Articles | Volume 12, issue 6
https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-12-1227-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-12-1227-2024
Short communication
 | 
04 Nov 2024
Short communication |  | 04 Nov 2024

Short Communication: Numerically simulated time to steady state is not a reliable measure of landscape response time

Nicole M. Gasparini, Adam M. Forte, and Katherine R. Barnhart

Viewed

Total article views: 1,898 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,321 418 159 1,898 71 61
  • HTML: 1,321
  • PDF: 418
  • XML: 159
  • Total: 1,898
  • BibTeX: 71
  • EndNote: 61
Views and downloads (calculated since 31 May 2023)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 31 May 2023)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,898 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,873 with geography defined and 25 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 18 Apr 2025
Download
Short summary
The time it takes for a landscape to adjust to new environmental conditions is critical for understanding the impacts of past and future environmental changes. We used different computational models and methods and found that predicted times for a landscape to reach a stable condition vary greatly. Our results illustrate that reporting how timescales are measured is important. Modelers should ensure that the measurement technique addresses the question.
Share