Journal cover Journal topic
Earth Surface Dynamics An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 3.928 IF 3.928
  • IF 5-year value: 3.864 IF 5-year
    3.864
  • CiteScore value: 6.2 CiteScore
    6.2
  • SNIP value: 1.469 SNIP 1.469
  • IPP value: 4.21 IPP 4.21
  • SJR value: 1.666 SJR 1.666
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 21 Scimago H
    index 21
  • h5-index value: 23 h5-index 23
Volume 5, issue 3
Earth Surf. Dynam., 5, 347–367, 2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-5-347-2017
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Special issue: 4-D reconstruction of earth surface processes: multi-temporal...

Earth Surf. Dynam., 5, 347–367, 2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-5-347-2017
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Research article 06 Jul 2017

Research article | 06 Jul 2017

Quantifying uncertainty in high-resolution remotely sensed topographic surveys for ephemeral gully channel monitoring

Robert R. Wells et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 1,792 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
964 745 83 1,792 80 91
  • HTML: 964
  • PDF: 745
  • XML: 83
  • Total: 1,792
  • BibTeX: 80
  • EndNote: 91
Views and downloads (calculated since 20 Jan 2017)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 20 Jan 2017)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,782 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,772 with geography defined and 10 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Saved (final revised paper)

No saved metrics found.

Saved (preprint)

No saved metrics found.

Discussed (final revised paper)

No discussed metrics found.

Discussed (preprint)

No discussed metrics found.
Latest update: 30 Oct 2020
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
As technology presents a gateway to finer-resolution survey information, caution must be exercised in the evaluation of alignment error and subsequent morphological determinations. Three survey technologies were evaluated: ground-based photogrammetry, unmanned aerial vehicle photogrammetry, and ground-based lidar. Initial project planning necessitates the effective use of ground control to facilitate alignment and proper morphological conclusions.
As technology presents a gateway to finer-resolution survey information, caution must be...
Citation