Articles | Volume 9, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-9-123-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.How do modeling choices and erosion zone locations impact the representation of connectivity and the dynamics of suspended sediments in a multi-source soil erosion model?
Download
- Final revised paper (published on 03 Mar 2021)
- Preprint (discussion started on 31 Aug 2020)
Interactive discussion
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
- Printer-friendly version
- Supplement
-
RC1: 'Review of Uber et al., "How do modeling choices impact the representation of structural connectivity and the dynamics of suspended sediment fluxes in distributed soil erosion models?"', Anonymous Referee #1, 26 Oct 2020
- AC1: 'Answer to referee #1', Cédric Legoût, 02 Dec 2020
-
EC1: 'short comment on Uber et al', Greg Hancock, 30 Nov 2020
- AC2: 'Answer to editor', Cédric Legoût, 16 Dec 2020
-
SC1: 'The way forward by combined hydrology-sediment modelling', Peter Molnar, 05 Dec 2020
- AC3: 'Reply on SC1', Cédric Legoût, 11 Jan 2021
Peer-review completion
AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
AR by Cédric Legoût on behalf of the Authors (11 Jan 2021)
Author's response
Manuscript
ED: Publish as is (13 Jan 2021) by Greg Hancock
ED: Publish as is (15 Jan 2021) by Tom Coulthard (Editor)
AR by Cédric Legoût on behalf of the Authors (20 Jan 2021)