Articles | Volume 9, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-9-123-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
How do modeling choices and erosion zone locations impact the representation of connectivity and the dynamics of suspended sediments in a multi-source soil erosion model?
Download
- Final revised paper (published on 03 Mar 2021)
- Preprint (discussion started on 31 Aug 2020)
Interactive discussion
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
-
RC1: 'Review of Uber et al., "How do modeling choices impact the representation of structural connectivity and the dynamics of suspended sediment fluxes in distributed soil erosion models?"', Anonymous Referee #1, 26 Oct 2020
-
AC1: 'Answer to referee #1', Cédric Legoût, 02 Dec 2020
-
AC1: 'Answer to referee #1', Cédric Legoût, 02 Dec 2020
-
EC1: 'short comment on Uber et al', Greg Hancock, 30 Nov 2020
-
AC2: 'Answer to editor', Cédric Legoût, 16 Dec 2020
-
AC2: 'Answer to editor', Cédric Legoût, 16 Dec 2020
-
SC1: 'The way forward by combined hydrology-sediment modelling', Peter Molnar, 05 Dec 2020
-
AC3: 'Reply on SC1', Cédric Legoût, 11 Jan 2021
-
AC3: 'Reply on SC1', Cédric Legoût, 11 Jan 2021
Peer-review completion
AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
AR by Cédric Legoût on behalf of the Authors (11 Jan 2021)
Author's response
Manuscript
ED: Publish as is (13 Jan 2021) by Greg Hancock
ED: Publish as is (15 Jan 2021) by Tom Coulthard (Editor)
AR by Cédric Legoût on behalf of the Authors (20 Jan 2021)