the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Short communication: Potential of Sentinel 1 InSAR and offset tracking in monitoring post-cyclonic landslides activities in Reunion Island
Marcello Michele
Daniel Raucoules
Claire Rault
Bertrand Aunay
Michael Foumelis
Abstract. This study examined the results of an interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) and SAR Offset Tracking (OT) study on Cirque de Salazie (CdS), Reunion Island, France, within the context of the RENOVRISK project, a multidisciplinary programme to study the cyclonic risks in the South-West Indian Ocean. CdS is one of the denser populated areas in Reunion Island. One of the aims of the project was to assess whether Sentinel 1 SAR methods could be used to measure landslide motion and/or accelerations due to post cyclonic activity on CdS. We concentrated on the post 2017 cyclonic event. We used the Copernicus Sentinel 1 data, acquired between 30/10/2017 and 06/11 2018. Sentinel 1 is a C-band SAR, and its signal can be severely affected by the presence of changing vegetation between two SAR acquisitions, particularly in CdS, where the vegetation canopy is well developed. This is why C-band radars such as the ones onboard Radarsat or Envisat, characterized by low acquisition frequency (24 and 36 days, respectively), could not be routinely used on CdS to measure landslide motion with InSAR in the past. In this study, we used InSAR and OT techniques applied to Sentinel 1 SAR. We find that C-band SAR onboard Sentinel 1 can be used to monitor landslide motion in densely vegetated areas, thanks to its high acquisition frequency (12 days). OT stacking reveals a useful complement to InSAR, especially in mapping fast moving areas. In particular, we can highlight ground motion in the Hell-Bourg, Ile à Vidot, Grand Ilet, Camp Pierrot, and Bellier landslides.
Marcello de Michele et al.
Status: final response (author comments only)
-
RC1: 'Comment on esurf-2022-60', Anonymous Referee #1, 09 Jan 2023
The present short communication deal with the combine use interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) and Offset Tracking (OT) processing techniques od SAR images to investigate the landslide motion and/or accelerations due to post cyclonic activity. The analysis was performed within a multidisciplinary research project (called RENOVRISK) over a vegetated area of the Cirque de Salazie (Reunion Island, France) using Sentinel-1 SAR data. The main novelty of the study is the jointly use of both InSAR and OT processing method that , applied to C-band SAR images with high acquisition frequency (12 days for Sentinel constellation), can be used to monitor slow-moving landslide motion also densely vegetated areas (generally bed covered) as well to identify and mapping fast moving areas. The paper is interesting for people involved in the mapping of new moving areas and in the kinematic characterization of mapped landslide areas. The designed research fits well with the purpose of the Journal with results that are encouraging which show a promising use of the combined proposed approach to detect moving area in high vegetated condition. From my point of view the paper can be considered for the publication in the present form.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-2022-60-RC1 -
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Marcello de Michele, 09 Feb 2023
We thank Reviewer #1 for the time he spent to evaluate our work. We highly appreciate his positive and encouraging review of our work.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-2022-60-AC1
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Marcello de Michele, 09 Feb 2023
-
RC2: 'Comment on esurf-2022-60', Anonymous Referee #2, 10 Jan 2023
The letter proposes the use of InSAR and offset tracking techniques on Sentinel-1 SAR data to monitor landslides in a vegetated area (Reunion Island). The work is interesting and suitable for publication in this journal, in the following detailed comments are provided.
- As a general point, the quality of the figures should be improved, as they appear blurred.
- Page 6, the authors state that “The OT technique is nominally less affected by temporal signal decorrelation than the InSAR technique. Therefore, we used all possible image couples, leading to the creation of 351 correlograms in both range and azimuth directions. Then, we applied a stacking procedure to create one velocity map in the range direction and one in the azimuth direction.” Is the matching identical for all couples? In other words, how is it ensured that the same points are identified for all image couples? And how are the offset values related to the matching point couples combined into one velocity map? A more detailed description of the algorithm should be provided.
- Page 7. “Second, we can see a clear pattern of ground motion in the Hell-Bourg area, approximately ± 0.5 m/yr and spatially consistent with ground observations.”. The pattern of the Hell-Bourg area looks also quite complex and stating that it is “± 0.5 m/yr” may induce the reader that values are either +0.5 or -0.5 m/yr. It should be specified that ± 0.5 m/yr is the interval of values.
- Page 7. “In this study, the InSAR signal was surprisingly coherent with a certain level of noise.”. This is an interesting result, but should be justified by showing the InSAR coherence map.
- The azimuth and LOS OT velocity maps are shown in Figure 3. These maps have a uniform spatial sampling. However, the image matching techniques usually yield a non-uniform grid. Is this true also in this case? If so, was the spatial grid interpolated?
- The notation in equation (1) is not very clear and should be improved using symbols. This applies also to Figure 4.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-2022-60-RC2 -
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Marcello de Michele, 09 Feb 2023
We are thankful to Reviewer #2 for the time he spent to evaluate our work. We do appreciate his positive suggestions to improve our work.
We took into account all the comments and we improved the manuscript accordingly. We also performed miscellaneous editing in the new version of the manuscript. In the pdf file attached, we reply to the all the suggestions for improvement made by Reviewer 2. Our reply are in bold typography. We hope that the new, improved version of the manuscript is suitable for pubblication in ESURF.
Marcello de Michele et al.
Marcello de Michele et al.
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
356 | 88 | 16 | 460 | 4 | 4 |
- HTML: 356
- PDF: 88
- XML: 16
- Total: 460
- BibTeX: 4
- EndNote: 4
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1