Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/esurfd-2-215-2014
https://doi.org/10.5194/esurfd-2-215-2014
07 Apr 2014
 | 07 Apr 2014
Status: this preprint was under review for the journal ESurf. A revision for further review has not been submitted.

The effect of ripple types on cross-shore suspended sediment flux

S. R. Kularatne, J. Doucette, and C. B. Pattiaratchi

Abstract. Field measurements, collected at several low energy, microtidal beaches in south-western Australia were used to study the cross-shore transport and sediment resuspension over different sand ripple types. The measurements included simultaneous records of the water surface elevation, cross-shore current velocity, and suspended sediment concentration, as well as free diver measurements of the ripple dimensions. The observed ripples were classified according to their geometry and sediment suspension patterns into six categories: flat bed, post-vortex ripples, two-dimensional (2-D) ripples, two/three-dimensional (2-D/3-D) ripples, three-dimensional (3-D) ripples, and cross ripples. Flat bed conditions were observed under the highest flow mobility numbers. Post-vortex ripples were observed under slightly lower mobility numbers. The other ripple types occurred under low mobility numbers, with no significant difference in the mobility number among them. Two-dimensional ripples were observed more than the other ripple types in the presence of coarse grains. The suspended sediment concentration at ∼0.05 m above the bed was greater over steep ripples. The net cross-shore suspended sediment flux close to the seabed (at ∼0.05 m) in the swell frequency band varied over the different ripples types: onshore over a flat bed, offshore over post-vortex ripples, onshore over 2-D and 2-D/3-D ripples, and offshore over 3-D ripples. The suspended sediment flux direction over the cross ripples varied between onshore and offshore.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
S. R. Kularatne, J. Doucette, and C. B. Pattiaratchi
 
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
 
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
S. R. Kularatne, J. Doucette, and C. B. Pattiaratchi
S. R. Kularatne, J. Doucette, and C. B. Pattiaratchi

Viewed

Total article views: 1,809 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,257 438 114 1,809 127 104
  • HTML: 1,257
  • PDF: 438
  • XML: 114
  • Total: 1,809
  • BibTeX: 127
  • EndNote: 104
Views and downloads (calculated since 07 Apr 2014)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 07 Apr 2014)

Saved

Latest update: 18 May 2024