Articles | Volume 12, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-12-765-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-12-765-2024
Research article
 | 
17 May 2024
Research article |  | 17 May 2024

Evaluating the accuracy of binary classifiers for geomorphic applications

Matthew William Rossi

Viewed

Total article views: 3,103 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
2,294 701 108 3,103 139 177
  • HTML: 2,294
  • PDF: 701
  • XML: 108
  • Total: 3,103
  • BibTeX: 139
  • EndNote: 177
Views and downloads (calculated since 02 Nov 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 02 Nov 2022)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 3,103 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,984 with geography defined and 119 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Saved (final revised paper)

Latest update: 13 Jun 2026
Download
Short summary
Accurately identifying the presence and absence of landforms is important to inferring processes and testing numerical models of landscape evolution. Using synthetic scenarios, I show that the Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) should be favored over the F1 score when comparing accuracy across scenes where landform abundances vary. Despite the resilience of MCC to imbalanced data, strong sensitivity to the size and shape of features can still occur when truth and model data are misaligned.
Share