Articles | Volume 10, issue 6
https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-10-1165-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-10-1165-2022
Research article
 | 
16 Nov 2022
Research article |  | 16 Nov 2022

Comparison of calibration characteristics of different acoustic impact systems for measuring bedload transport in mountain streams

Dieter Rickenmann, Lorenz Ammann, Tobias Nicollier, Stefan Boss, Bruno Fritschi, Gilles Antoniazza, Nicolas Steeb, Zheng Chen, Carlos Wyss, and Alexandre Badoux

Viewed

Total article views: 1,512 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
1,125 341 46 1,512 118 32 35
  • HTML: 1,125
  • PDF: 341
  • XML: 46
  • Total: 1,512
  • Supplement: 118
  • BibTeX: 32
  • EndNote: 35
Views and downloads (calculated since 20 Jul 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 20 Jul 2022)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,512 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,436 with geography defined and 76 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 29 Jun 2024
Download
Short summary
The Swiss plate geophone system has been installed and tested in more than 20 steep gravel-bed streams. It is an indirect bedload transport measuring system. We compare the performance of this system with three alternative surrogate measuring systems, using calibration measurements with direct bedload samples from three field sites and an outdoor flume facility. Three of the four systems resulted in robust calibration relations between signal impulse counts and transported bedload mass.