Articles | Volume 14, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-14-95-2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-14-95-2026
Research article
 | Highlight paper
 | 
05 Feb 2026
Research article | Highlight paper |  | 05 Feb 2026

Investigating controls on fluvial grain sizes in post-glacial landscapes using citizen science

Anya H. Towers, Mikael Attal, Simon M. Mudd, and Fiona J. Clubb

Model code and software

LSDtopotools/LSDTopoTools2: LSDTopoTools2 v0.8 (v0.8) S. M. Mudd et al. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7892465

PebbleCounts: a Python grain-sizing algorithm for gravel-bed river imagery. V. 1.0 B. Purinton and B. Bookhagen https://doi.org/10.5880/fidgeo.2019.007

Download
Editor
How does grainsize vary along rivers, and what are the controls? Based on an extensive dataset compiled in a citizen-science survey across Scotland, Towers et al. find that in post-glacial landscapes commonly used global environmental factors provide little explanation. Instead, the local sediment input from glacially sculpted landforms and emplaced deposits largely determine the high spatial variability of grainsizes.
Short summary
We explore controls on channel sediment characteristics in post-glacial landscapes. In contrast to other studies that have focused on landscapes with little glacial influence, we find no apparent controls. We propose that Scotland's post-glacial legacy drives the lack of sedimentological trends, and that changes in landscape morphology and sediment sources caused by glacial processes lead to a decoupling between fluvial sediment grain size and environmental variables.
Share