Articles | Volume 14, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-14-653-2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-14-653-2026
ESurf Letters
 | Highlight paper
 | 
26 Aug 2026
ESurf Letters | Highlight paper |  | 26 Aug 2026

From regular to random: a unifying framework for step-pool spacing

Christian M. Erikson and Jens M. Turowski

Data sets

Compilation of Step-Pool Stream Sequence Spacing Erikson, Christian; Turowski, Jens; Curran, Joanna; Wohl, Ellen; Badoux, Alexandre https://doi.org/10.5880/GFZ.AVXH.2026.002

Model code and software

Code for Step-Pool Reference Lines C. Erikson https://github.com/cmerikson/StepPool_ReferenceLines

Download
Editorial statement
Mountain streams comprise between 60 and 80% of total global river length. A primary trait of these streams are step-pool sequences. Whether the spacing of these features are regularly or randomly spaced is matter of debate. Erikson and Turowski resolve longstanding tension between the two competing models. Using data on natural, experimental, and numerically simulated step-pool sequences, they demonstrate that step-pool spacing rarely matches either assumption, but rather exists within a continuum. The findings of Erikson and Turowski challenge existing step-pool formation models, emphasize that efforts to replicate or install step-pools are fundamentally misguided when assuming regularity or randomness, and offer a potential alternative.
Short summary
The expected spacing of step-pool sequences has long been mired in debate, hampering stream restoration efforts. We define a continuum to evaluate the degree of regularity and randomness across step-pools from field observations, flume experiments, and numerical simulations and show that the full range is occupied without one formation mechanism dominating. Bounds related to channel hydraulics provide a way to track dynamic step spacing without assuming a mechanism.
Share