Articles | Volume 14, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-14-653-2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-14-653-2026
ESurf Letters
 | Highlight paper
 | 
26 Aug 2026
ESurf Letters | Highlight paper |  | 26 Aug 2026

From regular to random: a unifying framework for step-pool spacing

Christian M. Erikson and Jens M. Turowski

Related authors

Thaw slump erosion accelerates fluvial sediment transport after a heatwave on the Taymyr Peninsula, Russia
Evan N. Dethier, Christian M. Erikson, and Carl E. Renshaw
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5691,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5691, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Badoux, A., Andres, N., and Turowski, J. M.: Damage costs due to bedload transport processes in Switzerland, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 279–294, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-14-279-2014, 2014. 
Benda, L., Hassan, M. A., Church, M., and May, C. L.: Geomorphology of Steepland Headwaters: The Transition from Hillslopes to Channels, JAWRA J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 41, 835–851, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2005.tb03773.x, 2005. 
Chartrand, S. M., Jellinek, M., Whiting, P. J., and Stamm, J.: Geometric scaling of step-pools in mountain streams: Observations and implications, Geomorphology, 129, 141–151, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2011.01.020, 2011. 
Chin, A.: Step pools in stream channels, Prog. Phys. Geogr., 13, 391–407, https://doi.org/10.1177/030913338901300304, 1989. 
Chin, A.: On the origin of step-pool sequences in mountain streams, Geophys. Res. Lett., 26, 231–234, https://doi.org/10.1029/1998GL900270, 1999a. 
Download
Editorial statement
Mountain streams comprise between 60 and 80% of total global river length. A primary trait of these streams are step-pool sequences. Whether the spacing of these features are regularly or randomly spaced is matter of debate. Erikson and Turowski resolve longstanding tension between the two competing models. Using data on natural, experimental, and numerically simulated step-pool sequences, they demonstrate that step-pool spacing rarely matches either assumption, but rather exists within a continuum. The findings of Erikson and Turowski challenge existing step-pool formation models, emphasize that efforts to replicate or install step-pools are fundamentally misguided when assuming regularity or randomness, and offer a potential alternative.
Short summary
The expected spacing of step-pool sequences has long been mired in debate, hampering stream restoration efforts. We define a continuum to evaluate the degree of regularity and randomness across step-pools from field observations, flume experiments, and numerical simulations and show that the full range is occupied without one formation mechanism dominating. Bounds related to channel hydraulics provide a way to track dynamic step spacing without assuming a mechanism.
Share