Articles | Volume 6, issue 2
Earth Surf. Dynam., 6, 505–523, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-6-505-2018
Earth Surf. Dynam., 6, 505–523, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-6-505-2018

Research article 22 Jun 2018

Research article | 22 Jun 2018

How concave are river channels?

Simon M. Mudd et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 4,522 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
2,768 1,647 107 4,522 236 59 63
  • HTML: 2,768
  • PDF: 1,647
  • XML: 107
  • Total: 4,522
  • Supplement: 236
  • BibTeX: 59
  • EndNote: 63
Views and downloads (calculated since 05 Feb 2018)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 05 Feb 2018)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 4,131 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 4,100 with geography defined and 31 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Discussed (final revised paper)

Latest update: 06 Dec 2021
Download
Short summary
Rivers can reveal information about erosion rates, tectonics, and climate. In order to make meaningful inferences about these influences, one must be able to compare headwaters to downstream parts of the river network. We describe new methods for normalizing river steepness for drainage area to better understand how rivers record erosion rates in eroding landscapes.