Articles | Volume 5, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-5-807-2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-5-807-2017
Research article
 | 
06 Dec 2017
Research article |  | 06 Dec 2017

Landscape evolution models using the stream power incision model show unrealistic behavior when m ∕ n equals 0.5

Jeffrey S. Kwang and Gary Parker

Viewed

Total article views: 4,023 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
2,343 1,521 159 4,023 134 134
  • HTML: 2,343
  • PDF: 1,521
  • XML: 159
  • Total: 4,023
  • BibTeX: 134
  • EndNote: 134
Views and downloads (calculated since 20 Mar 2017)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 20 Mar 2017)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 4,023 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 3,877 with geography defined and 146 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 14 Dec 2024
Download
Short summary
A prevalent bedrock incision relation used in landscape evolution is the stream power incision model (SPIM), which relates incision rate to drainage area to the m power and slope to the n power. We show the most commonly used ratio, m ∕ n = 0.5, leads to scale invariance: a landscape that has a horizontal domain of 1 km × 1 km has exactly the same relief pattern as one with a 100 km × 100 km domain. This conclusion indicates that SPIM must yield unrealistic results over a wide range of conditions.