Articles | Volume 9, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-9-379-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.Controls on the hydraulic geometry of alluvial channels: bank stability to gravitational failure, the critical-flow hypothesis, and conservation of mass and energy
Download
- Final revised paper (published on 26 Apr 2021)
- Supplement to the final revised paper
- Preprint (discussion started on 22 Jun 2020)
- Supplement to the preprint
Interactive discussion
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
- Printer-friendly version
- Supplement
- RC1: 'Review of Pelletier Controls on the hydraulic geometry of alluvial channels: bank stability to gravitational failure, the critical-flow hypothesis, and conservation of mass and energy', Gordon Grant, 22 Jul 2020
- RC2: 'Review of: "Controls on the hydraulic geometry of alluvial channels: bank stability to gravitational failure, the critical-flow hypothesis, and conservation of mass and energy" by Jon D. Pelletier', Roberto Fernandez, 16 Aug 2020
- RC3: 'Review of "Controls on the hydraulic geometry of alluvial channels: bank stability to gravitational failure, the critical-flow hypothesis, and conservation of mass and engery" by Pelletier', Christopher Hackney, 24 Aug 2020
- AC1: 'Responses to Reviewer Comments', Jon Pelletier , 28 Oct 2020
Peer-review completion
AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
AR by Jon Pelletier on behalf of the Authors (11 Dec 2020)
Author's response
Manuscript
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (21 Jan 2021) by Rebecca Hodge
RR by Roberto Fernández (he/él) (30 Jan 2021)
RR by Gordon Grant (03 Feb 2021)
ED: Publish subject to technical corrections (23 Feb 2021) by Rebecca Hodge
ED: Publish subject to technical corrections (24 Feb 2021) by Tom Coulthard (Editor)
AR by Jon Pelletier on behalf of the Authors (02 Mar 2021)
Author's response
Manuscript