the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Determination limits for cosmogenic 10Be and their importance for geomorphic applications
Abstract. When using cosmogenic nuclides to determine exposure ages or denudation rates in rapidly evolving landscapes, challenges arise related to the small number of nuclides that have accumulated in surface materials. Improvements in accelerator mass spectrometry have enabled analysis of samples with low 10Be content (< 105 atoms), such that it is timely to discuss how technical limits of nuclide determination, effects of laboratory cleanliness, and overall sample preparation quality affect lower blank limits. Here we describe an approach that defines a lower threshold above which samples with low 10Be content can be statistically distinguished from laboratory blanks. In general, this threshold depends on the chosen confidence interval. In detail, however, we show that depending on which ensemble of blank values and which approach is chosen for the calculation of this threshold, significant differences can arise with respect to when a sample can be distinguished from a blank. This in turn dictates whether the sample can be used to determine an exposure age or a denudation rate, or when it only constrains a maximum age or a minimum denudation rate. Based on a dataset of 57 samples and 61 blank measurements obtained in one laboratory, we demonstrate how these different approaches may influence the interpretation of the data.
This preprint has been withdrawn.
-
Withdrawal notice
This preprint has been withdrawn.
-
Preprint
(890 KB)
-
Supplement
(694 KB)
-
This preprint has been withdrawn.
- Preprint
(890 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(694 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Interactive discussion
-
RC1: 'review of Savi et al.', Anonymous Referee #1, 20 Jun 2017
-
AC1: 'Answer to Anonymous Referee #1', Sara Savi, 29 Jun 2017
-
RC3: 'response to review responses', Anonymous Referee #1, 30 Jun 2017
- AC3: 'Authors' response to referee#1', Sara Savi, 28 Jul 2017
-
RC3: 'response to review responses', Anonymous Referee #1, 30 Jun 2017
-
AC1: 'Answer to Anonymous Referee #1', Sara Savi, 29 Jun 2017
-
RC2: 'Review Savi et al.', Anonymous Referee #2, 21 Jun 2017
- AC2: 'Answer to Anonymous Referee #2', Sara Savi, 29 Jun 2017
- SC1: 'Authors' response to referee#2', Sara Savi, 28 Jul 2017
-
AC4: 'Manuscript with changes for referees' revision', Sara Savi, 28 Jul 2017
- RC4: 'response to revised ms', Anonymous Referee #1, 28 Jul 2017
-
RC5: 'Reviewer Comment on Savi et al., determination limits for 10Be', Darryl Granger, 28 Jul 2017
- SC2: 'Short comment on D. Granger's review', Sara Savi, 09 Aug 2017
Interactive discussion
-
RC1: 'review of Savi et al.', Anonymous Referee #1, 20 Jun 2017
-
AC1: 'Answer to Anonymous Referee #1', Sara Savi, 29 Jun 2017
-
RC3: 'response to review responses', Anonymous Referee #1, 30 Jun 2017
- AC3: 'Authors' response to referee#1', Sara Savi, 28 Jul 2017
-
RC3: 'response to review responses', Anonymous Referee #1, 30 Jun 2017
-
AC1: 'Answer to Anonymous Referee #1', Sara Savi, 29 Jun 2017
-
RC2: 'Review Savi et al.', Anonymous Referee #2, 21 Jun 2017
- AC2: 'Answer to Anonymous Referee #2', Sara Savi, 29 Jun 2017
- SC1: 'Authors' response to referee#2', Sara Savi, 28 Jul 2017
-
AC4: 'Manuscript with changes for referees' revision', Sara Savi, 28 Jul 2017
- RC4: 'response to revised ms', Anonymous Referee #1, 28 Jul 2017
-
RC5: 'Reviewer Comment on Savi et al., determination limits for 10Be', Darryl Granger, 28 Jul 2017
- SC2: 'Short comment on D. Granger's review', Sara Savi, 09 Aug 2017
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1,451 | 601 | 121 | 2,173 | 345 | 129 | 152 |
- HTML: 1,451
- PDF: 601
- XML: 121
- Total: 2,173
- Supplement: 345
- BibTeX: 129
- EndNote: 152
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
Cited
Sara Savi
Stefanie Tofelde
Hella Wittmann
Fabiana Castino
Taylor Schildgen
This preprint has been withdrawn.
- Preprint
(890 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(694 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote