32 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Drainage divide migration in response to strike-slip faulting: An example from northern Longmen Shan, eastern Tibet X. Zeng & X. Tan https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2023.229720
2. Drainage divide networks – Part 1: Identification and ordering in digital elevation models D. Scherler & W. Schwanghart https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-8-245-2020
3. Impact of asymmetric uplift on mountain asymmetry: Analytical solution, numerical modeling, and natural examples F. Shi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2021.107862
4. Stream channel offsets along strike-slip faults: Interaction between fault slip and surface processes Y. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2021.107965
5. Late Quaternary Drainage Rearrangement Prevents the Vegetation Development in the La Tatacoa Intermontane Basin of the Colombian Andes D. Souza et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2022.808718
6. Plan‐Form Evolution of Drainage Basins in Response to Tectonic Changes: Insights From Experimental and Numerical Landscapes K. Habousha et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JF006876
7. Quantitative analysis of hillshed geomorphology and critical zone function: Raising the hillshed to watershed status Z. Brecheisen et al. https://doi.org/10.1130/B35724.1
8. The southeast Brazilian rifted continental margin is not a single, continuous upwarp: Variations in morphology and denudation patterns along the continental drainage divide T. Fonte-Boa et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2022.104091
9. Landscape responses to differential rock uplift in the Phetchabun Mountain ranges and basin, Central Thailand: Insights from morphometric indices P. Manopkawee & T. Wongthibet https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2025.110110
10. How erosional efficiency modulates landscape response to drainage reorganization: New empirical evidence from the Andes H. García-Delgado et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2023.108893
11. Cross‐divide difference in channel‐head steady‐state elevation controls drainage‐divide migration Y. Ye et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.5892
12. How does the newly-formed drainage divide migrate after a river capture event? S. Bian et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2024.119165
13. Neogene variations in slab geometry drive topographic change and drainage reorganization in the Northern Andes of Colombia N. Pérez-Consuegra et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2021.103641
14. Quantifying the migration rate of drainage divides from high-resolution topographic data C. Zhou et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-12-433-2024
15. Analysis of Medicine Bow-Laramie River Drainage Divide Using Topographic Map Interpretation Techniques, Southeastern Wyoming, USA E. Clausen https://doi.org/10.4236/ojg.2020.107033
16. Evolution of tectonic landscapes and deformation in the southeast Kumaun and western Nepal Himalaya K. Luirei et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-023-8433-7
17. Elusive active faults in a low strain rate region (Sicily, Italy): Hints from a multidisciplinary land-to-sea approach N. Parrino et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2022.229520
18. A cross-divide contrast index (C) for assessing controls on the main drainage divide stability of a mountain belt C. Zhou et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2021.108071
19. Bedload‐Bedrock Contrasts Form Enigmatic Low‐Relief Surfaces of the Pyrenees M. Fox et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL101995
20. Quantifying the influence of asymmetric uplift, base level elevation, and erodibility on cross-divide χ difference C. Zhou & X. Tan https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2023.108634
21. Mobility of South America’s transcontinental drainage divide and shrinkage of the Paraná river basin linked to lithologic and geodynamic controls C. Crelier et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-87470-1
22. Topographic Characteristics of Drainage Divides at the Mountain-Range Scale—A Review of DTM-Based Analytical Tools K. Jancewicz et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi11020116
23. Formation of Longitudinal River Valleys and the Fixing of Drainage Divides in Response to Exhumation of Crystalline Basement T. Bernard et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL092210
24. Ongoing westward migration of drainage divides in eastern Tibet, quantified from topographic analysis C. Zhou et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2022.108123
25. Channel concavity controls planform complexity of branching drainage networks L. Goren & E. Shelef https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-12-1347-2024
26. Temporal and Spatial Variations in Rock Uplift From River‐Profile Inversions at the Central Anatolian Plateau Southern Margin S. Racano et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JF006027
27. Structural controls and dysconnectivity in a semi‐arid watershed: A case study from northeastern Brazil B. de Azevedo Cavalcanti Tavares et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-5871.12687
28. Eastward drainage-divide migrations driven by the spatial variations in precipitation and tectonic uplift contribute to the formation of the Parallel Rivers in the Hengduan Mountains, Southeastern Tibet F. Gao et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2024.109513
29. Initial topography matters in drainage divide migration analysis: Insights from numerical simulations and natural examples Y. Ye et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2022.108266
30. Transient and relict landforms in a lithologically heterogeneous post-orogenic landscape in the intertropical belt (Alto Paranaíba region, Brazil) K. Marques et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2021.107892
31. Dynamic Divide Migration as a Response to Asymmetric Uplift: An Example from the Zhongtiao Shan, North China Q. Su et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12244188
32. Dynamics of the Hron River drainage divide (Western Carpathians): From regional drivers to local controls R. Prokešová & J. Novotný https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2025.110077