Articles | Volume 10, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-10-247-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-10-247-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Morphodynamic styles: characterising the behaviour of gravel-bed rivers using a novel, quantitative index
William H. Booker
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Department of Geography, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
Brett C. Eaton
Department of Geography, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
Related authors
No articles found.
Nastaran Nematollahi, Brett Eaton, and Sarah Davidson
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5934, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5934, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Earth Surface Dynamics (ESurf).
Short summary
Short summary
We studied how river channels on an alluvial fan shift and reorganize over time. Using a physical experiment and high-resolution images, we tracked how the main channel moved and when it suddenly jumped to new paths. We found that small changes in how sediment moves across the fan can delay or prevent major shifts, showing that fans often regulate themselves in ways that help explain their unpredictable behavior.
Anya S. Leenman and Brett C. Eaton
Earth Surf. Dynam., 10, 1097–1114, https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-10-1097-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-10-1097-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The supply of sediment (sand and gravel) carried by a stream out of a steep mountain valley is widely thought to control the gradient of the fan-shaped landforms that streams often build where they leave their valley. We tested this idea in a set of
sandboxexperiments with oscillating high and low sediment supply. Even though the average sediment supply never changed, longer oscillations built flatter fans, indicating how wetter climates might affect these mountain landforms.
David L. Adams and Brett C. Eaton
Earth Surf. Dynam., 10, 895–907, https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-10-895-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-10-895-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Channel processes under flood conditions are important for river science and management as they involve high volumes of sediment transport and erosion. However, these processes remain poorly understood as the data are difficult to collect. Using a physical model of a river, we found that simple equations based on the mean shear stress and median grain size predicted sediment transport as accurately as ones that accounted for the full range of shear stresses.
Cited articles
Abrahams, A. D., Li, G., and Atkinson, J. F.: Step-Pool Streams: Adjustment to Maximum Flow Resistance, Water Resour. Res., 31, 2593–2602, https://doi.org/10.1029/95WR01957, 1995. a
Adams, D. L. and Zampiron, A.: Short Communication: Multiscalar Roughness Length Decomposition in Fluvial Systems Using a Transform-Roughness
Correlation (TRC) Approach, Earth Surf. Dynam., 8, 1039–1051,
https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-8-1039-2020, 2020. a, b
Ancey, C.: Bedload Transport: A Walk between Randomness and Determinism.
Part 1. The State of the Art, J. Hydraul. Res., 58, 1–17, https://doi.org/10.1080/00221686.2019.1702594, 2020. a
Ancey, C., Böhm, T., Jodeau, M., and Frey, P.: Statistical Description of
Sediment Transport Experiments, Phys. Rev. E, 74, 011302, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.74.011302, 2006. a, b
Ashmore, P. E.: How Do Gravel-Bed Rivers Braid?, Can. J. Earth Sci., 28, 326–341, https://doi.org/10.1139/e91-030, 1991. a
Booker, W. H.: WillBooker/WB_BC_ESurf_2021: Updated for Publication (Version V1.1), Zenodo [data set, code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6237686, 2022. a
Booker, W. H. and Eaton, B. C.: Stabilising Large Grains in Self-Forming Steep Channels, Earth Surf. Dynam., 8, 51–67, https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-8-51-2020,
2020. a, b
Buffington, J. M. and Montgomery, D. R.: 9.36 Geomorphic Classification of
Rivers, in: Treatise on Geomorphology, edited by: Shroder, J. F., Academic Press, San Diego, 730–767, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-374739-6.00263-3, 2013. a
Church, M.: Geomorphic Thresholds in Riverine Landscapes, Freshwater Biol., 47, 541–557, https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2427.2002.00919.x, 2002. a
Church, M.: Bed Material Transport and the Morphology of Alluvial River Channels, Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci., 34, 325–354, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.earth.33.092203.122721, 2006. a
Church, M. and Ferguson, R. I.: Morphodynamics: Rivers beyond Steady State,
Water Resour. Res., 51, 1883–1897, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR016862, 2015. a
Davies, T. R. H. and Sutherland, A. J.: Extremal Hypotheses for River Behavior, Water Resour. Res., 19, 141–148, https://doi.org/10.1029/WR019i001p00141, 1983. a
Desloges, J. R. and Church, M. A.: Wandering Gravel-Bed Rivers, The Canadian Geographer/Le Géographe canadien, 33, 360–364,
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0064.1989.tb00922.x, 1989. a, b, c
Dhont, B. and Ancey, C.: Are Bedload Transport Pulses in Gravel Bed Rivers Created by Bar Migration or Sediment Waves?, Geophys. Res. Lett., 45, 5501–5508, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL077792, 2018. a, b
Eaton, B. C. and Lapointe, M. F.: Effects of Large Floods on Sediment Transport and Reach Morphology in the Cobble-Bed Sainte Marguerite River,
Geomorphology, 40, 291–309, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-555X(01)00056-3, 2001. a
Fenton, J. D. and Abbott, J. E.: Initial Movement of Grains on a Stream Bed: The Effect of Relative Protrusion, P. Roy. Soc. Lond. A, 352, 523–537, https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1977.0014, 1977. a
Friedkin, J. F.: Laboratory Study of the Meandering of Alluvial Rivers,
US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi, https://hdl.handle.net/11681/2955 (last access: 17 March 2022), 1945. a
Ganti, V., Meerschaert, M. M., Foufoula-Georgiou, E., Viparelli, E., and
Parker, G.: Normal and Anomalous Diffusion of Gravel Tracer Particles in Rivers, J. Geophys. Res.-Earth, 115, F00A12, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JF001222, 2010. a
Hardy, R. J., Best, J. L., Parsons, D. R., and Marjoribanks, T. I.: On the
Evolution and Form of Coherent Flow Structures over a Gravel Bed: Insights from Whole Flow Field Visualization and Measurement, J. Geophys. Res.-Earth, 121, 1472–1493, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JF003753, 2016. a
Hassan, M. A., Church, M., and Ashworth, P. J.: Virtual Rate and Mean Distance of Travel of Individual Clasts in Gravel-Bed Channels, Earth Surf. Proc. Land., 17, 617–627, https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3290170607, 1992. a
Hassan, M. A., Saletti, M., Johnson, J. P. L., Ferrer-Boix, C., Venditti, J. G., and Church, M.: Experimental Insights Into the Threshold of Motion in Alluvial Channels: Sediment Supply and Streambed State, J. Geophys. Res.-Earth, 125, e2020JF005736, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JF005736, 2020. a
Kasprak, A., Wheaton, J. M., Ashmore, P. E., Hensleigh, J. W., and Peirce, S.: The Relationship between Particle Travel Distance and Channel Morphology:
Results from Physical Models of Braided Rivers, J. Geophys. Res.-Earth, 120, 55–74, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JF003310, 2015. a
Kellner, J. R., Armston, J., Birrer, M., Cushman, K. C., Duncanson, L., Eck,
C., Falleger, C., Imbach, B., Král, K., Krůček, M., Trochta, J., Vrška, T., and Zgraggen, C.: New Opportunities for Forest Remote Sensing Through Ultra-High-Density Drone Lidar, Surv. Geophys., 40, 959–977, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-019-09529-9, 2019. a
Lane, E. W.: A Study of the Shape of Channels Formed by Natural Streams Flowing in Erodible Material, Missouri River Division Sediment Series No. 9,
US Army Corps of Engineers Missouri River Division, Omaha, Nebraska, https://hdl.handle.net/11681/8944 (last access: 17 March 2022), 1957. a
Leduc, P., Peirce, S., and Ashmore, P.: Short Communication: Challenges and
Applications of Structure-from-Motion Photogrammetry in a Physical Model of a
Braided River, Earth Surf. Dynam., 7, 97–106, https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-7-97-2019, 2019. a
Leopold, L. B. and Maddock, T.: The Hydraulic Geometry of Stream Channels and
Some Physiographic Implications, USGS Numbered Series 252, US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, https://doi.org/10.3133/pp252, 1953. a
Lisle, T. E., Ikeda, H., and Iseya, F.: Formation of Stationary Alternate Bars in a Steep Channel with Mixed-Size Sediment: A Flume Experiment, Earth
Surf. Proc. Land., 16, 463–469, https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3290160507, 1991. a
MacKenzie, L.: Channel Stability in Alluvial Gravel-Bed Streams, PhD thesis,
University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada, 171 pp.,
https://doi.org/10.14288/1.0379863, 2019. a, b
MacKenzie, L. G. and Eaton, B. C.: Large Grains Matter: Contrasting Bed
Stability and Morphodynamics during Two Nearly Identical Experiments, Earth
Surf. Proc. Land., 42, 1287–1295, https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.4122, 2017. a
Montgomery, D. R. and Buffington, J. M.: Channel Classification, Prediction of Channel Response, and Assessment of Channel Condition, Tech. Rep. TFW-SH10-93-002, Washington State Department of Natural Resources,
Olympia, Washington, 1993. a
Montgomery, D. R. and Buffington, J. M.: Channel-Reach Morphology in Mountain
Drainage Basins, Geol. Soc. Am. Bull., 109, 596–611,
https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1997)109<0596:CRMIMD>2.3.CO;2, 1997. a, b
Montgomery, D. R., Abbe, T. B., Buffington, J. M., Peterson, N. P., Schmidt, K. M., and Stock, J. D.: Distribution of Bedrock and Alluvial Channels in
Forested Mountain Drainage Basins, Nature, 381, 587–589, https://doi.org/10.1038/381587a0, 1996. a
Morgan, J. A., Brogan, D. J., and Nelson, P. A.: Application of Structure-from-Motion Photogrammetry in Laboratory Flumes, Geomorphology, 276, 125–143, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2016.10.021, 2017. a
Phillips, J.: Nonlinear Dynamical Systems in Geomorphology: Revolution or
Evolution?, Geomorphology, 5, 219–229, https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-555X(92)90005-9,
1992. a
Phillips, J. D.: Sources of Nonlinearity and Complexity in Geomorphic Systems, Prog. Phys. Geogr., 27, 1–23, https://doi.org/10.1191/0309133303pp340ra, 2003. a
Popov, I. V.: Application of Morphological Analysis to the Evaluation of the
General Channel Deformations of the River Ob, Soviet Hydrol., 3, 267–324, 1962. a
Pyrce, R. S. and Ashmore, P. E.: Bedload Path Length and Point Bar Development in Gravel-Bed River Models, Sedimentology, 52, 839–857,
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3091.2005.00714.x, 2005. a
Redolfi, M., Welber, M., Carlin, M., Tubino, M., and Bertoldi, W.: Morphometric Properties of Alternate Bars and Water Discharge: A Laboratory Investigation, Earth Surface Dynamics, 8, 789–808, https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-8-789-2020, 2020. a
Reitz, M. D. and Jerolmack, D. J.: Experimental Alluvial Fan Evolution: Channel Dynamics, Slope Controls, and Shoreline Growth, J. Geophys. Res.-Earth, 117, F02021, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JF002261, 2012. a
Resop, J. P., Lehmann, L., and Hession, W. C.: Drone Laser Scanning for
Modeling Riverscape Topography and Vegetation: Comparison with Traditional Aerial Lidar, Drones, 3, 35, https://doi.org/10.3390/drones3020035, 2019. a
Rhoads, B. L.: The Dynamic Basis of Geomorphology Reenvisioned, Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr., 96, 14–30, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.2006.00496.x, 2006. a, b
Rosgen, D. L.: A Classification of Natural Rivers, Catena, 22, 169–199, 1994. a
Rust, B. R.: Structure and Process in a Braided River, Sedimentology, 18, 221–245, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3091.1972.tb00013.x, 1972. a
Schumm, S. A.: Geomorphic Thresholds: The Concept and Its Applications, T. Inst. Brit. Geogr., 4, 485–515, 1979. a
Simon, A. and Thorne, C. R.: Channel Adjustment of an Unstable Coarse-Grained Stream: Opposing Trends of Boundary and Critical Shear Stress, and the Applicability of Extremal Hypotheses, Earth Surf. Proc. Land., 21, 155–180,
https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9837(199602)21:2<155::AID-ESP610>3.0.CO;2-5, 1996. a
Strahler, A. N.: Dynamic Basis of Geomorphology, Geol. Soc. Am. Bull., 63, 923–938, https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1952)63[923:DBOG]2.0.CO;2, 1952. a, b
Vargas-Luna, A., Crosato, A., and Uijttewaal, W. S. J.: Effects of Vegetation
on Flow and Sediment Transport: Comparative Analyses and Validation of Predicting Models, Earth Surf. Proc. Land., 40, 157–176, https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3633, 2015. a
Wheaton, J. M., Brasington, J., Darby, S. E., Kasprak, A., Sear, D., and
Vericat, D.: Morphodynamic Signatures of Braiding Mechanisms as Expressed
through Change in Sediment Storage in a Gravel-Bed River, J. Geophys. Res.-Earth, 118, 759–779, https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrf.20060, 2013. a, b
Whitehead, A. N.: Process and Reality: An Essay in Cosmology, Macmillan, New York, ISBN 0029345804, 1929. a
Wilcock, P. R.: Critical Shear Stress of Natural Sediments, J. Hydraul. Eng., 119, 491–505, 1993. a
Williams, R. D., Rennie, C. D., Brasington, J., Hicks, D. M., and Vericat, D.: Linking the Spatial Distribution of Bed Load Transport to Morphological
Change during High-Flow Events in a Shallow Braided River: Spatially Distributed Bedload Transport, J. Geophys. Res.-Earth, 120, 604–622, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JF003346, 2015. a, b
Zimmermann, A., Church, M., and Hassan, M. A.: Step-Pool Stability: Testing
the Jammed State Hypothesis, J. Geophys. Res.-Earth, 115, F02008, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JF001365, 2010. a
Short summary
Channel behaviour is a qualitative aspect of river research that needs development to produce a framework of analysis between and within types of channels. We seek to produce a quantitative metric that can capture how a channel changes using a pair of experiments and collecting easy to obtain data. We demonstrate that this new technique is capable of discerning between river types and may provide a new tool with which we may describe channel behaviour.
Channel behaviour is a qualitative aspect of river research that needs development to produce a...