Articles | Volume 7, issue 1
Earth Surf. Dynam., 7, 1–16, 2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-7-1-2019

Special issue: From process to signal – advancing environmental...

Earth Surf. Dynam., 7, 1–16, 2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-7-1-2019

Research article 10 Jan 2019

Research article | 10 Jan 2019

Potentials and pitfalls of permafrost active layer monitoring using the HVSR method: a case study in Svalbard

Andreas Köhler and Christian Weidle

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
AR by Andreas Köhler on behalf of the Authors (28 Sep 2018)  Author's response    Manuscript
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (10 Oct 2018) by Fabian Walter
RR by Lukas Preiswerk (12 Oct 2018)
RR by Anonymous Referee #2 (20 Nov 2018)
ED: Reconsider after major revisions (23 Nov 2018) by Fabian Walter
AR by Andreas Köhler on behalf of the Authors (27 Nov 2018)  Author's response    Manuscript
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (05 Dec 2018) by Fabian Walter
RR by Anonymous Referee #2 (10 Dec 2018)
ED: Publish as is (10 Dec 2018) by Fabian Walter
ED: Publish as is (15 Dec 2018) by Niels Hovius(Editor)
Download
Short summary
The uppermost part of permanently frozen ground can thaw during summer and refreeze during winter. We use a method based on naturally generated seismic waves to continuously monitor these changes close to the research settlement of Ny-Ålesund in Svalbard between April and August 2016. Our results reveal some potential pitfalls when interpreting temporal variations in the data. However, we show that a careful data analysis makes this method a very useful tool for long-term permafrost monitoring.