverse fault,
J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea.,
99, 4485–4494, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/93JB03362" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/93JB03362</ext-link>, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx115"><label>Whipple and Tucker(1999)</label><?label whipple1999dynamics?><mixed-citation>Whipple, K. X. and Tucker, G. E.:
Dynamics of the stream-power river incision model: Implications for height limits of mountain ranges, landscape response timescales, and research needs,
J. Geophys. Res.,
104, 17661–17674, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JB900120" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/1999JB900120</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx116"><label>Whittaker(2012)</label><?label whittaker2012how?><mixed-citation>Whittaker, A. C.:
How do landscapes record tectonics and climate?,
Lithosphere,
4, 160–164, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1130/RF.L003.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1130/RF.L003.1</ext-link>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx117"><label>Wickert and Schildgen(2019)</label><?label wickert2019long?><mixed-citation>Wickert, A. D. and Schildgen, T. F.: Long-profile evolution of transport-limited gravel-bed rivers, Earth Surf. Dynam., 7, 17–3, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-7-17-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/esurf-7-17-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx118"><label>Wobus et al.(2006)Wobus, Whipple, Kirby, Snyder, Johnson, Spyropolou, Crosby, and Sheehan</label><?label wobus2006tectonic?><mixed-citation>Wobus, C., Whipple, K. X., Kirby, E., Snyder, N. P., Johnson, J., Spyropolou, K., Crosby, B., and Sheehan, D.:
Tectonics from topography: Procedures, promise, and pitfalls,
Geol. S. Am. S.,
398, 55–74, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1130/0-8137-2398-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1130/0-8137-2398-1</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx119"><label>Yanites et al.(2009)Yanites, Tucker, and Anderson</label><?label yanites2009numerical?><mixed-citation>Yanites, B. J., Tucker, G. E., and Anderson, R. S.:
Numerical and analytical models of cosmogenic radionuclide dynamics in landslide-dominated drainage basins,
J. Geophys. Res.,
114, F01007, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JF001088" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008JF001088</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Hillslope denudation and morphologic response to a rock uplift gradient</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>Documenting the spatial variability of tectonic processes from topography is routinely undertaken through the analysis of river profiles, since
a direct relationship between fluvial gradient and rock uplift has been identified by incision models. Similarly, theoretical formulations of
hillslope profiles predict a strong dependence on their base-level lowering rate, which in most situations is set by channel incision. However, the
reduced sensitivity of near-threshold hillslopes and the limited availability of high-resolution topographic data has often been a major limitation
for their use to investigate tectonic gradients. Here we combined high-resolution analysis of hillslope morphology and cosmogenic-nuclide-derived
denudation rates to unravel the distribution of rock uplift across a blind thrust system at the southwestern Alpine front in France. Our study is
located in the Mio-Pliocene Valensole molassic basin, where a series of folds and thrusts has deformed a plateau surface. We focused on a series of
catchments aligned perpendicular to the main structures. Using a 1&thinsp;m lidar digital terrain model, we extracted hillslope topographic properties
such as hilltop curvature <i>C</i><sub>HT</sub> and nondimensional erosion rates <i>E</i><sup>∗</sup>.
We observed systematic variation of these metrics coincident with
the location of a major underlying thrust system identified by seismic surveys. Using a simple deformation model, the inversion of the <i>E</i><sup>∗</sup> pattern
allows us to propose a location and dip for a blind thrust, which are consistent with available geological and geophysical data. We also sampled
clasts from eroding conglomerates at several hilltop locations for <sup>10</sup>Be and <sup>26</sup>Al concentration measurements. Calculated hilltop
denudation rates range from 40 to 120&thinsp;mm kyr<sup>−1</sup>. These denudation rates appear to be correlated with <i>E</i><sup>∗</sup> and <i>C</i><sub>HT</sub> that were extracted
from the morphological analysis, and these rates are used to derive absolute estimates for the fault slip rate. This high-resolution hillslope analysis allows
us to resolve short-wavelength variations in rock uplift that would not be possible to unravel using commonly used channel-profile-based
methods. Our joint analysis of topography and geochronological data supports the interpretation of active thrusting at the southwestern Alpine
front, and such approaches may bring crucial complementary constraints to morphotectonic analysis for the study of slowly slipping faults.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>Arnold et al.(2010)Arnold, Merchel, Bourlès, Braucher, Benedetti, Finkel, Aumaître, Gottdang, and Klein</label><mixed-citation>
Arnold, M., Merchel, S., Bourlès, D. L., Braucher, R., Benedetti, L., Finkel, R. C., Aumaître, G., Gottdang, A., and Klein, M.:
The French accelerator mass spectrometry facility ASTER: Improved performance and developments,
Nucl. Instrum. Meth. B,
268, 1954–1959, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2010.02.107" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2010.02.107</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>Balco(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
Balco, G.:
Production rate calculations for cosmic-ray-muon-produced <sup>10</sup>Be and <sup>26</sup>Al benchmarked against geological calibration data,
Quat. Geochronol.,
39, 150–173, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quageo.2017.02.001" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quageo.2017.02.001</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>Balco et al.(2008)Balco, Stone, Lifton, and Dunai</label><mixed-citation>
Balco, G., Stone, J. O., Lifton, N. A., and Dunai, T. J.:
A complete and easily accessible means of calculating surface exposure ages or erosion rates from <sup>10</sup>Be and <sup>26</sup>Al measurements,
Quat. Geochronol.,
3, 174–195, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quageo.2007.12.001" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quageo.2007.12.001</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>Baroux et al.(2003)Baroux, Pino, Valensise, Scotti, and Cushing</label><mixed-citation>
Baroux, E., Pino, N. A., Valensise, G., Scotti, O., and Cushing, M. E.:
Source parameters of the 11 June 1909, Lambesc (Provence, southeastern France) earthquake: A reappraisal based on macroseismic, seismological, and geodetic observations,
J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea.,
108, 2454, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JB002348" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JB002348</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>Beck et al.(1998)Beck, Deville, Blanc, Philippe, and Tardy</label><mixed-citation>
Beck, C., Deville, E., Blanc, E., Philippe, Y., and Tardy, M.:
Horizontal shortening control of Middle Miocene marine siliciclastic accumulation (Upper Marine Molasse) in the southern termination of the Savoy Molasse Basin (northwestern Alps/southern Jura),
Geol. Soc. Spec. Publ.,
134, 263–278, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.1998.134.01.12" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.1998.134.01.12</a>, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>Benedetti et al.(2000)Benedetti, Tapponnier, King, Meyer, and Manighetti</label><mixed-citation>
Benedetti, L., Tapponnier, P., King, G. C. P., Meyer, B., and Manighetti, I.:
Growth folding and active thrusting in the Montello region, Veneto, northern Italy,
J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea.,
105, 739–766, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JB900222" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JB900222</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>Borchers et al.(2016)Borchers, Marrero, Balco, Caffee, Goehring, Lifton, Nishiizumi, Phillips, Schaefer, and Stone</label><mixed-citation>
Borchers, B., Marrero, S., Balco, G., Caffee, M., Goehring, B., Lifton, N., Nishiizumi, K., Phillips, F., Schaefer, J., and Stone, J.:
Geological calibration of spallation production rates in the CRONUS-Earth project,
Quat. Geochronol.,
31, 188–198, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quageo.2015.01.009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quageo.2015.01.009</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>Boulton et al.(2014)Boulton, Stokes, and Mather</label><mixed-citation>
Boulton, S., Stokes, M., and Mather, A.:
Transient fluvial incision as an indicator of active faulting and Plio-Quaternary uplift of the Moroccan High Atlas,
Tectonophysics,
633, 16–33, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2014.06.032" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2014.06.032</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>Brown et al.(1991)Brown, Edmond, Raisbeck, Yiou, Kurz, and Brook</label><mixed-citation>
Brown, E. T., Edmond, J. M., Raisbeck, G. M., Yiou, F., Kurz, M. D., and Brook, E. J.:
Examination of surface exposure ages of Antarctic moraines using in situ produced <sup>10</sup>Be and <sup>26</sup>Al,
Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac.,
55, 2269–2283, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(91)90103-C" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(91)90103-C</a>, 1991.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>Burbank et al.(1996)Burbank, Leland, Fielding, Anderson, Brozovic, Reid, and Duncan</label><mixed-citation>
Burbank, D. W., Leland, J., Fielding, E., Anderson, R. S., Brozovic, N., Reid, M. R., and Duncan, C.:
Bedrock incision, rock uplift and threshold hillslopes in the northwestern Himalayas,
Nature,
379, 505–510, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/379505a0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/379505a0</a>, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>Champagnac et al.(2007)Champagnac, Molnar, Anderson, Sue, and Delacou</label><mixed-citation>
Champagnac, J., Molnar, P., Anderson, R., Sue, C., and Delacou, B.:
Quaternary erosion-induced isostatic rebound in the western Alps,
Geology,
35, 195, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1130/G23053A.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1130/G23053A.1</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>Champagnac et al.(2008)Champagnac, van der Beek, Diraison, and Dauphin</label><mixed-citation>
Champagnac, J.-D., van der Beek, P., Diraison, G., and Dauphin, S.:
Flexural isostatic response of the Alps to increased Quaternary erosion recorded by foreland basin remnants, SE France,
Terra Nova,
20, 213–220, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3121.2008.00809.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3121.2008.00809.x</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>Champagnac et al.(2012)Champagnac, Molnar, Sue, and Herman</label><mixed-citation>
Champagnac, J.-D., Molnar, P., Sue, C., and Herman, F.:
Tectonics, climate, and mountain topography,
J. Geophys. Res.,
117, B02403, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JB008348" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JB008348</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>Chardon and Bellier(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
Chardon, D. and Bellier, O.:
Geological boundary conditions of the 1909 Lambesc (Provence, France) earthquake: structure and evolution of the Trévaresse ridge anticline,
B. Soc. Geol. Fr.,
174, 497–510, <a href="https://doi.org/10.2113/174.5.497" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2113/174.5.497</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>Chardon et al.(2005)Chardon, Hermitte, Nguyen, and Bellier</label><mixed-citation>
Chardon, D., Hermitte, D., Nguyen, F., and Bellier, O.:
First <span style="" class="text">paleoseismological</span> constraints on the strongest earthquake in France (Provence) in the twentieth century,
Geology,
33, 901–904, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1130/G21713.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1130/G21713.1</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>Clauzon(1982)</label><mixed-citation>
Clauzon, G.:
The Messinian Rhone canyon as a definite proof of the “desiccated deep-basin model”,
B. Soc. Geol. Fr.,
S7-XXIV, 597–610, <a href="https://doi.org/10.2113/gssgfbull.S7-XXIV.3.597" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2113/gssgfbull.S7-XXIV.3.597</a>, 1982.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>Clauzon(1996)</label><mixed-citation>
Clauzon, G.:
Sequence boundaries and geodynamic evolution,
Geomorphologie,
2, 3–21, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>Clauzon et al.(1989)Clauzon, Aguilar, and Michaux</label><mixed-citation>
Clauzon, G., Aguilar, J. P., and Michaux, J.:
Investigation of the time-sedimentation relation thanks to examples taken from the French Mediterranean Neogene,
B. Soc. Geol. Fr.,
V, 361–372, <a href="https://doi.org/10.2113/gssgfbull.v.2.361" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2113/gssgfbull.v.2.361</a>, 1989.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>Clauzon et al.(2011)Clauzon, Fleury, Bellier, Molliex, Mocochain, and Aguilar</label><mixed-citation>
Clauzon, G., Fleury, T. J., Bellier, O., Molliex, S., Mocochain, L., and Aguilar, J. P.:
Morphostructural evolution of the Luberon since the Miocene (SE France),
B. Soc. Geol. Fr.,
182, 95–110, <a href="https://doi.org/10.2113/gssgfbull.182.2.95" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2113/gssgfbull.182.2.95</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>Clubb et al.(2014)Clubb, Mudd, Milodowski, Hurst, and Slater</label><mixed-citation>
Clubb, F. J., Mudd, S. M., Milodowski, D. T., Hurst, M. D., and Slater, L. J.:
Objective extraction of channel heads from high-resolution topographic data,
Water Resour. Res.,
50, 4283–4304, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013WR015167" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2013WR015167</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>Clubb et al.(2016)Clubb, Mudd, Attal, Milodowski, and Grieve</label><mixed-citation>
Clubb, F. J., Mudd, S. M., Attal, M., Milodowski, D. T., and Grieve, S. W.:
The relationship between drainage density, erosion rate, and hilltop curvature: Implications for sediment transport processes,
J. Geophys. Res.-Earth,
121, 1724–1745, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JF003747" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JF003747</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>Clubb et al.(2017)Clubb, Mudd, Milodowski, Valters, Slater, Hurst, and Limaye</label><mixed-citation>
Clubb, F. J., Mudd, S. M., Milodowski, D. T., Valters, D. A., Slater, L. J., Hurst, M. D., and Limaye, A. B.: Geomorphometric delineation of floodplains and terraces from objectively defined topographic thresholds, Earth Surf. Dynam., 5, 369–385, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-5-369-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-5-369-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>Clubb et al.(2020)Clubb, Mudd, Hurst, and Grieve</label><mixed-citation>
Clubb, F. J., Mudd, S. M., Hurst, M. D., and Grieve, S. W.:
Differences in channel and hillslope geometry record a migrating uplift wave at the Mendocino triple junction, California, USA,
Geology,
48, 184–188, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1130/G46939.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1130/G46939.1</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>Collina-Girard and Griboulard(1990)</label><mixed-citation>
Collina-Girard, J. and Griboulard, R.:
The deep-structure of the Valensole Plateau (French Alps). Contribution of network valley and topographic analysis,
Géologie méditerranéenne,
17, 153–171, <a href="https://www.persee.fr/doc/geolm_0397-2844_1990_num_17_2_1439" target="_blank"/> (last access: 4 January 2017), 1990.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>Cushing et al.(2008)Cushing, Bellier, Nechtschein, Sébrier, Lomax, Volant, Dervin, Guignard, and Bove</label><mixed-citation>
Cushing, E. M., Bellier, O., Nechtschein, S., Sébrier, M., Lomax, A., Volant, P., Dervin, P., Guignard, P., and Bove, L.:
A multidisciplinary study of a slow-slipping fault for seismic hazard assessment: the example of the Middle Durance Fault (SE France),
Geophys. J. Int.,
172, 1163–1178, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2007.03683.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2007.03683.x</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>Cyr et al.(2010)Cyr, Granger, Olivetti, and Molin</label><mixed-citation>
Cyr, A. J., Granger, D. E., Olivetti, V., and Molin, P.:
Quantifying rock uplift rates using channel steepness and cosmogenic nuclide-determined erosion rates: Examples from northern and southern Italy,
Lithosphere,
2, 188–198, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1130/L96.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1130/L96.1</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>Delacou et al.(2005)Delacou, Sue, Champagnac, and Burkhard</label><mixed-citation>
Delacou, B., Sue, C., Champagnac, J.-D., and Burkhard, M.:
Origin of the current stress field in the western/central Alps: role of gravitational re-equilibration constrained by numerical modelling,
Geol. Soc. Spec. Publ.,
243, 295–310, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.2005.243.01.19" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.2005.243.01.19</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>Demoulin(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Demoulin, A.:
Morphometric dating of the fluvial landscape response to a tectonic perturbation,
Geophys. Res. Lett.,
39, 1–5, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL052201" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL052201</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>DiBiase and Whipple(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
DiBiase, R. A. and Whipple, K. X.:
The influence of erosion thresholds and runoff variability on the relationships among topography, climate, and erosion rate,
J. Geophys. Res.,
116, F04036, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JF002095" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JF002095</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>DiBiase et al.(2012)DiBiase, Heimsath, and Whipple</label><mixed-citation>
DiBiase, R. A., Heimsath, A. M., and Whipple, K. X.:
Hillslope response to tectonic forcing in threshold landscapes,
Earth Surf. Proc. Land.,
37, 855–865, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3205" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3205</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>Dietrich et al.(2003)Dietrich, Bellugi, Sklar, Stock, Heimsath, and Roering</label><mixed-citation>
Dietrich, W. E., Bellugi, D. G., Sklar, L. S., Stock, J. D., Heimsath, A. M., and Roering, J. J.:
Geomorphic transport laws for predicting landscape form and dynamics,
in: Prediction in Geomorphology,
edited by:
Wilcock, P. R. and Iverson, R. M.,
vol. 135 of Geophysical Monograph Series, pp. 103–132,
American Geophysical Union, Washington, D.C., USA, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/GM135" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/GM135</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>Dubar(1984a)</label><mixed-citation>
Dubar, M.:
Chronology and significance of the late Neogene deposits of Riez-Valensole basin (Alpes-de-Haute-Provence, France),
B. Soc. Geol. Fr.,
S7-XXVI, 971–978, <a href="https://doi.org/10.2113/gssgfbull.S7-XXVI.5.971" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2113/gssgfbull.S7-XXVI.5.971</a>, 1984a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>Dubar(1984b)</label><mixed-citation>
Dubar, M.:
Fluviatile terraces in South of the Alps,
Bulletin de l'Association française pour l'étude du quaternaire,
21, 134–138, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3406/quate.1984.1501" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3406/quate.1984.1501</a>, 1984b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>Dubar(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Dubar, M.:
Correlation of the villafranchian mammalian sites of Puimoisson (valensole basin, Alpes de Haute-Provence, France) and others dated sites (palaeomagnetism, radionuclides) of Southern Europe (France, Italy and Spain),
Quaternaire,
25, 85–90, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>Dubar and Semah(1986)</label><mixed-citation>
Dubar, M. and Semah, F.:
Paleomagnetic Data Bearing on the Age of High Terrace Deposits (Durance Sequence) in Alpine Valleys of Southeastern France,
Quaternary Res.,
25, 387–391, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0033-5894(86)90009-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0033-5894(86)90009-8</a>, 1986.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>Dubar et al.(1978)Dubar, Guerin, and Heintz</label><mixed-citation>
Dubar, M., Guerin, C., and Heintz, E.:
Les nouveaux gisements villafranchiens du ravin de Cornillet (Moustiers Sainte-Marie, Alpes de Haute Provence, France) et leur contexte géologique,
Geobios,
11, 367–381, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-6995(78)80036-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-6995(78)80036-9</a>, 1978.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>Dubar et al.(1998)Dubar, Aguilar, Chaline, Michaux, and Semah</label><mixed-citation>
Dubar, M., Aguilar, J. P., Chaline, J., Michaux, J., and Semah, F.:
Chronological data (mammalian faunas, paleomagnetism) on the Plio-Pleistocene deposits from the top of the Valensole Basin: morphodynamic implications,
Géologie de la France,
1, 57–68, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>Dubois and Curnelle(1978)</label><mixed-citation>
Dubois, P. and Curnelle, R.:
Résultats apportés par le forage les Mées no. 1 sur le plateau de Valensole (Alpes de Haute-Provence),
Comptes-Rendus Sommaires des séance de la Société Géologique de France,
4, 181–184, 1978.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>Duvall et al.(2004)Duvall, Kirby, and Burbank</label><mixed-citation>
Duvall, A., Kirby, E., and Burbank, D. W.:
Tectonic and lithologic controls on bedrock channel profiles and processes in coastal California,
J. Geophys. Res.,
109, F03002, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JF000086" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JF000086</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>Fox et al.(2014)Fox, Goren, May, and Willett</label><mixed-citation>
Fox, M., Goren, L., May, D. A., and Willett, S. D.:
Inversion of fluvial channels for paleorock uplift rates in Taiwan,
J. Geophys. Res.-Earth,
119, 1853–1875, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JF003196" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JF003196</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>Gabert(1979)</label><mixed-citation>
Gabert, J.:
Les terrasses de la Moyenne Durance,
Bulletin de l'Association française pour l'étude du quaternaire,
16, 101–108, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3406/quate.1979.1352" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3406/quate.1979.1352</a>, 1979.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>Gallen et al.(2013)Gallen, Wegmann, and Bohnenstiehl</label><mixed-citation>
Gallen, S. F., Wegmann, K. W., and Bohnenstiehl, D. W. R.:
Miocene rejuvenation of topographic relief in the southern Appalachians,
GSA Today,
23, 4–10, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1130/GSATG163A.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1130/GSATG163A.1</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>Gelman and Rubin(1992)</label><mixed-citation>
Gelman, A. and Rubin, D. B.:
Inference from Iterative Simulation Using Multiple Sequences,
Stat. Sci.,
7, 457–472, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1214/ss/1177011136" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1214/ss/1177011136</a>, 1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>Gidon and Pairis(1988)</label><mixed-citation>
Gidon, M. and Pairis, J.-L.:
An example of the influence of coevel sedimentation on structures developed at the front of a thrust sheet moving in free-air: the structure of the region around Digne (SE France),
Comptes rendus de l'Académie des Sciences,
307, 1283–1288, 1988.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>Glennie et al.(2013)Glennie, Carter, Shrestha, and Dietrich</label><mixed-citation>
Glennie, C. L., Carter, W. E., Shrestha, R. L., and Dietrich, W. E.:
Geodetic imaging with airborne LiDAR: the Earth's surface revealed,
Rep. Prog. Phys.,
76, 086801, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/76/8/086801" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/76/8/086801</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>Godard et al.(2016)Godard, Ollivier, Bellier, Miramont, Shabanian, Fleury, Benedetti, and Guillou</label><mixed-citation>
Godard, V., Ollivier, V., Bellier, O., Miramont, C., Shabanian, E., Fleury, J., Benedetti, L., and Guillou, V.:
Weathering-limited hillslope evolution in carbonate landscapes,
Earth Planet. Sc. Lett.,
446, 10–20, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2016.04.017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2016.04.017</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>Godard et al.(2019)Godard, Dosseto, Fleury, Bellier, Siame, and ASTER</label><mixed-citation>
Godard, V., Dosseto, A., Fleury, J., Bellier, O., Siame, L., and ASTER Team:
Transient landscape dynamics across the Southeastern Australian Escarpment,
Earth Planet. Sc. Lett.,
506, 397–406, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2018.11.017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2018.11.017</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>Grieve et al.(2016a)Grieve, Mudd, and Hurst</label><mixed-citation>
Grieve, S. W., Mudd, S. M., and Hurst, M. D.:
How long is a hillslope?,
Earth Surf. Proc. Land.,
41, 1039–1054, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3884" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3884</a>, 2016a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>Grieve et al.(2016b)Grieve, Mudd, Hurst, and Milodowski</label><mixed-citation>
Grieve, S. W. D., Mudd, S. M., Hurst, M. D., and Milodowski, D. T.: A nondimensional framework for exploring the relief structure of landscapes, Earth Surf. Dynam., 4, 309–325, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-4-309-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-4-309-2016</a>, 2016b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>Grieve et al.(2016c)Grieve, Mudd, Milodowski, Clubb, and Furbish</label><mixed-citation>
Grieve, S. W. D., Mudd, S. M., Milodowski, D. T., Clubb, F. J., and Furbish, D. J.: How does grid-resolution modulate the topographic expression of geomorphic processes?, Earth Surf. Dynam., 4, 627–653, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-4-627-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-4-627-2016</a>, 2016c.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>Harel et al.(2016)Harel, Mudd, and Attal</label><mixed-citation>
Harel, M.-a., Mudd, S., and Attal, M.:
Global analysis of the stream power law parameters based on worldwide 10Be denudation rates,
Geomorphology,
268, 184–196, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2016.05.035" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2016.05.035</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>Hippolyte and Dumont(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
Hippolyte, J.-C. and Dumont, T.:
Identification of Quaternary thrusts, folds and faults in a low seismicity area: examples in the Southern Alps (France),
Terra Nova,
12, 156–162, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>Hippolyte et al.(2011)Hippolyte, Clauzon, and Suc</label><mixed-citation>
Hippolyte, J.-C., Clauzon, G., and Suc, J.-P.:
Messinian-Zanclean canyons in the Digne nappe (southwestern Alps): tectonic implications,
B. Soc. Geol. Fr.,
182, 111–132, <a href="https://doi.org/10.2113/gssgfbull.182.2.111" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2113/gssgfbull.182.2.111</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>Howard(1994)</label><mixed-citation>
Howard, A. D.:
A detachment-limited model of drainage basin evolution,
Water Resour. Res.,
30, 2261–2285, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/94WR00757" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/94WR00757</a>, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>Hsü et al.(1977)Hsü, Montadert, Bernoulli, Cita, Erickson, Garrison, Kidd, Mèlierés, Müller, and Wright</label><mixed-citation>
Hsü, K. J., Montadert, L., Bernoulli, D., Cita, M. B., Erickson, A., Garrison, R. E., Kidd, R. B., Mèlierés, F., Müller, C., and Wright, R.:
History of the Mediterranean salinity crisis,
Nature,
267, 399–403, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/267399a0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/267399a0</a>, 1977.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>Hurst et al.(2012)Hurst, Mudd, Walcott, Attal, and Yoo</label><mixed-citation>
Hurst, M. D., Mudd, S. M., Walcott, R., Attal, M., and Yoo, K.:
Using hilltop curvature to derive the spatial distribution of erosion rates,
J. Geophys. Res.,
117, F02017, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JF002057" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JF002057</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>Hurst et al.(2013a)Hurst, Mudd, Attal, and Hilley</label><mixed-citation>
Hurst, M. D., Mudd, S. M., Attal, M., and Hilley, G.:
Hillslopes record the growth and decay of landscapes,
Science,
341, 868–871, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1241791" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1241791</a>, 2013a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>Hurst et al.(2013b)Hurst, Mudd, Yoo, Attal, and Walcott</label><mixed-citation>
Hurst, M. D., Mudd, S. M., Yoo, K., Attal, M., and Walcott, R.:
Influence of lithology on hillslope morphology and response to tectonic forcing in the northern Sierra Nevada of California,
J. Geophys. Res.-Earth,
118, 832–851, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrf.20049" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrf.20049</a>, 2013b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>Hurst et al.(2019)Hurst, Grieve, Clubb, and Mudd</label><mixed-citation>
Hurst, M. D., Grieve, S. W., Clubb, F. J., and Mudd, S. M.:
Detection of channel-hillslope coupling along a tectonic gradient,
Earth Planet. Sc. Lett.,
522, 30–39, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2019.06.018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2019.06.018</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>IGN(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
IGN: Composante altimetrique du RGE<span style="position:relative; bottom:0.5em; " class="text">®</span>, available at: <a href="http://www.ign.fr/institut/activites/referentiel-a-grande-echelle" target="_blank"/>, last access: 1 September 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>James and Robson(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
James, M. R. and Robson, S.:
Straightforward reconstruction of 3D surfaces and topography with a camera: Accuracy and geoscience application,
J. Geophys. Res.,
117, F03017, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JF002289" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JF002289</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>Jouanne et al.(2001)Jouanne, Hippolyte, Gamond, and Martinod</label><mixed-citation>
Jouanne, F., Hippolyte, J. C., Gamond, J. F., and Martinod, J.:
Current deformation of the Digne Nappe (southwestern Alps) from a comparison between triangulation and GPS data,
Geophys. J. Int.,
144, 432–440, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-246x.2001.00338.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-246x.2001.00338.x</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>Kirby and Whipple(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Kirby, E. and Whipple, K. X.:
Expression of active tectonics in erosional landscapes,
J. Struct. Geol.,
44, 54–75, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2012.07.009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2012.07.009</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>Kirby et al.(2003)Kirby, Whipple, Tang, and Chen</label><mixed-citation>
Kirby, E., Whipple, K. X., Tang, W., and Chen, Z.:
Distribution of active rock uplift along the eastern margin of the Tibetan Plateau: Inferences from bedrock channel longitudinal profiles,
J. Geophys. Res.,
108, 2217, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JB000861" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JB000861</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>Lague(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Lague, D.:
The stream power river incision model: Evidence, theory and beyond,
Earth Surf. Proc. Land.,
39, 38–61, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3462" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3462</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>Lague and Davy(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
Lague, D. and Davy, P.:
Constraints on the long-term colluvial erosion law by analyzing slope-area relationships at various tectonic uplift rates in the Siwaliks Hills (Nepal),
J. Geophys. Res.,
108, 2129, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JB001893" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JB001893</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>Lashermes et al.(2007)Lashermes, Foufoula-Georgiou, and Dietrich</label><mixed-citation>
Lashermes, B., Foufoula-Georgiou, E., and Dietrich, W. E.:
Channel network extraction from high resolution topography using wavelets,
Geophys. Res. Lett.,
34, L23S04, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL031140" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL031140</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>Le Roux-Mallouf et al.(2015)Le Roux-Mallouf, Godard, Cattin, Ferry, Gyeltshen, Ritz, Drupka, Guillou, Arnold, Aumaître, Bourlès, and Keddadouche</label><mixed-citation>
Le Roux-Mallouf, R., Godard, V., Cattin, R., Ferry, M., Gyeltshen, J., Ritz, J.-F., Drupka, D., Guillou, V., Arnold, M., Aumaître, G., Bourlès, D. L., and Keddadouche, K.:
Evidence for a wide and gently dipping Main Himalayan Thrust in western Bhutan,
Geophys. Res. Lett.,
42, 3257–3265, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL063767" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL063767</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>Lickorish and Ford(1998)</label><mixed-citation>
Lickorish, W. H. and Ford, M.:
Sequential restoration of the external Alpine Digne thrust system, SE France, constrained by kinematic data and synorogenic sediments,
Geol. Soc. Spec. Publ.,
134, 189–211, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.1998.134.01.09" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.1998.134.01.09</a>, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>Lifton et al.(2014)Lifton, Sato, and Dunai</label><mixed-citation>
Lifton, N., Sato, T., and Dunai, T. J.:
Scaling in situ cosmogenic nuclide production rates using analytical approximations to atmospheric cosmic-ray fluxes,
Earth Planet. Sc. Lett.,
386, 149–160, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2013.10.052" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2013.10.052</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>Merchel and Bremser(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
Merchel, S. and Bremser, W.:
First international 26Al interlaboratory comparison – Part I,
Nucl. Instrum. Meth. B,
223-224, 393–400, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2004.04.076" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2004.04.076</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>Merchel et al.(2008)Merchel, Arnold, Aumaître, Benedetti, Bourlès, Braucher, Alfimov, Freeman, Steier, and Wallner</label><mixed-citation>
Merchel, S., Arnold, M., Aumaître, G., Benedetti, L., Bourlès, D., Braucher, R., Alfimov, V., Freeman, S., Steier, P., and Wallner, A.:
Towards more precise <sup>10</sup>Be and <sup>36</sup>Cl data from measurements at the 10–14 level: Influence of sample preparation,
Nucl. Instrum. Meth. B,
266, 4921–4926, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2008.07.031" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2008.07.031</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>Mercier(1979)</label><mixed-citation>
Mercier, H.:
Le Néogène et le Pléistocène inférieur duranciens,
Géologie Alpine,
55, 111–132, 1979.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>Metropolis et al.(1953)Metropolis, Rosenbluth, Rosenbluth, Teller, and Teller</label><mixed-citation>
Metropolis, N., Rosenbluth, A. W., Rosenbluth, M. N., Teller, A. H., and Teller, E.:
Equation of State Calculations by Fast Computing Machines,
J. Chem. Phys.,
21, 1087–1092, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1699114" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1699114</a>, 1953.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>Milodowski et al.(2015)Milodowski, Mudd, and Mitchard</label><mixed-citation>
Milodowski, D. T., Mudd, S. M., and Mitchard, E. T. A.: Topographic roughness as a signature of the emergence of bedrock in eroding landscapes, Earth Surf. Dynam., 3, 483–499, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-3-483-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-3-483-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>Mitasova et al.(1996)Mitasova, Hofierka, Zlocha, and Iverson</label><mixed-citation>
Mitasova, H., Hofierka, J., Zlocha, M., and Iverson, L. R.:
Modelling topographic potential for erosion and deposition using GIS,
Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Syst.,
10, 629–641, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02693799608902101" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02693799608902101</a>, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>Morell et al.(2015)Morell, Sandiford, Rajendran, Rajendran, and Sanwal</label><mixed-citation>
Morell, K. D., Sandiford, M., Rajendran, C. P., Rajendran, K., and Sanwal, J.:
Geomorphology reveals seismogenic structures in the central Himalayan seismic gap,
Lithosphere,
7, 247–256, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1130/L407.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1130/L407.1</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>Mudd(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
Mudd, S. M.:
Detection of transience in eroding landscapes,
Earth Surf. Proc. Land.,
42, 24–41, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3923" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3923</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>Myers et al.(2003)Myers, Nabelek, and Yeats</label><mixed-citation>
Myers, D. J., Nabelek, J. L., and Yeats, R. S.:
Dislocation modeling of blind thrusts in the eastern Los Angeles basin, California,
J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea.,
108, 2443, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002jb002150" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2002jb002150</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>Neely et al.(2019)Neely, DiBiase, Corbett, Bierman, and Caffee</label><mixed-citation>
Neely, A. B., DiBiase, R. A., Corbett, L. B., Bierman, P. R., and Caffee, M. W.:
Bedrock fracture density controls on hillslope erodibility in steep, rocky landscapes with patchy soil cover, southern California, USA,
Earth Planet. Sc. Lett.,
522, 186–197, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2019.06.011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2019.06.011</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>Neteler et al.(2012)Neteler, Bowman, Landa, and Metz</label><mixed-citation>
Neteler, M., Bowman, M. H., Landa, M., and Metz, M.:
GRASS GIS: A multi-purpose open source GIS,
Environ. Modell. Softw.,
31, 124–130, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.11.014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.11.014</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>Nicolas et al.(1990)Nicolas, Santoire, and Delpech</label><mixed-citation>
Nicolas, M., Santoire, J., and Delpech, P.:
Intraplate seismicity: new seismotectonic data in Western Europe,
Tectonophysics,
179, 27–53, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(90)90354-B" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(90)90354-B</a>, 1990.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>Nishiizumi et al.(2007)Nishiizumi, Imamura, Caffee, Southon, Finkel, and McAninch</label><mixed-citation>
Nishiizumi, K., Imamura, M., Caffee, M. W., Southon, J. R., Finkel, R. C., and McAninch, J.:
Absolute calibration of <sup>10</sup>Be AMS standards,
Nucl. Instrum. Meth. B,
258, 403–413, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2007.01.297" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2007.01.297</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib84"><label>Nocquet et al.(2016)Nocquet, Sue, Walpersdorf, Tran, Lenôtre, Vernant, Cushing, Jouanne, Masson, Baize, Chéry, and van der Beek</label><mixed-citation>
Nocquet, J.-M., Sue, C., Walpersdorf, A., Tran, T., Lenôtre, N., Vernant, P., Cushing, M., Jouanne, F., Masson, F., Baize, S., Chéry, J., and van der Beek, P. A.:
Present-day uplift of the western Alps,
Sci. Rep.-UK,
6, 28&thinsp;404, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep28404" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/srep28404</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib85"><label>Okada(1985)</label><mixed-citation>
Okada, Y.:
Surface deformation due to shear and tensile faults in a half-space,
B. Seismol. Soc. Am.,
75, 1135–1154, 1985.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib86"><label>Ouimet et al.(2009)Ouimet, Whipple, and Granger</label><mixed-citation>
Ouimet, W. B., Whipple, K. X., and Granger, D. E.:
Beyond threshold hillslopes: Channel adjustment to base-level fall in tectonically active mountain ranges,
Geology,
37, 579–582, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1130/G30013A.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1130/G30013A.1</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib87"><label>Passalacqua et al.(2015)Passalacqua, Belmont, Staley, Simley, Arrowsmith, Bode, Crosby, DeLong, Glenn, Kelly, Lague, Sangireddy, Schaffrath, Tarboton, Wasklewicz, and Wheaton</label><mixed-citation>
Passalacqua, P., Belmont, P., Staley, D. M., Simley, J. D., Arrowsmith, J. R., Bode, C. a., Crosby, C., DeLong, S. B., Glenn, N. F., Kelly, S. a., Lague, D., Sangireddy, H., Schaffrath, K., Tarboton, D. G., Wasklewicz, T., and Wheaton, J. M.:
Analyzing high resolution topography for advancing the understanding of mass and energy transfer through landscapes: A review,
Earth-Sci. Rev.,
148, 174–193, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2015.05.012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2015.05.012</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib88"><label>Pelletier(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Pelletier, J. D.:
A robust, two-parameter method for the extraction of drainage networks from high-resolution digital elevation models (DEMs): Evaluation using synthetic and real-world DEMs,
Water Resour. Res.,
49, 75–89, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012WR012452" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2012WR012452</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib89"><label>Pelletier et al.(2016)Pelletier, Nichols, and Nearing</label><mixed-citation>
Pelletier, J. D., Nichols, M. H., and Nearing, M. A.: The influence of Holocene vegetation changes on topography and erosion rates: a case study at Walnut Gulch Experimental Watershed, Arizona, Earth Surf. Dynam., 4, 471–488, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-4-471-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-4-471-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib90"><label>Perron and Royden(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Perron, J. T. and Royden, L.:
An integral approach to bedrock river profile analysis,
Earth Surf. Proc. Land.,
38, 570–576, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3302" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3302</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib91"><label>Perron et al.(2008a)Perron, Dietrich, and Kirchner</label><mixed-citation>
Perron, J. T., Dietrich, W. E., and Kirchner, J. W.:
Controls on the spacing of first-order valleys,
J. Geophys. Res.,
113, F04016, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JF000977" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JF000977</a>, 2008a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib92"><label>Perron et al.(2008b)Perron, Kirchner, and Dietrich</label><mixed-citation>
Perron, J. T., Kirchner, J. W., and Dietrich, W. E.:
Spectral signatures of characteristic spatial scales and nonfractal structure in landscapes,
J. Geophys. Res.,
113, F04003, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JF000866" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JF000866</a>, 2008b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib93"><label>Perron et al.(2009)Perron, Kirchner, and Dietrich</label><mixed-citation>
Perron, J. T., Kirchner, J. W., and Dietrich, W. E.:
Formation of evenly spaced ridges and valleys,
Nature,
460, 502–505, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08174" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08174</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib94"><label>R Core Team(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
R Core Team:
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing,
R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, <a href="https://www.r-project.org" target="_blank"/>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib95"><label>Richardson et al.(2019)Richardson, Perron, and Schurr</label><mixed-citation>
Richardson, P. W., Perron, J. T., and Schurr, N. D.:
Influences of climate and life on hillslope sediment transport,
Geology,
47, 1–4, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1130/G45305.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1130/G45305.1</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib96"><label>Ritz(1992)</label><mixed-citation>
Ritz, J. F.:
Recent tectonics and seismotectonics in the southern Alps: stress analysis,
Quaternaire,
3, 111–124, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3406/quate.1992.1980" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3406/quate.1992.1980</a>, 1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib97"><label>Roberts et al.(2012)Roberts, Paul, White, and Winterbourne</label><mixed-citation>
Roberts, G. G., Paul, J. D., White, N., and Winterbourne, J.:
Temporal and spatial evolution of dynamic support from river profiles: A framework for Madagascar,
Geochem. Geophy. Geosy.,
13, 1–23, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GC004040" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GC004040</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib98"><label>Roering et al.(1999)Roering, Kirchner, and Dietrich</label><mixed-citation>
Roering, J. J., Kirchner, J. W., and Dietrich, W. E.:
Evidence for nonlinear, diffusive sediment transport on hillslopes and implications for landscape morphology,
Water Resour. Res.,
35, 853–870, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1998WR900090" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/1998WR900090</a>, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib99"><label>Roering et al.(2001)Roering, Kirchner, and Dietrich</label><mixed-citation>
Roering, J. J., Kirchner, J. W., and Dietrich, W. E.:
Hillslope evolution by nonlinear, slope-dependent transport: Steady state morphology and equilibrium adjustment timescales,
J. Geophys. Res.,
106, 16499–16513, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JB000323" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JB000323</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib100"><label>Roering et al.(2007)Roering, Perron, and Kirchner</label><mixed-citation>
Roering, J. J., Perron, J. T., and Kirchner, J. W.:
Functional relationships between denudation and hillslope form and relief,
Earth Planet. Sc. Lett.,
264, 245–258, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2007.09.035" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2007.09.035</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib101"><label>Roure et al.(1992)Roure, Brun, Colletta, and Van Den Driessche</label><mixed-citation>
Roure, F., Brun, J.-P., Colletta, B., and Van Den Driessche, J.:
Geometry and kinematics of extensional structures in the alpine foreland basin of southeastern France,
J. Struct. Geol.,
14, 503–519, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8141(92)90153-N" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8141(92)90153-N</a>, 1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib102"><label>Ryan and Cita(1978)</label><mixed-citation>
Ryan, W. B. and Cita, M. B.:
The nature and distribution of Messinian erosional surfaces – Indicators of a several-kilometer-deep Mediterranean in the Miocene,
Mar. Geol.,
27, 193–230, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0025-3227(78)90032-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0025-3227(78)90032-4</a>, 1978.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib103"><label>Scherler et al.(2014)Scherler, Bookhagen, and Strecker</label><mixed-citation>
Scherler, D., Bookhagen, B., and Strecker, M. R.:
Tectonic control on <sup>10</sup>Be derived erosion rates in the Garhwal Himalaya, India,
J. Geophys. Res.-Earth,
119, 1–23, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JF002955" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JF002955</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib104"><label>Schwartz et al.(2017)Schwartz, Gautheron, Audin, Dumont, Nomade, Barbarand, Pinna-Jamme, and van der Beek</label><mixed-citation>
Schwartz, S., Gautheron, C., Audin, L., Dumont, T., Nomade, J., Barbarand, J., Pinna-Jamme, R., and van der Beek, P.:
Foreland exhumation controlled by crustal thickening in the Western Alps,
Geology,
45, 139–142, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1130/G38561.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1130/G38561.1</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib105"><label>Siame et al.(2004)Siame, Bellier, Braucher, Sébrier, Cushing, Bourlès, Hamelin, Baroux, de Voogd, Raisbeck, and Yiou</label><mixed-citation>
Siame, L., Bellier, O., Braucher, R., Sébrier, M., Cushing, M., Bourlès, D., Hamelin, B., Baroux, E., de Voogd, B., Raisbeck, G., and Yiou, F.:
Local erosion rates versus active tectonics: cosmic ray exposure modelling in Provence (south-east France),
Earth Planet. Sc. Lett.,
220, 345–364, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0012-821X(04)00061-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0012-821X(04)00061-5</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib106"><label>Stevenson et al.(2010)Stevenson, Sun, and Mitchell</label><mixed-citation>
Stevenson, J. A., Sun, X., and Mitchell, N. C.:
Despeckling SRTM and other topographic data with a denoising algorithm,
Geomorphology,
114, 238–252, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2009.07.006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2009.07.006</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib107"><label>Sue et al.(1999)Sue, Thouvenot, Fréchet, and Tricart</label><mixed-citation>
Sue, C., Thouvenot, F., Fréchet, J., and Tricart, P.:
Widespread extension in the core of the western Alps revealed by earthquake analysis,
J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea.,
104, 25611–25622, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JB900249" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JB900249</a>, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib108"><label>Sun et al.(2007)Sun, Rosin, Martin, and Langbein</label><mixed-citation>
Sun, X., Rosin, P., Martin, R., and Langbein, F.:
Fast and Effective Feature-Preserving Mesh Denoising,
IEEE T. Vis. Comput. Gr.,
13, 925–938, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2007.1065" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2007.1065</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib109"><label>Thomas et al.(2017)Thomas, Godard, Bellier, Shabanian, Ollivier, Benedetti, Rizza, Espurt, Guillou, Hollender, and Molliex</label><mixed-citation>
Thomas, F., Godard, V., Bellier, O., Shabanian, E., Ollivier, V., Benedetti, L., Rizza, M., Espurt, N., Guillou, V., Hollender, F., and Molliex, S.:
Morphological controls on the dynamics of carbonate landscapes under a mediterranean climate,
Terra Nova,
29, 173–182, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/ter.12260" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/ter.12260</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib110"><label>Thomas et al.(2018)Thomas, Godard, Bellier, Benedetti, Ollivier, Rizza, Guillou, Hollender, Aumaître, Bourlès, and Keddadouche</label><mixed-citation>
Thomas, F., Godard, V., Bellier, O., Benedetti, L., Ollivier, V., Rizza, M., Guillou, V., Hollender, F., Aumaître, G., Bourlès, D. L., and Keddadouche, K.:
Limited influence of climatic gradients on the denudation of a Mediterranean carbonate landscape,
Geomorphology,
316, 44–58, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2018.04.014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2018.04.014</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib111"><label>Tucker and Whipple(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Tucker, G. E. and Whipple, K. X.:
Topographic outcomes predicted by stream erosion models: Sensitivity analysis and intermodel comparison,
J. Geophys. Res.,
107, 2179, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JB000162" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JB000162</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib112"><label>von Blanckenburg(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
von Blanckenburg, F.:
The control mechanisms of erosion and weathering at basin scale from cosmogenic nuclides in river sediment,
Earth Planet. Sc. Lett.,
237, 462–479, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2005.06.030" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2005.06.030</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib113"><label>Walpersdorf et al.(2018)Walpersdorf, Pinget, Vernant, Sue, and Deprez</label><mixed-citation>
Walpersdorf, A., Pinget, L., Vernant, P., Sue, C., and Deprez, A.:
Does Long-Term GPS in the Western Alps Finally Confirm Earthquake Mechanisms?,
Tectonics,
37, 3721–3737, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018TC005054" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018TC005054</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib114"><label>Ward and Valensise(1994)</label><mixed-citation>
Ward, S. N. and Valensise, G.:
The Palos Verdes terraces, California: Bathtub rings from a buried reverse fault,
J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea.,
99, 4485–4494, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/93JB03362" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/93JB03362</a>, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib115"><label>Whipple and Tucker(1999)</label><mixed-citation>
Whipple, K. X. and Tucker, G. E.:
Dynamics of the stream-power river incision model: Implications for height limits of mountain ranges, landscape response timescales, and research needs,
J. Geophys. Res.,
104, 17661–17674, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JB900120" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JB900120</a>, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib116"><label>Whittaker(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Whittaker, A. C.:
How do landscapes record tectonics and climate?,
Lithosphere,
4, 160–164, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1130/RF.L003.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1130/RF.L003.1</a>, 2012.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib117"><label>Wickert and Schildgen(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
Wickert, A. D. and Schildgen, T. F.: Long-profile evolution of transport-limited gravel-bed rivers, Earth Surf. Dynam., 7, 17–3, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-7-17-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-7-17-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib118"><label>Wobus et al.(2006)Wobus, Whipple, Kirby, Snyder, Johnson, Spyropolou, Crosby, and Sheehan</label><mixed-citation>
Wobus, C., Whipple, K. X., Kirby, E., Snyder, N. P., Johnson, J., Spyropolou, K., Crosby, B., and Sheehan, D.:
Tectonics from topography: Procedures, promise, and pitfalls,
Geol. S. Am. S.,
398, 55–74, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1130/0-8137-2398-1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1130/0-8137-2398-1</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib119"><label>Yanites et al.(2009)Yanites, Tucker, and Anderson</label><mixed-citation>
Yanites, B. J., Tucker, G. E., and Anderson, R. S.:
Numerical and analytical models of cosmogenic radionuclide dynamics in landslide-dominated drainage basins,
J. Geophys. Res.,
114, F01007, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JF001088" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JF001088</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
