Articles | Volume 5, issue 4
Earth Surf. Dynam., 5, 653–668, 2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-5-653-2017

Special issue: 4-D reconstruction of earth surface processes: multi-temporal...

Earth Surf. Dynam., 5, 653–668, 2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-5-653-2017

Research article 16 Oct 2017

Research article | 16 Oct 2017

Seismic monitoring of small alpine rockfalls – validity, precision and limitations

Michael Dietze et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 4,930 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
3,288 1,472 170 4,930 259 90 129
  • HTML: 3,288
  • PDF: 1,472
  • XML: 170
  • Total: 4,930
  • Supplement: 259
  • BibTeX: 90
  • EndNote: 129
Views and downloads (calculated since 16 Mar 2017)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 16 Mar 2017)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 4,582 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 4,566 with geography defined and 16 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 07 Dec 2021
Download
Short summary
We use a seismometer network to detect and locate rockfalls, a key process shaping steep mountain landscapes. When tested against laser scan surveys, all seismically detected events could be located with an average deviation of 81 m. Seismic monitoring provides insight to the dynamics of individual rockfalls, which can be as small as 0.0053 m3. Thus, seismic methods provide unprecedented temporal, spatial and kinematic details about this important process.