Dear authors, after the second round of reviews, one reviewer highlights that there are still some major and minor comments from the previous stage that have yet to be fully addressed.

We invite you to resubmit your manuscript after addressing all reviewer #2's comments. Please, pay attention to the comments also regarding minor typos and errors.

When resubmitting your manuscript, please carefully consider all issues mentioned in the reviewers' comments, and provide suitable rebuttals for any comments not addressed.
I hope that you find these comments useful and I will anticipate receiving your revision in due course.

the authors carefully addressed all the raised comments and provided a thorough review of the manuscript. I have one minor suggestion, maybe I missed it, but it would be useful to clarify in the caption the meaning of the dashed line in fig 2, and add the legend for the square symbol in Fig. 2a

Dear Thomas and colleagues,

Thank you for working with Gulia Sofia and her referees, and for making a special effort to responding to some of the very detailed comments. I am happy to follow Giulia's advice and accept the manuscript for publication. Please will you attend to her one minor comment about the caption of Fig.2?

Your manuscript will now be prepared for print by the publishers of Copernicus. Your prompt replies to their queries and instructions will help a speedy publication.

Thank you for submitting your work to ESurf. The step from 2D to 3D landslide inventories is an important one, with some major implications for our understanding of erosion. I trust that your paper will draw good attention.

Niels Hovius