Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-2019-57
https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-2019-57
24 Oct 2019
 | 24 Oct 2019
Status: this preprint has been withdrawn by the authors.

Modelling Bedrock Topography

Nils-Otto Kitterød and Étienne Leblois

Abstract. The access to digital information from remote sensing; geological mapping; and public databases give an opportunity to express the surface of the bedrock as a mathematical estimation problem. We modelled the bedrock topography as a stochastic function in space. The function is given with high precision in areas where the bedrock is exposed to the surface, but unknown in areas covered by sediments except for a limited number of point information (viz boreholes; wells; geotechnical surveys). Two different approaches were evaluated to reveal the local trend of the bedrock surface: Firstly, we applied the statistical relation between the horizontal distance (L) to the nearest bedrock outcrop and the observed sediment depth (D) in boreholes. The relation between D and L was applied in ordinary kriging and cokriging to include the local trend in the estimation. Secondly, we applied inverse modelling of the Poisson's equation to model the local trend. After minimizing the difference between the point observations and the parabolic surface from the Poisson's equation, we did ordinary kriging of the residuals between the optimal parabolic function and the observations. These approaches were tested against observations from a test site. Estimates derived from the Poisson's equation gave a lowest mean absolute error for cross-validation by leaving one observation out. Ordinary kriging gave a least mean absolute error when an independent dataset was used for cross-validation. The results show that the extreme large soil depths were better reproduced if the local trend was included in the estimation procedure.

This preprint has been withdrawn.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
Nils-Otto Kitterød and Étienne Leblois

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
Nils-Otto Kitterød and Étienne Leblois
Nils-Otto Kitterød and Étienne Leblois

Viewed

Total article views: 1,208 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
728 401 79 1,208 110 104
  • HTML: 728
  • PDF: 401
  • XML: 79
  • Total: 1,208
  • BibTeX: 110
  • EndNote: 104
Views and downloads (calculated since 24 Oct 2019)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 24 Oct 2019)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,106 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,101 with geography defined and 5 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 20 Nov 2024
Download

This preprint has been withdrawn.

Short summary
In areas covered by sediments, the unknown bedrock surface can be expressed as a mathematical function in space. We used sparse point information of the vertical depth to the bedrock surface together with general digital information (viz digital elevation maps; geological maps) to minimize the estimation uncertainties. Based on local geology, we used the relation between horizontal distance to the nearest bedrock outcrop as a secondary information to minimize the estimation uncertainties.