Articles | Volume 5, issue 4
Earth Surf. Dynam., 5, 653–668, 2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-5-653-2017

Special issue: 4-D reconstruction of earth surface processes: multi-temporal...

Earth Surf. Dynam., 5, 653–668, 2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-5-653-2017

Research article 16 Oct 2017

Research article | 16 Oct 2017

Seismic monitoring of small alpine rockfalls – validity, precision and limitations

Michael Dietze et al.

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
AR by Michael Dietze on behalf of the Authors (13 Jul 2017)  Author's response    Manuscript
ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (review by Editor) (31 Aug 2017) by Carlos Castillo
AR by Michael Dietze on behalf of the Authors (07 Sep 2017)  Author's response    Manuscript
ED: Publish as is (12 Sep 2017) by Carlos Castillo
ED: Publish as is (12 Sep 2017) by Douglas Jerolmack(Editor)
Download
Short summary
We use a seismometer network to detect and locate rockfalls, a key process shaping steep mountain landscapes. When tested against laser scan surveys, all seismically detected events could be located with an average deviation of 81 m. Seismic monitoring provides insight to the dynamics of individual rockfalls, which can be as small as 0.0053 m3. Thus, seismic methods provide unprecedented temporal, spatial and kinematic details about this important process.