Earth Surface Dynamics
Earth Surface Dynamics
ESurf
Articles | Volume 7, issue 1
Articles | Volume 7, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-7-275-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-7-275-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 7, issue 1
Research article
 | 
14 Mar 2019
Research article |  | 14 Mar 2019

How steady are steady-state mountain belts? A reexamination of the Olympic Mountains (Washington state, USA)

Lorenz Michel, Christoph Glotzbach, Sarah Falkowski, Byron A. Adams, and Todd A. Ehlers

Viewed

Total article views: 3,572 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
2,347 971 254 3,572 410 108 108
  • HTML: 2,347
  • PDF: 971
  • XML: 254
  • Total: 3,572
  • Supplement: 410
  • BibTeX: 108
  • EndNote: 108
Views and downloads (calculated since 03 Sep 2018)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 03 Sep 2018)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 3,572 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 3,317 with geography defined and 255 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 29 May 2025
Download
Short summary
Mountain-building processes are often investigated by assuming a steady state, meaning the balance between opposing forces, like mass influx and mass outflux. This work shows that the Olympic Mountains are in flux steady state on long timescales (i.e., 14 Myr), but the flux steady state could be disturbed on shorter timescales, especially by the Plio–Pleistocene glaciation. The contribution highlights the temporally nonsteady evolution of mountain ranges.
Read more
Share