Earth Surface Dynamics
Earth Surface Dynamics
ESurf
Articles | Volume 12, issue 6
Articles | Volume 12, issue 6
https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-12-1227-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-12-1227-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 12, issue 6
Short communication
 | 
04 Nov 2024
Short communication |  | 04 Nov 2024

Short Communication: Numerically simulated time to steady state is not a reliable measure of landscape response time

Nicole M. Gasparini, Adam M. Forte, and Katherine R. Barnhart

Viewed

Total article views: 2,078 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,397 443 238 2,078 86 84
  • HTML: 1,397
  • PDF: 443
  • XML: 238
  • Total: 2,078
  • BibTeX: 86
  • EndNote: 84
Views and downloads (calculated since 31 May 2023)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 31 May 2023)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 2,078 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,056 with geography defined and 22 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 06 Jun 2025
Download
Short summary
The time it takes for a landscape to adjust to new environmental conditions is critical for understanding the impacts of past and future environmental changes. We used different computational models and methods and found that predicted times for a landscape to reach a stable condition vary greatly. Our results illustrate that reporting how timescales are measured is important. Modelers should ensure that the measurement technique addresses the question.
Read more
Share