Earth Surface Dynamics
Earth Surface Dynamics
ESurf
Articles | Volume 7, issue 2
Articles | Volume 7, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-7-475-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-7-475-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 7, issue 2
Research article
 | 
29 May 2019
Research article |  | 29 May 2019

Determining the optimal grid resolution for topographic analysis on an airborne lidar dataset

Taylor Smith, Aljoscha Rheinwalt, and Bodo Bookhagen

Viewed

Total article views: 3,974 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
2,618 1,257 99 3,974 384 94 89
  • HTML: 2,618
  • PDF: 1,257
  • XML: 99
  • Total: 3,974
  • Supplement: 384
  • BibTeX: 94
  • EndNote: 89
Views and downloads (calculated since 02 Jan 2019)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 02 Jan 2019)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 3,974 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 3,332 with geography defined and 642 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 20 Nov 2024
Download
Short summary
Representing the surface of the Earth on an equally spaced grid leads to errors and uncertainties in derived slope and aspect. Using synthetic data, we develop a quality metric that can be used to compare the uncertainties in different datasets. We then apply this method to a real-world lidar dataset, and find that 1 m data have larger error bounds than lower-resolution data. The highest data resolution is not always the best choice – it is important to consider the quality of the data.
Read more