Thank you for responding to the review comments and suggestions with this comprehensive revision of the paper. I believe it has improved the relevance and impact of this study. In particular, your expansion of presenting results also for k=10 and the additional insights this generates are very useful. I notice, however, that the conclusion has not been edited/revised from the previous version and that the abstract too only contains a few minor text edits. Given that the revised version now presents additional findings and discussion I believe it would be worth your while to edit the abstract and conclusion perhaps a bit more so that they also refer to these new additional findings; otherwise these additional insights may not get picked up by readers as much as you'd like. I am happy to proceed with publication of the current revision if you want, but I herewith want to give you the opportunity to edit the abstract and conclusion if you so wish.

I concur with the Associate Editor's suggestions that you make further revisions to the abstract and conclusions to reflect the hard work that you have put into revising the paper in response to the reviewers' comments.