Articles | Volume 6, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-6-505-2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-6-505-2018
Research article
 | 
22 Jun 2018
Research article |  | 22 Jun 2018

How concave are river channels?

Simon M. Mudd, Fiona J. Clubb, Boris Gailleton, and Martin D. Hurst

Viewed

Total article views: 11,159 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
7,314 3,515 330 11,159 665 299 337
  • HTML: 7,314
  • PDF: 3,515
  • XML: 330
  • Total: 11,159
  • Supplement: 665
  • BibTeX: 299
  • EndNote: 337
Views and downloads (calculated since 05 Feb 2018)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 05 Feb 2018)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 11,159 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 10,479 with geography defined and 680 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Saved (final revised paper)

Latest update: 10 Nov 2026
Download
Short summary
Rivers can reveal information about erosion rates, tectonics, and climate. In order to make meaningful inferences about these influences, one must be able to compare headwaters to downstream parts of the river network. We describe new methods for normalizing river steepness for drainage area to better understand how rivers record erosion rates in eroding landscapes.
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint